MACHINE ASR ACCESSIBILITY AID
SADEHA 03.m4a
Timestamped machine output
- 0:00–0:30यह आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आ� आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आ� आ
- 0:30–0:34And suddenly, that glass case is just completely shattered.
- 0:34–0:36We're looking at a preservation landscape today
- 0:36–0:39that is incredibly messy, chaotic, and loud.
- 0:39–0:43It really is the absolute definition of a cultural battleground.
- 0:43–0:44It is.
- 0:44–0:47So today, we have a stack of sources that is quite frankly mind-blowing.
- 0:47–0:51We're going to be looking at excerpts from the 2009 to 2010
- 0:51–0:53print anthology of Videa.
- 0:53–0:55Right, which was a massive undertaking.
- 0:55–0:57Right. For context for you listening,
- 0:57–1:01Videha is the first ever Mathili Fortnightly e-journal.
- 1:01–1:06And our mission for this deep dive is to explore how a grassroots digital literature movement
- 1:06–1:11acts as both a time capsule preserving an ancient culture and at the exact same time
- 1:11–1:16a megaphone for raw unfiltered socio-political critique.
- 1:16–1:21And to really set the scene for you we have to understand the staggering scale of the Videha project.
- 1:21–1:23Yeah let's get into those numbers.
- 1:23–1:26Looking at the editor's note, this is by Gajendra Thakur.
- 1:26–1:30In the 2009 to 2010 volume, you realize
- 1:30–1:32this isn't a simple newsletter put together
- 1:32–1:33by a few hobbyists.
- 1:33–1:34No, not at all.
- 1:34–1:36It's a monumental linguistic resurrection.
- 1:36–1:38I mean, at the time of this publication,
- 1:38–1:39they had already released 50 issues.
- 1:39–1:4050 issues.
- 1:40–1:42Okay, let's unpack this setup.
- 1:42–1:44We're looking at a digital archive
- 1:44–1:46that bridges ancient palm leaf manuscripts
- 1:46–1:49and 21st century internet culture.
- 1:49–1:50And why does this matter to you?
- 1:50–1:56because it's a masterclass in how a community fights to keep its soul alive in a rapidly changing world.
- 1:56–2:01It's about what happens when an ancient language crashes headfirst into the Unicode era.
- 2:01–2:07And to understand the magnitude of that crash, we really need to look at the numbers PACCOR provides.
- 2:07–2:11They built a 5 million word Mothelli Internet corpus.
- 2:11–2:145 million words? That's just wild!
- 2:14–2:19It's huge! They published 6,000 pages of new literature.
- 2:19–2:206,000.
- 2:20–2:27And perhaps most astonishingly, they digitized 1,100 pages of ancient palm leaf and other manuscripts.
- 2:27–2:27Wow.
- 2:27–2:33Yeah, translating them from the ancient mytholoxure script into the modern Devanagari script.
- 2:33–2:38I want to link around that physical labor for a moment because, I mean, imagine 1,100 pages of palm leaves.
- 2:38–2:39Palm leaves are organic matter.
- 2:39–2:40They rot.
- 2:40–2:42Exactly, they degrade.
- 2:42–2:47They are susceptible to the intense humidity of South Asia to insects, to simple friction.
- 2:47–2:49Just touching them can damage them.
- 2:49–2:52Right, so you are taking something physically decaying,
- 2:52–2:53written in a script in methyloxchar
- 2:53–2:56that fewer and fewer people can even decipher today,
- 2:56–2:57and you are hard-coding it
- 2:57–2:59into the digital DNA of the internet.
- 2:59–3:01It's a massive rescue operation.
- 3:01–3:05It reminds me of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, you know,
- 3:05–3:08where scientists lock away seeds in the arctic ice
- 3:08–3:11to protect global agriculture from a doomsday scenario.
- 3:11–3:13But here, they are doing it
- 3:13–3:16for an entire culture's literary heritage.
- 3:16–3:18That's a great comparison.
- 3:18–3:23And the technological context of 2009 is critical to appreciate what they actually accomplished here.
- 3:23–3:26Yeah, tell me about that because the internet was very different back then.
- 3:26–3:31It was. The editor mentions that their work on the Videa archive actually formed the basis for
- 3:31–3:35publishing the very first Unicode print book in Mayfili.
- 3:35–3:36Oh well.
- 3:36–3:41Yeah, just a year prior in 2008, and bringing a regional language into the Unicode standard
- 3:41–3:43that is a profound technological leap.
- 3:43–3:45Because before Unico, you couldn't just type it, right?
- 3:45–3:52Exactly. Before Unicode standardization, if you wanted to put a regional language on the internet, you often had to create a custom font.
- 3:52–3:57The text wasn't encoded as distinct letters in the computer's underlying architecture.
- 3:57–3:58So it was just a picture.
- 3:58–4:03Basically, yeah, it was a rendering trick. This meant search engines like Google couldn't read it at all.
- 4:03–4:05You couldn't copy, paste, or search the text.
- 4:05–4:12The text was essentially a ghost in the machine. Like a picture of a word rather than the data of the word itself.
- 4:12–4:17Precisely. Entering the Unicode standard is digital legitimization.
- 4:17–4:18That makes total sense.
- 4:18–4:24It means your language has a permanent, mathematically recognized address on the internet. It transforms
- 4:24–4:30a language from an unsearchable image file into data that algorithms can parse, index,
- 4:30–4:32and archive indefinitely.
- 4:32–4:37So they were dragging this ancient language into the 21st century so it could actually
- 4:37–4:39participate in the global digital infrastructure.
- 4:39–4:41Right. And they didn't stop at the internet either.
- 4:41–4:42No, they didn't.
- 4:42–4:46The source highlights that they created the first Mathili Braille book.
- 4:46–4:48Yeah, a novel by Sahasbathin.
- 4:48–4:53Right, released in 2009 and sent to a blind school in Darbanga.
- 4:53–4:58This tells me their definition of preservation wasn't just about saving old texts for academics.
- 4:58–4:59No, it was much broader.
- 4:59–5:01It was about radical accessibility.
- 5:01–5:02Absolutely.
- 5:02–5:06They were operating across digital text, audio, and video.
- 5:06–5:11The archive mentions over 100 hours of video including full plays, children's cartoons,
- 5:11–5:13and traditional Mathila paintings.
- 5:13–5:15That's a whole multimedia ecosystem.
- 5:15–5:19It is, and integrating Braille into this ecosystem proves that for the people behind
- 5:19–5:23Vidaea, accessibility was a core philosophy.
- 5:23–5:29They recognize that a language only survives if every single member of the community, regardless
- 5:29–5:33of physical ability or technological access, can participate in it.
- 5:33–5:36That level of inclusion is inspiring.
- 5:36–5:39I have to ask the difficult question here.
- 5:39–5:40Sure, go ahead.
- 5:40–5:46We see this massive digitization effort happening in 2009, but isn't there a severe risk involved?
- 5:46–5:48What kind of risk?
- 5:48–5:52When you take localized oral traditions, when you take a sacred text written on a palm
- 5:52–5:57leaf by a scholar centuries ago, and you upload it to a global server farm, do you
- 5:57–5:58sanitize it?
- 5:58–5:59Oh, I see what you mean.
- 5:59–6:04Yeah, taking an artifact out of its geographical and ritualistic context and flattening it
- 6:04–6:09onto a glowing screen. Doesn't that fundamentally change the nature of the culture itself? There's
- 6:09–6:14a genuine anxiety that in saving the data, you lose the soul.
- 6:14–6:18That anxiety plagues literally every digital preservation project. How do you keep the
- 6:18–6:22authenticity intact when the medium is so drastically altered?
- 6:22–6:28Gajendra Thakura actually addresses this, but not through some lofty philosophical
- 6:28–6:29essay.
- 6:29–6:30No, he goes hard.
- 6:30–6:35addresses it through rigid, almost aggressive enforcement of authenticity boundaries.
- 6:35–6:36The ban list.
- 6:36–6:38Yes, the ban list.
- 6:38–6:43The editor explicitly includes a notice about a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism in his
- 6:43–6:44introductory note.
- 6:44–6:46And he doesn't just issue a vague warning.
- 6:46–6:53No, he names specific individuals, he lists their various aliases and incredibly publishes
- 6:53–6:55their actual IP addresses.
- 6:55–6:57Publishing IP addresses in 2009.
- 6:57–6:59I mean, that is aggressive digital policing.
- 6:59–7:04He is literally acting as the bouncer at the door of this newly built digital museum.
- 7:04–7:05He had to.
- 7:05–7:10He caught people stealing the work of prominent authors, people like Douglas Kellner from UCLA
- 7:10–7:12and the Hindi poet Arun Kamal.
- 7:12–7:16He even publishes a direct email from Douglas Kellner in the text thanking him for the
- 7:16–7:17detective work.
- 7:17–7:18I loved reading that email in the text.
- 7:18–7:21It's just like, dear Gachendra, thanks for the detective work.
- 7:21–7:22Was there a response?
- 7:22–7:23Best regards, Douglas Kellner.
- 7:23–7:25Yeah, very casual.
- 7:25–7:30It is so matter of fact, but it reveals a fierce protection of intellectual property.
- 7:30–7:36Because often regional languages and grassroots digital platforms are viewed by bad actors as
- 7:36–7:37a wild west.
- 7:37–7:38Oh, absolutely.
- 7:38–7:40A place to scrape content.
- 7:40–7:41Right.
- 7:41–7:44A place where content can be scraped, translated, and stolen without consequence because they
- 7:44–7:46think no one is watching.
- 7:46–7:48But Taqour was watching.
- 7:48–7:54By policing plagiarism so strictly, the Vedea editorial board was sending a clear message.
- 7:54–7:58Mathili literature on the internet has intrinsic value.
- 7:58–7:58Yes.
- 7:58–8:01It commands respect and it has ownership.
- 8:01–8:04They were setting the terms of their digital existence,
- 8:04–8:05ensuring that moving into the Unicode era
- 8:05–8:08didn't mean diluting their cultural output.
- 8:08–8:09And because this digital archive locked
- 8:09–8:11in their cultural identity and fiercely protected
- 8:11–8:14its borders, it naturally became a safe haven.
- 8:14–8:17A place for writers to express the kind of raw, unfiltered
- 8:17–8:20sentiment that mainstream state-run media often
- 8:20–8:21ignores or sanitizes.
- 8:21–8:22Definitely.
- 8:22–8:23Which leads us to look at what
- 8:23–8:27of 2009 and 2010 were actually saying once they had this platform.
- 8:27–8:29And the answer is they were incredibly angry.
- 8:29–8:32The political poetry in this archive is blistering.
- 8:32–8:39Now before we analyze these specific poems, we really need to frame how we are approaching
- 8:39–8:40this.
- 8:40–8:41That's important, yes.
- 8:41–8:43When we look at these highly charged political texts regarding the Matesha movement in the
- 8:43–8:49Paul and regional politics, we have to read them as historians reading a thermometer.
- 8:49–8:52We aren't here to validate the politics of the movement.
- 8:52–8:53Right.
- 8:53–8:55the severe critiques of the leaders mentioned,
- 8:55–8:59our job is simply to impartially observe
- 8:59–9:02the raw political temperature of the Mathili writers
- 9:02–9:04at that exact moment in time,
- 9:04–9:07and to convey the ideas from the source material
- 9:07–9:08to you listening.
- 9:08–9:10Exactly, and that thermometer was practically
- 9:10–9:11shattering from the heat.
- 9:11–9:12Yeah, it really was.
- 9:12–9:14To understand the context, the Terai region,
- 9:14–9:18also known as Madhash, is the southern plains of Nepal.
- 9:18–9:20Historically, the people there felt
- 9:20–9:21deeply disenfranchised.
- 9:21–9:23Underrepresented in the state apparatus.
- 9:23–9:28Right, and economically marginalized compared to the Hill-Centric political elite in Kathmandu.
- 9:28–9:33So in the late 2000s, following the end of the Nepalese Civil War and the Hanarchy, the
- 9:33–9:35Madhash movement just erupted.
- 9:35–9:37It was a massive demand for change.
- 9:37–9:42It was a demand for federalism, proportional representation, and basic human dignity.
- 9:42–9:46And that historical friction is captured perfectly by Mahendra Kumar Mishra.
- 9:46–9:49He was actually a former member of parliament in Nepal.
- 9:49–9:50He was, yeah.
- 9:50–9:54and he writes with absolute disgust toward the political elite.
- 9:54–9:56He calls out leaders by name
- 9:56–9:58Girija Prasad Kaurala,
- 9:58–9:59Madhav Kamar Nepal,
- 9:59–10:01Pushpaka Maldahal,
- 10:01–10:02who is known as Prachanda.
- 10:02–10:07Mishra's poem is just a searing indictment of a compromise revolution.
- 10:07–10:09He asks this devastating rhetorical question.
- 10:09–10:10He says,
- 10:10–10:12Why do you need democracy?
- 10:12–10:14Since democracy has now vanished,
- 10:14–10:15enjoy your loot.
- 10:15–10:16Enjoy your loot.
- 10:16–10:17Wow.
- 10:17–10:20He accuses the politicians of ignoring the rights of the people
- 10:20–10:22and just filling their bags.
- 10:22–10:23The imagery is so vivid.
- 10:23–10:24It really is.
- 10:24–10:27He says, Miesola is crying in shame looking at their deeds.
- 10:27–10:31It's the pain of someone who believed in a political transformation, only to feel that
- 10:31–10:35the new leaders are simply a different set of rulers, extracting wealth from the same
- 10:35–10:36vulnerable population.
- 10:36–10:41And then Amkumar Jha takes that sentiment and pushes it into the realm of direct threat
- 10:41–10:42against the establishment.
- 10:42–10:44Yeah, his poem is intense.
- 10:44–10:47The title of his poem translates to an urgent call to action.
- 10:47–10:50He writes, the blood of the 25 martyrs is saying,
- 10:50–10:52wake up, Madheshi, wake up.
- 10:52–10:55Referring to the casualties during the intense protests.
- 10:55–10:59Right, and Jaa accuses the leaders of severe deceit.
- 10:59–11:01He compares them to Hiranyakashipu.
- 11:01–11:04A demon king in Hindu mythology, right?
- 11:04–11:07Exactly, known for his sheer arrogance and cruelty.
- 11:07–11:10The mythological parallel is powerful.
- 11:10–11:13He is saying the state is operating with demonic cruelty,
- 11:13–11:15holding a gun to kill the Madheshis.
- 11:15–11:17but Shaw's core message is that the movement
- 11:17–11:19is an unstoppable awakening.
- 11:19–11:20Yes, an awakened.
- 11:20–11:23He writes, by taking the votes of the Tyrian Medeshes,
- 11:23–11:27the rulers moved ahead, leaving the Medeshes to fight.
- 11:27–11:29He is articulating the deep frustration
- 11:29–11:32of being used as a convenient voting block to gain power,
- 11:32–11:34and then being immediately discarded
- 11:34–11:36once the elections are over.
- 11:36–11:39This theme of a mass, unstoppable awakening
- 11:39–11:42echoes really loudly in Dr. Surrenderlav's poem,
- 11:42–11:44Inquilab, which translates to revolution.
- 11:44–11:45Hove, alwa.
- 11:45–11:47Love's imagery is practically apocalyptic.
- 11:47–11:51He writes, the storm has risen, the fire has risen, every house is on fire.
- 11:51–11:54He talks about a total mobilization of society.
- 11:54–11:56The youth have risen, the women have risen.
- 11:56–11:58He even says the graveyard has risen.
- 11:58–11:59Yeah, that line gave me chills.
- 11:59–12:01The blood in the veins is boiling.
- 12:02–12:03The fist of revolution is raised.
- 12:04–12:07What strikes me about these poems is the sheer immediacy of them.
- 12:07–12:11State histories, written decades later, tend to smooth out the edges
- 12:11–12:12of political movement.
- 12:12–12:13They sanitize them.
- 12:13–12:14Exactly.
- 12:14–12:20They turn violent desperate struggles into neat chapters about constitutional transitions.
- 12:20–12:25But reading these poems in the Vidae archive, you aren't reading a sanitized summary.
- 12:25–12:30You are feeling the exact pulse of the people in the streets in 2009.
- 12:30–12:34It acts as a real-time ledger of public sentiment.
- 12:34–12:38But what makes this archive so comprehensive is that it doesn't just focus on the high-level
- 12:38–12:39political betrayal.
- 12:39–12:41No, it goes much deeper.
- 12:41–12:45The poets understand that this political anger isn't happening in a vacuum.
- 12:45–12:51The rage directed at politicians is fundamentally fueled by systemic, crushing economic realities.
- 12:51–12:54The failure of the state is felt most acutely in the stomach.
- 12:54–12:55Right.
- 12:55–13:00And the transition from the political poems to the poems exploring poverty is profound.
- 13:00–13:04The political pieces are loud, mobilizing, and public.
- 13:04–13:05Very public.
- 13:05–13:10But when the poets write about the class divide, the tone shifts to something quiet,
- 13:10–13:12and absolutely devastating.
- 13:12–13:14They break down the mechanics of poverty
- 13:14–13:16at the most granular level.
- 13:16–13:19Roshan Janakpuri's poem, Chapal and Sedak,
- 13:19–13:21which means slippers in the road
- 13:21–13:24is a brilliant exploration of class disparity
- 13:24–13:25through sensory details.
- 13:25–13:26Round of melting slippers.
- 13:26–13:28He paints a picture of worn out slippers
- 13:28–13:30melting on a scorching road,
- 13:30–13:31which represents the poor laborer.
- 13:31–13:34And he contrasts those decaying slippers
- 13:34–13:36with the polished shoes of the rich.
- 13:36–13:40Janakpuri notes a dangerous alchemy happening there.
- 13:40–13:43The blistering heat of the road beneath the slipper, combined with the heat of an empty
- 13:43–13:45stomach, creates a volcano.
- 13:45–13:46That's a great way to put it.
- 13:46–13:50He writes, the belly of my slipper wearing mother is still empty, the stove is still
- 13:50–13:53cold and her eyes are filled with outrage.
- 13:53–13:57The contrast between the cold stove and the hot anger perfectly encapsulates the
- 13:57–14:00daily tension of the impoverished.
- 14:00–14:05The physical environment is hostile and the domestic space offers absolutely no relief.
- 14:05–14:11But nothing in this entire archive arrested me, quite like Dr. Shanku Kumar Singh's lullaby.
- 14:11–14:12It's simply titled, Lori.
- 14:12–14:16Oh man, that one is a master class in dark irony.
- 14:16–14:17It really is.
- 14:17–14:21It's written from the perspective of a child speaking to their mother.
- 14:21–14:24The child says, you sing a lullaby and I will sleep.
- 14:24–14:28I am hungry, my body is shivering from the cold.
- 14:28–14:33The mother has no food, no blanket, only her voice to offer as a distraction.
- 14:33–14:37But then the child points at a scene occurring outside their immediate misery.
- 14:37–14:41The child says, look there in that car, a white dog is roaming, eating milk and rice.
- 14:41–14:46A human child is shivering and starving, acutely aware that a wealthy person's pet is
- 14:46–14:48being fed delicacies.
- 14:48–14:49Milk and rice.
- 14:49–14:50Right.
- 14:50–14:52Milk and refs his comfort food off in a luxury and severe poverty.
- 14:52–14:56The child is watching an animal receive the exact sustenance and warmth they are
- 14:56–14:57being denied.
- 14:57–14:59And then the child asks a haunting question.
- 14:59–15:01Is it a crime to be human?
- 15:01–15:03That line hits so hard.
- 15:03–15:07It is a searing indictment of a society's misplaced values.
- 15:07–15:12When animals belonging to the elite are treated with more dignity and care than the human children
- 15:12–15:17of the poor, the moral compass of that society hadn't just drifted.
- 15:17–15:19It has completely shattered.
- 15:19–15:20Absolutely shattered.
- 15:20–15:22And the mother is totally powerless.
- 15:22–15:25Her only response is the continued lullaby.
- 15:25–15:28You sing a lullaby, I will sleep, mother.
- 15:28–15:33We see the mechanics of this systemic cruelty laid bare in another piece too, Rupadiru's
- 15:33–15:36poem, Pizaf Pita, or labor pain.
- 15:36–15:41This poem explores the violent intersection of extreme poverty, gender, and the feudal
- 15:41–15:42landlord system.
- 15:42–15:47It describes a woman who goes into labor while actively working in the agricultural fields.
- 15:47–15:49She gives birth to a son right there in the dirt.
- 15:49–15:52And for a fleeting tragic moment, she experiences a sense of hope.
- 15:52–15:53She does.
- 15:53–15:57She thinks her son will grow up to share the crushing burden of physical labor.
- 15:57–16:01But his hands might eventually help them avoid taking on crippling debt just to survive
- 16:01–16:02another season.
- 16:02–16:06But the economic reality suffocates that hope instantly.
- 16:06–16:11Because she has just given birth, she requires basic sustenance to recover.
- 16:11–16:16So she goes to the landlord's house, asking for a small portion of rice and lentils.
- 16:16–16:21And the landlord's response is a display of absolute dehumanization.
- 16:21–16:24He doesn't merely refuse her the food, he verbally attacks her.
- 16:24–16:28He yells at her, essentially asking if she thinks she's a queen who deserves luxury.
- 16:28–16:29A queen.
- 16:29–16:30She just gave birth in the dirt.
- 16:30–16:31Right.
- 16:31–16:35He demands to know why she is resting instead of working on the very day she gave birth.
- 16:35–16:39The landlord strips her of her biological reality entirely.
- 16:39–16:44In his eyes, she's not a human mother who has just undergone a massive physical trauma.
- 16:44–16:45No.
- 16:45–16:48She's purely a unit of agricultural labor.
- 16:48–16:52By needing to rest, she is viewed as a machine that is momentarily malfunctioning
- 16:52–16:53and costing him productivity.
- 16:53–16:55It's horrific.
- 16:55–17:00These poems document a level of exploitation that official economic reports, the ones which
- 17:00–17:04just measure GDP and trade deficits, completely fail to capture.
- 17:04–17:07They measure the emotional and physical toll of the class divide.
- 17:07–17:08Exactly.
- 17:08–17:12And think about the narratives we are constantly fed about success today.
- 17:12–17:14We are sold the idea of the meritocracy.
- 17:14–17:17Oh sure, put your head down, work hard.
- 17:17–17:20Maintain your integrity and society will reward you.
- 17:20–17:25Upendravagat Nagvanshi dismantles that narrative completely in his poem, Boudwa, which focuses
- 17:25–17:28on an old man navigating this corrupt system.
- 17:28–17:34The old man wrestles with temptation, asking himself, should I steal, should I commit robbery,
- 17:34–17:35pickpocket?
- 17:35–17:37No, I will work honestly.
- 17:37–17:39He chooses the moral high ground.
- 17:39–17:42He works grueling hours to earn his honest wages.
- 17:42–17:46But the poem revealed the crushing mathematical reality of his honest.
- 17:46–17:47It doesn't add up.
- 17:47–17:53His meager wages simply cannot buy enough food to fill the stomachs of his five family members.
- 17:53–17:57His physical body is literally melting away from the relentless labor.
- 17:57–18:01His children look at him and ask what he has actually done for them, completely oblivious
- 18:01–18:03to his moral victory.
- 18:03–18:05Because a moral victory doesn't put food on the table.
- 18:05–18:06Right.
- 18:06–18:10The poem ends with the old man muttering to himself, starving.
- 18:10–18:14In a thoroughly corrupt system, honesty is not a virtue that leaves to reward.
- 18:14–18:16It is a rapid path to starvation.
- 18:16–18:21And when honesty and backbreaking labor in your native village only yield starvation and abuse
- 18:21–18:24from landlords, a demographic inevitability occurs.
- 18:24–18:25Migration.
- 18:25–18:26Exactly.
- 18:26–18:28When staying mean starving, you have to leave.
- 18:28–18:34The massive demographic shift from rural Mithila to urban centers across India and
- 18:34–18:38to the Gulf states is a defining feature of the region's modern history.
- 18:38–18:44The poets in the Vidae archive document this rural exodus not as an exciting pursuit
- 18:44–18:47of global opportunity, but as a profound tragedy.
- 18:47–18:48It's a loss.
- 18:48–18:51Amrindra Yadav writes a direct plea to the youth.
- 18:51–18:53He addresses them using common names,
- 18:53–18:55Dina Badri, Krishna Ram Sobaran,
- 18:55–18:58which serve as stand-dose for all the young men
- 18:58–19:00who have boarded trains for Punjab,
- 19:00–19:02or flights to the deserts of Saudi Arabia
- 19:02–19:04and the slums of Bombay.
- 19:04–19:06The imagery Yadav uses to describe
- 19:06–19:08the village left behind is haunting.
- 19:08–19:10He writes, here in your home,
- 19:10–19:12your five-monde hoe is crying in the corner.
- 19:12–19:14That's such a striking image.
- 19:14–19:15Just to clarify,
- 19:15–19:17Amand is a traditional unit of weight,
- 19:17–19:20making this a heavy, vital agricultural tool.
- 19:20–19:23And it is just rusting away,
- 19:23–19:25personified as weeping in the corner.
- 19:25–19:27He tells them, your fields are becoming barren,
- 19:27–19:29your cattle sheds are empty.
- 19:29–19:30He is begging them to return,
- 19:30–19:34promising that if they apply their labor at home,
- 19:34–19:36we will make our own society a line of progress.
- 19:36–19:38We will make our own country, America.
- 19:38–19:39That's desperate.
- 19:39–19:42It is a desperate wish to reverse the brain drain
- 19:42–19:47in the brawn drain that is actively hollowing out the cultural and economic core of the villages.
- 19:47–19:51But the poets know exactly what awaits those young men in the cities.
- 19:51–19:54They do not view urbanization as a shining beacon of progress.
- 19:54–19:58They portray the city as an extractive predatory mechanism.
- 19:58–19:59A meat grinder.
- 19:59–20:03Yeah, but instead of the cliche meat grinder, I think of it more like a massive centrifuge.
- 20:03–20:07The city spins these rural migrants at terrifying speeds, extracting their physical
- 20:07–20:10labor, their youth, and their energy.
- 20:10–20:15And once all the value has been separated out, it discards the human husk that remains.
- 20:15–20:20Devonkant's poem, Van Davy, or Forest Goddess, illustrates this perfectly.
- 20:20–20:25He tracks the tribal and rural poor who migrate to urban centers.
- 20:25–20:29The women leave the forests to sweep the marble floors of city mansions.
- 20:29–20:34The men pull heavy rickshaws through colluded streets and carry massive sacks on their backs.
- 20:34–20:37Devonkant says the city chews them up and puts them to sleep.
- 20:37–20:39It is thrilled to lick their blood.
- 20:39–20:46to lick their blood. Wow. He compares these rural migrants to raw fuel like diesel or coal
- 20:46–20:50burning up inside the engine of the city to keep the urban elite comfortable,
- 20:50–20:56only to vanish like smoke into the sky. The city is a vampire, sustaining its glittering
- 20:56–21:01skyline by draining the lifeblood of the rural poor. And the emotional devastation this causes
- 21:01–21:05for the families who remain in the village is captured in a heartbreaking poem by Rupesh
- 21:05–21:10Kamar Ha. Oh, that one is rough. The narrator is a mother who reflects on the immense sacrifices
- 21:10–21:15she made to raise her son. She starved herself so he could eat. She went without so she could buy
- 21:15–21:20him books, hoping education would break the cycle. But it doesn't. When he is grown,
- 21:20–21:26economic desperation forces him to migrate to Assam for work anyway. But he doesn't send
- 21:26–21:32money back. And when he finally returns home, the mother is horrified by his physical condition.
- 21:32–21:32Yeah.
- 21:32–21:39She says, I saw his ears red, indicating he had been slapped, beaten, and abused by employers
- 21:39–21:40in the city.
- 21:40–21:43They nurse him back to health, but poverty doesn't care if you're traumatized.
- 21:43–21:44No, it doesn't.
- 21:44–21:49Out of sheer necessity, he leaves again, this time, for Bombay.
- 21:49–21:50He makes money.
- 21:50–21:54They finally escape the grip of poverty, but the universe is unforgiving.
- 21:54–21:57He returns from Bombay, physically broken once again.
- 21:57–22:01And at this point, the mother makes a profound and terrible calculation.
- 22:01–22:05She says, I will stay hungry, but I will not send him to another's land.
- 22:05–22:09Right now, I will happily go to the village shrine and eat whatever is there.
- 22:09–22:10She chooses starvation.
- 22:10–22:15She realizes that starving in the relative safety and dignity of her own village is infinitely
- 22:15–22:19preferable to subjecting her son to the physical and spiritual violence of the urban centrifuge.
- 22:19–22:25It is crucial to note, too, that this alienation isn't strictly limited to manual laborers.
- 22:25–22:26Oh, right.
- 22:26–22:27The middle class.
- 22:27–22:28Yeah.
- 22:28–22:31voices of the educated middle-class migrants as well.
- 22:31–22:36Subba Thakur writes about a manager living far from his village.
- 22:36–22:39He has achieved the supposed dream, right?
- 22:39–22:41Comfortable corporate job, a secure income.
- 22:41–22:43But he's miserable.
- 22:43–22:44Completely.
- 22:44–22:48His internal life is consumed by a paralyzing nostalgia.
- 22:48–22:53He daydreams about the beautiful ponds of his youth, the arrival of spring, the specific
- 22:53–22:56songs the women sang during local festivals.
- 22:56–23:00body is sitting in an air-conditioned office in the city, but his soul is trapped as a
- 23:00–23:03ghost in the village he left behind.
- 23:03–23:04Exactly.
- 23:04–23:08Vibhuti Anand writes similarly about the exhaustion of the modern worker, yearning desperately
- 23:08–23:11for the quiet pace of rural life.
- 23:11–23:14This creates a terrifying paradox for you listening to consider.
- 23:14–23:15It really does.
- 23:15–23:18I want you to think about this impossible geometry.
- 23:18–23:20The village is physically starving them.
- 23:20–23:21The fields are barren.
- 23:21–23:22The landlords are abusive.
- 23:22–23:24There are no jobs.
- 23:24–23:27But the city is physically and spiritually destroying them.
- 23:27–23:31It extracts their labor, beats them, and alienates them from their culture.
- 23:31–23:33It's a lose-lose situation.
- 23:33–23:38When both staying and leaving result in destruction, where is home?
- 23:38–23:42How do you exist in a world where every geographic coordinate on the map is hostile to your
- 23:42–23:43survival?
- 23:43–23:45It creates a state of permanent exile.
- 23:45–23:48You are a refugee within your own borders.
- 23:48–23:52And historically, when humans are pushed into a corner where politics are corrupt,
- 23:52–23:58are brutal and geography offers no safe harbor, one of the primary survival mechanisms that emerges
- 23:58–24:04is dark biting satire. Yeah, if you can't cry anymore, you have to laugh. The satire of the
- 24:04–24:09videa archive is incredibly sharp. It acts as a pressure valve for all this societal dysfunction.
- 24:10–24:15Diacon's poem, Panchlach Bokehautam, which translates to five laxes the boy's price,
- 24:15–24:20is a savage take down of the dowry system. Despite legal prohibitions, the dowry system
- 24:20–24:23remains a deeply entrenched social issue.
- 24:23–24:25Diacon attacks it by utilizing the language of commerce.
- 24:25–24:27Yes, treating a person like an object.
- 24:27–24:31He treats the prospective groom not as a human being entering a sacred union,
- 24:31–24:33but as a commodity sitting on a supermarket shelf.
- 24:33–24:38He describes a boy who has no secure job, who doesn't even earn a broken cowrie.
- 24:38–24:42A cowrie was an ancient sea snail shell used as currency.
- 24:42–24:46So saying someone doesn't earn a broken cowrie means they are utterly and completely broke.
- 24:46–24:47Right.
- 24:47–24:52Yet, despite having no income, the father is sitting on his porch, calculating interest
- 24:52–24:57upon interest and demanding a price of five lakhs half a million rupees for his son's
- 24:57–24:58hand in marriage.
- 24:58–25:04And the justification for this exorbitant price, the poem states, he has done an MBA.
- 25:04–25:09The advanced degree has nothing to do with intellectual pursuit or securing a stable
- 25:09–25:10future.
- 25:10–25:14It acts merely as a metric to artificially inflate his price tag in the marriage market.
- 25:14–25:19The father acts like a feudal lord waiting for the matchmakers to bring him tribute,
- 25:19–25:23while the boy treats everyone around him with unearned arrogance just because he managed
- 25:23–25:25to land a job at a multinational company.
- 25:25–25:26It's absurd.
- 25:26–25:28The poem repeats the refrain.
- 25:28–25:30Five laxes the boy's price.
- 25:30–25:35It completely strips away any pretense of romance, compatibility, or sanctity from
- 25:35–25:40the institution of marriage, exposing it purely as a cold, raw financial transaction.
- 25:40–25:45And this transactional mindset infects every level of society.
- 25:45–25:50Kamini Kamayani explores this in her poem, Chanda, which means donation.
- 25:50–25:51Oh, that's a brilliant one.
- 25:51–25:56She examines how the noble concept of charitable giving has been utterly corrupted into a
- 25:56–25:58system of institutionalized extortion.
- 25:58–26:04She writes, the big corrupt, chase the small corrupt, and the lame follow behind.
- 26:04–26:06It's a complete food chain of bribery.
- 26:06–26:08It is exactly that.
- 26:08–26:12She points out that this endless demand for Chanda creates a jam everywhere on the roads
- 26:12–26:14in the police stations in the courts.
- 26:14–26:15It's inescapable.
- 26:15–26:20It's a system where every individual in a position of minor power is trying to squeeze
- 26:20–26:26someone beneath them for money under the guise of institutional fees or charity.
- 26:26–26:30She warns that this relentless extraction is pushing society toward a slope of great
- 26:30–26:31destruction.
- 26:31–26:35The bureaucracy required to maintain this level of corruption is suffocating.
- 26:35–26:40Anand captures the sheer soul-crushing tedium of this in his poem about lines.
- 26:40–26:41Oh the lines.
- 26:41–26:42He writes,
- 26:42–26:44Everywhere you look, there is a line.
- 26:44–26:46You stand in line for the train.
- 26:46–26:47You stand in line for the bus.
- 26:47–26:49You stand in line to get a gas cylinder.
- 26:49–26:51You stand in line for basic rations.
- 26:51–26:53A line for the doctor.
- 26:53–26:54A line for the lawyer.
- 26:54–26:56A line for the public toilet.
- 26:56–26:57A line to pray at the temple.
- 26:57–26:59A line to pray at the mosque.
- 26:59–27:02And the punchline of the poem reveals the ultimate cue.
- 27:02–27:06The biggest line is in the graveyard.
- 27:06–27:09The structure of Anand's poem is just brilliant.
- 27:09–27:15The relentless monotonous repetition of the word line mirrors the inescapable Kafkaesque
- 27:15–27:17nightmare of navigating modern bureaucracy.
- 27:17–27:20Yes, the repetition makes you feel the exhaustion.
- 27:20–27:22You are born into a queue.
- 27:22–27:26You spend the majority of your waking life waiting for basic necessities and queues,
- 27:26–27:29and you ultimately die waiting your turn in a queue.
- 27:29–27:35The individual is completely erased, reduced merely to a placeholder in an endless sequence
- 27:35–27:36of waiting.
- 27:36–27:39I'd ask you listening to think about the invisible lines in your own life.
- 27:39–27:43The old music when you're trying to fix a medical bill, the endless digital cues for
- 27:43–27:46tickets, the bureaucratic hoops you jump through just to exist.
- 27:46–27:47It's universal.
- 27:47–27:51When life is reduced to that, it makes you wonder if we are even behaving like humans
- 27:51–27:53anymore.
- 27:53–27:59Vinny Utpal takes this thought to its logical extreme in his poem Manuk Amal, Humans
- 27:59–28:00and animals.
- 28:00–28:04Utpal asks a very simple, cynical question.
- 28:04–28:06Who is actually superior?
- 28:06–28:10He notes that both humans and animals have basic biological imperatives, both have stomachs
- 28:10–28:11to fill.
- 28:11–28:16But humans will utilize deceit, elaborate trickery, and theatrical drama to acquire
- 28:16–28:19money and false prestige.
- 28:19–28:23He observes that humans, once they become financially independent and can stand on their
- 28:23–28:26own two feet, frequently abandon the very parents who raise them.
- 28:26–28:27Which is so cruel.
- 28:27–28:28The animals!
- 28:28–28:30Animals don't plot for false prestige.
- 28:30–28:34Animals, once their immediate hunger is satisfied, step aside and allow others in the pack to
- 28:34–28:35eat.
- 28:35–28:39Oatpal concludes that you really have to think hard about who is the superior species.
- 28:39–28:41The humor here is pitch black.
- 28:41–28:46These writers use satire, not just event, but to ground complex philosophical critiques
- 28:46–28:50of society in the messy reality of human behavior.
- 28:50–28:51It keeps it grounded.
- 28:51–28:54It prevents the archive from becoming just an exhausting litany of despair.
- 28:54–29:00However, it is vital to recognize that amid the political critique, the anger over poverty
- 29:00–29:06and the biting satire, the Vedea archive never forgets what it is fundamentally trying to
- 29:06–29:07save.
- 29:07–29:08Right.
- 29:08–29:10It isn't just a catalog of misery and corruption.
- 29:10–29:16It is the repository of a rich, vibrant, and incredibly tender cultural heritage.
- 29:16–29:21Because if you only read the political and satirical poems, you might walk away thinking
- 29:21–29:26Methillo was just a landscape of suffering. But then you encounter the work of contributors
- 29:26–29:31like Omej Mandal. Mandal's work is beautiful. He dedicated himself to meticulously collecting
- 29:31–29:37traditional Sohar songs. Sohar songs are folk songs traditionally sung by women to celebrate
- 29:37–29:42pregnancy and childbirth. These are entirely oral traditions. For centuries they have been passed
- 29:42–29:47down from mother to daughter, sung collectively in the courtyards, often accompanied by the
- 29:47–29:51rhythm of daily chores like the grinding of spices on a stone or the application of oil.
- 29:51–29:55Mandol includes specific songs for the different stages of pregnancy,
- 29:55–29:57from the first month all the way to the tenth.
- 29:57–30:02The lyrics are incredibly intimate. They sing about the physical pains of carrying a child,
- 30:02–30:06the strange cravings, the shifting power dynamics with the mother-in-law,
- 30:06–30:11the deep longing for a husband who might be far away working in one of those cities we talked
- 30:11–30:17about earlier. Exactly. One lyric says, my body has become pale like a mustard flower.
- 30:18–30:24And the editorial goal behind capturing these songs is explicit and urgent. The editor understands
- 30:24–30:29that the forces of globalization, the very rural to urban migration we analyzed,
- 30:29–30:33are actively dismantling these traditions. Yes, the social fabric is changing.
- 30:33–30:38As extended families fracture and young people move to small apartments in distant cities,
- 30:38–30:42the communal courtyards where these songs were sung and learned are disappearing.
- 30:42–30:44The mechanism of oral transmission is breaking down.
- 30:44–30:48If these songs aren't written down, if they aren't encoded into unicode,
- 30:48–30:52they vanish the exact moment the last woman who remembers the melody passes away.
- 30:52–30:53It's a race against time.
- 30:53–30:58By placing these intimate songs into a five million word digital database alongside
- 30:58–31:02political manifestos, Bidea is ensuring that a thousand years from now,
- 31:02–31:07someone can find the exact song a Mothuly mother saying in the seventh month of her pregnancy
- 31:07–31:14in 2009. It is an act of profound love and a massive act of defiance against cultural erasure.
- 31:14–31:18Defiance takes many shapes in this archive. Sometimes it's political, sometimes it's preservation,
- 31:18–31:23and sometimes it takes the shape of incredibly unique audacious aspirations.
- 31:23–31:28Which perfectly sets up one of my absolute favorite pieces in this entire collection,
- 31:28–31:33B.K. Carnes' poem demanding an Olympic medal for Mathila. It is such a brilliant piece of
- 31:33–31:37of writing. It weaves geographical trauma with global ambition.
- 31:37–31:40To understand the poem, you have to understand the geography.
- 31:40–31:43The Matelibah region is cursed by the Kosy River.
- 31:43–31:45The Kosy is often called the sorrow of Bihar.
- 31:45–31:48Because of the massive amount of silt it carries from the Halei
- 31:48–31:50is, the river constantly shifts its course,
- 31:50–31:51overwhelming embankments.
- 31:51–31:54And causing catastrophic flooding almost annually.
- 31:54–31:58It wipes out homes, agriculture, and lives.
- 31:58–32:00It is an enduring trauma for the region.
- 32:00–32:02Karn acknowledges this devastation,
- 32:02–32:04but he flips the narrative entirely.
- 32:04–32:07He looks at great global athletes,
- 32:07–32:09Sachin Tendulkar in cricket,
- 32:09–32:12Viswanathanand in chess, Abhinavendra winning gold
- 32:12–32:14in shooting, and he states,
- 32:14–32:17I am looking for an Olympic medal for Mathila.
- 32:17–32:21And his logic for how they will achieve this is amazing.
- 32:21–32:23He points out that because of the terrifying
- 32:23–32:25unpredictable floods of the Coasea River,
- 32:25–32:27the local children are forced to become
- 32:27–32:30master swimmers simply to survive.
- 32:30–32:33They learn to navigate treacherous floodwaters just to stay alive.
- 32:33–32:38Therefore, Karn concludes, when the next Olympics roll around, a boy from Methila who has survived
- 32:38–32:43the cozy floods is going to dive into the pool and absolutely defeat heavily trained
- 32:43–32:45Olympic champions like Michael Phelps.
- 32:45–32:47We will beat Phelps, he declares.
- 32:47–32:50What Karn is doing here is performing an incredible alchemy.
- 32:50–32:53He is turning regional trauma into global ambition.
- 32:53–32:54Yes.
- 32:54–32:58He suggests that the resilience built by surviving natural disasters, the sheer grit
- 32:58–33:03required to avoid drowning in your own backyard is exactly the kind of superhuman strength required
- 33:03–33:08for global athletic triumph. It is a powerful metaphor for the region and the language itself.
- 33:09–33:14Karna is basically saying we've been flooded by the river, we have been ignored by the politicians,
- 33:14–33:20our language has been sidelined by modernization, but that struggle hasn't destroyed us. No,
- 33:20–33:25it made them stronger. It has made us strong enough to take on the entire world and win gold.
- 33:25–33:30It's the ultimate underdog anthem. We learned to swim so we wouldn't die, now
- 33:30–33:34hand over the medal. It perfectly encapsulates the spirit of the entire
- 33:34–33:38Vedeja project, taking the hardships, the marginalization and the ancient
- 33:38–33:43traditions, and demanding a permanent undeniable place on the global digital
- 33:43–33:47stage. Let's take a breath and pull all these threads together. We've gone
- 33:47–33:52deep into this 2009-2010 linguistic time capsule. It's been quite a journey.
- 33:52–33:56We started by examining the sheer technological audacity required to digitize
- 33:56–34:021,100 pages of decaying palm leaf manuscripts and create a five million word internet corpus
- 34:02–34:08Dragging an ancient script into the Unicode era so could be recognized by the modern web and in the politics right
- 34:08–34:12We felt the raw political outrage of a marginalized people in the car eye
- 34:13–34:20Demanding their constitutional rights. We explored the granular agony of poverty where the myth of meritocracy dies and
- 34:20–34:22and mothers are treated as malfunctioning machinery.
- 34:22–34:25We track the tragic centrifuge of migration,
- 34:25–34:28pulling youth into cities that extract their labor and spit them out.
- 34:28–34:32We laughed at the dark satire exposing the greed of the dowry system
- 34:32–34:36and the Kafkaesque nightmare of endless bureaucratic lines.
- 34:36–34:40And finally, we witnessed the tender preservation of mothers' folk songs
- 34:40–34:44and the fierce hope of turning flood trauma into Olympic glory.
- 34:44–34:47While these sources are intricately specific, written in the Mithili language,
- 34:47–34:53rooted in the geography of the Mithlema-Hesh regions dealing with local Nepalese politicians
- 34:53–34:58and the Kosi River, the struggles they document are universally human.
- 34:58–34:59Universally human, yes.
- 34:59–35:04The fight to maintain your identity against the steamroller of globalization.
- 35:04–35:08The agonizing divide between the rural home and the urban workplace.
- 35:08–35:12The deep disillusionment with the political class that serves its own interests.
- 35:12–35:17Videha captured these universal themes with astonishing clarity and raw emotion at
- 35:17–35:20a very specific juncture in the digital age.
- 35:20–35:23We started this deep dive by talking about the difference between a static museum and
- 35:23–35:27a living, chaotic digital archive.
- 35:27–35:31We've spent this time looking at how a specific community scrambled to digitize its soul,
- 35:31–35:36aggressively fighting off plagiarists and technological obsolescence to save their culture from disappearing.
- 35:36–35:37Yeah.
- 35:37–35:40But I want to turn that lens on you listening.
- 35:40–35:41Think about your own family's history.
- 35:41–35:46The specific dialects are slang your grandparents use, the inside jokes, the recipes that
- 35:46–35:50are only stored in someone's memory. The story is told around your kitchen table.
- 35:50–35:54In a hundred years, when the internet has evolved into a medium, we can't even recognize who
- 35:54–35:57is building the digital arc for your heritage.
Plain text
यह आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आ� आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आप आ� आ And suddenly, that glass case is just completely shattered. We're looking at a preservation landscape today that is incredibly messy, chaotic, and loud. It really is the absolute definition of a cultural battleground. It is. So today, we have a stack of sources that is quite frankly mind-blowing. We're going to be looking at excerpts from the 2009 to 2010 print anthology of Videa. Right, which was a massive undertaking. Right. For context for you listening, Videha is the first ever Mathili Fortnightly e-journal. And our mission for this deep dive is to explore how a grassroots digital literature movement acts as both a time capsule preserving an ancient culture and at the exact same time a megaphone for raw unfiltered socio-political critique. And to really set the scene for you we have to understand the staggering scale of the Videha project. Yeah let's get into those numbers. Looking at the editor's note, this is by Gajendra Thakur. In the 2009 to 2010 volume, you realize this isn't a simple newsletter put together by a few hobbyists. No, not at all. It's a monumental linguistic resurrection. I mean, at the time of this publication, they had already released 50 issues. 50 issues. Okay, let's unpack this setup. We're looking at a digital archive that bridges ancient palm leaf manuscripts and 21st century internet culture. And why does this matter to you? because it's a masterclass in how a community fights to keep its soul alive in a rapidly changing world. It's about what happens when an ancient language crashes headfirst into the Unicode era. And to understand the magnitude of that crash, we really need to look at the numbers PACCOR provides. They built a 5 million word Mothelli Internet corpus. 5 million words? That's just wild! It's huge! They published 6,000 pages of new literature. 6,000. And perhaps most astonishingly, they digitized 1,100 pages of ancient palm leaf and other manuscripts. Wow. Yeah, translating them from the ancient mytholoxure script into the modern Devanagari script. I want to link around that physical labor for a moment because, I mean, imagine 1,100 pages of palm leaves. Palm leaves are organic matter. They rot. Exactly, they degrade. They are susceptible to the intense humidity of South Asia to insects, to simple friction. Just touching them can damage them. Right, so you are taking something physically decaying, written in a script in methyloxchar that fewer and fewer people can even decipher today, and you are hard-coding it into the digital DNA of the internet. It's a massive rescue operation. It reminds me of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, you know, where scientists lock away seeds in the arctic ice to protect global agriculture from a doomsday scenario. But here, they are doing it for an entire culture's literary heritage. That's a great comparison. And the technological context of 2009 is critical to appreciate what they actually accomplished here. Yeah, tell me about that because the internet was very different back then. It was. The editor mentions that their work on the Videa archive actually formed the basis for publishing the very first Unicode print book in Mayfili. Oh well. Yeah, just a year prior in 2008, and bringing a regional language into the Unicode standard that is a profound technological leap. Because before Unico, you couldn't just type it, right? Exactly. Before Unicode standardization, if you wanted to put a regional language on the internet, you often had to create a custom font. The text wasn't encoded as distinct letters in the computer's underlying architecture. So it was just a picture. Basically, yeah, it was a rendering trick. This meant search engines like Google couldn't read it at all. You couldn't copy, paste, or search the text. The text was essentially a ghost in the machine. Like a picture of a word rather than the data of the word itself. Precisely. Entering the Unicode standard is digital legitimization. That makes total sense. It means your language has a permanent, mathematically recognized address on the internet. It transforms a language from an unsearchable image file into data that algorithms can parse, index, and archive indefinitely. So they were dragging this ancient language into the 21st century so it could actually participate in the global digital infrastructure. Right. And they didn't stop at the internet either. No, they didn't. The source highlights that they created the first Mathili Braille book. Yeah, a novel by Sahasbathin. Right, released in 2009 and sent to a blind school in Darbanga. This tells me their definition of preservation wasn't just about saving old texts for academics. No, it was much broader. It was about radical accessibility. Absolutely. They were operating across digital text, audio, and video. The archive mentions over 100 hours of video including full plays, children's cartoons, and traditional Mathila paintings. That's a whole multimedia ecosystem. It is, and integrating Braille into this ecosystem proves that for the people behind Vidaea, accessibility was a core philosophy. They recognize that a language only survives if every single member of the community, regardless of physical ability or technological access, can participate in it. That level of inclusion is inspiring. I have to ask the difficult question here. Sure, go ahead. We see this massive digitization effort happening in 2009, but isn't there a severe risk involved? What kind of risk? When you take localized oral traditions, when you take a sacred text written on a palm leaf by a scholar centuries ago, and you upload it to a global server farm, do you sanitize it? Oh, I see what you mean. Yeah, taking an artifact out of its geographical and ritualistic context and flattening it onto a glowing screen. Doesn't that fundamentally change the nature of the culture itself? There's a genuine anxiety that in saving the data, you lose the soul. That anxiety plagues literally every digital preservation project. How do you keep the authenticity intact when the medium is so drastically altered? Gajendra Thakura actually addresses this, but not through some lofty philosophical essay. No, he goes hard. addresses it through rigid, almost aggressive enforcement of authenticity boundaries. The ban list. Yes, the ban list. The editor explicitly includes a notice about a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism in his introductory note. And he doesn't just issue a vague warning. No, he names specific individuals, he lists their various aliases and incredibly publishes their actual IP addresses. Publishing IP addresses in 2009. I mean, that is aggressive digital policing. He is literally acting as the bouncer at the door of this newly built digital museum. He had to. He caught people stealing the work of prominent authors, people like Douglas Kellner from UCLA and the Hindi poet Arun Kamal. He even publishes a direct email from Douglas Kellner in the text thanking him for the detective work. I loved reading that email in the text. It's just like, dear Gachendra, thanks for the detective work. Was there a response? Best regards, Douglas Kellner. Yeah, very casual. It is so matter of fact, but it reveals a fierce protection of intellectual property. Because often regional languages and grassroots digital platforms are viewed by bad actors as a wild west. Oh, absolutely. A place to scrape content. Right. A place where content can be scraped, translated, and stolen without consequence because they think no one is watching. But Taqour was watching. By policing plagiarism so strictly, the Vedea editorial board was sending a clear message. Mathili literature on the internet has intrinsic value. Yes. It commands respect and it has ownership. They were setting the terms of their digital existence, ensuring that moving into the Unicode era didn't mean diluting their cultural output. And because this digital archive locked in their cultural identity and fiercely protected its borders, it naturally became a safe haven. A place for writers to express the kind of raw, unfiltered sentiment that mainstream state-run media often ignores or sanitizes. Definitely. Which leads us to look at what of 2009 and 2010 were actually saying once they had this platform. And the answer is they were incredibly angry. The political poetry in this archive is blistering. Now before we analyze these specific poems, we really need to frame how we are approaching this. That's important, yes. When we look at these highly charged political texts regarding the Matesha movement in the Paul and regional politics, we have to read them as historians reading a thermometer. We aren't here to validate the politics of the movement. Right. the severe critiques of the leaders mentioned, our job is simply to impartially observe the raw political temperature of the Mathili writers at that exact moment in time, and to convey the ideas from the source material to you listening. Exactly, and that thermometer was practically shattering from the heat. Yeah, it really was. To understand the context, the Terai region, also known as Madhash, is the southern plains of Nepal. Historically, the people there felt deeply disenfranchised. Underrepresented in the state apparatus. Right, and economically marginalized compared to the Hill-Centric political elite in Kathmandu. So in the late 2000s, following the end of the Nepalese Civil War and the Hanarchy, the Madhash movement just erupted. It was a massive demand for change. It was a demand for federalism, proportional representation, and basic human dignity. And that historical friction is captured perfectly by Mahendra Kumar Mishra. He was actually a former member of parliament in Nepal. He was, yeah. and he writes with absolute disgust toward the political elite. He calls out leaders by name Girija Prasad Kaurala, Madhav Kamar Nepal, Pushpaka Maldahal, who is known as Prachanda. Mishra's poem is just a searing indictment of a compromise revolution. He asks this devastating rhetorical question. He says, Why do you need democracy? Since democracy has now vanished, enjoy your loot. Enjoy your loot. Wow. He accuses the politicians of ignoring the rights of the people and just filling their bags. The imagery is so vivid. It really is. He says, Miesola is crying in shame looking at their deeds. It's the pain of someone who believed in a political transformation, only to feel that the new leaders are simply a different set of rulers, extracting wealth from the same vulnerable population. And then Amkumar Jha takes that sentiment and pushes it into the realm of direct threat against the establishment. Yeah, his poem is intense. The title of his poem translates to an urgent call to action. He writes, the blood of the 25 martyrs is saying, wake up, Madheshi, wake up. Referring to the casualties during the intense protests. Right, and Jaa accuses the leaders of severe deceit. He compares them to Hiranyakashipu. A demon king in Hindu mythology, right? Exactly, known for his sheer arrogance and cruelty. The mythological parallel is powerful. He is saying the state is operating with demonic cruelty, holding a gun to kill the Madheshis. but Shaw's core message is that the movement is an unstoppable awakening. Yes, an awakened. He writes, by taking the votes of the Tyrian Medeshes, the rulers moved ahead, leaving the Medeshes to fight. He is articulating the deep frustration of being used as a convenient voting block to gain power, and then being immediately discarded once the elections are over. This theme of a mass, unstoppable awakening echoes really loudly in Dr. Surrenderlav's poem, Inquilab, which translates to revolution. Hove, alwa. Love's imagery is practically apocalyptic. He writes, the storm has risen, the fire has risen, every house is on fire. He talks about a total mobilization of society. The youth have risen, the women have risen. He even says the graveyard has risen. Yeah, that line gave me chills. The blood in the veins is boiling. The fist of revolution is raised. What strikes me about these poems is the sheer immediacy of them. State histories, written decades later, tend to smooth out the edges of political movement. They sanitize them. Exactly. They turn violent desperate struggles into neat chapters about constitutional transitions. But reading these poems in the Vidae archive, you aren't reading a sanitized summary. You are feeling the exact pulse of the people in the streets in 2009. It acts as a real-time ledger of public sentiment. But what makes this archive so comprehensive is that it doesn't just focus on the high-level political betrayal. No, it goes much deeper. The poets understand that this political anger isn't happening in a vacuum. The rage directed at politicians is fundamentally fueled by systemic, crushing economic realities. The failure of the state is felt most acutely in the stomach. Right. And the transition from the political poems to the poems exploring poverty is profound. The political pieces are loud, mobilizing, and public. Very public. But when the poets write about the class divide, the tone shifts to something quiet, and absolutely devastating. They break down the mechanics of poverty at the most granular level. Roshan Janakpuri's poem, Chapal and Sedak, which means slippers in the road is a brilliant exploration of class disparity through sensory details. Round of melting slippers. He paints a picture of worn out slippers melting on a scorching road, which represents the poor laborer. And he contrasts those decaying slippers with the polished shoes of the rich. Janakpuri notes a dangerous alchemy happening there. The blistering heat of the road beneath the slipper, combined with the heat of an empty stomach, creates a volcano. That's a great way to put it. He writes, the belly of my slipper wearing mother is still empty, the stove is still cold and her eyes are filled with outrage. The contrast between the cold stove and the hot anger perfectly encapsulates the daily tension of the impoverished. The physical environment is hostile and the domestic space offers absolutely no relief. But nothing in this entire archive arrested me, quite like Dr. Shanku Kumar Singh's lullaby. It's simply titled, Lori. Oh man, that one is a master class in dark irony. It really is. It's written from the perspective of a child speaking to their mother. The child says, you sing a lullaby and I will sleep. I am hungry, my body is shivering from the cold. The mother has no food, no blanket, only her voice to offer as a distraction. But then the child points at a scene occurring outside their immediate misery. The child says, look there in that car, a white dog is roaming, eating milk and rice. A human child is shivering and starving, acutely aware that a wealthy person's pet is being fed delicacies. Milk and rice. Right. Milk and refs his comfort food off in a luxury and severe poverty. The child is watching an animal receive the exact sustenance and warmth they are being denied. And then the child asks a haunting question. Is it a crime to be human? That line hits so hard. It is a searing indictment of a society's misplaced values. When animals belonging to the elite are treated with more dignity and care than the human children of the poor, the moral compass of that society hadn't just drifted. It has completely shattered. Absolutely shattered. And the mother is totally powerless. Her only response is the continued lullaby. You sing a lullaby, I will sleep, mother. We see the mechanics of this systemic cruelty laid bare in another piece too, Rupadiru's poem, Pizaf Pita, or labor pain. This poem explores the violent intersection of extreme poverty, gender, and the feudal landlord system. It describes a woman who goes into labor while actively working in the agricultural fields. She gives birth to a son right there in the dirt. And for a fleeting tragic moment, she experiences a sense of hope. She does. She thinks her son will grow up to share the crushing burden of physical labor. But his hands might eventually help them avoid taking on crippling debt just to survive another season. But the economic reality suffocates that hope instantly. Because she has just given birth, she requires basic sustenance to recover. So she goes to the landlord's house, asking for a small portion of rice and lentils. And the landlord's response is a display of absolute dehumanization. He doesn't merely refuse her the food, he verbally attacks her. He yells at her, essentially asking if she thinks she's a queen who deserves luxury. A queen. She just gave birth in the dirt. Right. He demands to know why she is resting instead of working on the very day she gave birth. The landlord strips her of her biological reality entirely. In his eyes, she's not a human mother who has just undergone a massive physical trauma. No. She's purely a unit of agricultural labor. By needing to rest, she is viewed as a machine that is momentarily malfunctioning and costing him productivity. It's horrific. These poems document a level of exploitation that official economic reports, the ones which just measure GDP and trade deficits, completely fail to capture. They measure the emotional and physical toll of the class divide. Exactly. And think about the narratives we are constantly fed about success today. We are sold the idea of the meritocracy. Oh sure, put your head down, work hard. Maintain your integrity and society will reward you. Upendravagat Nagvanshi dismantles that narrative completely in his poem, Boudwa, which focuses on an old man navigating this corrupt system. The old man wrestles with temptation, asking himself, should I steal, should I commit robbery, pickpocket? No, I will work honestly. He chooses the moral high ground. He works grueling hours to earn his honest wages. But the poem revealed the crushing mathematical reality of his honest. It doesn't add up. His meager wages simply cannot buy enough food to fill the stomachs of his five family members. His physical body is literally melting away from the relentless labor. His children look at him and ask what he has actually done for them, completely oblivious to his moral victory. Because a moral victory doesn't put food on the table. Right. The poem ends with the old man muttering to himself, starving. In a thoroughly corrupt system, honesty is not a virtue that leaves to reward. It is a rapid path to starvation. And when honesty and backbreaking labor in your native village only yield starvation and abuse from landlords, a demographic inevitability occurs. Migration. Exactly. When staying mean starving, you have to leave. The massive demographic shift from rural Mithila to urban centers across India and to the Gulf states is a defining feature of the region's modern history. The poets in the Vidae archive document this rural exodus not as an exciting pursuit of global opportunity, but as a profound tragedy. It's a loss. Amrindra Yadav writes a direct plea to the youth. He addresses them using common names, Dina Badri, Krishna Ram Sobaran, which serve as stand-dose for all the young men who have boarded trains for Punjab, or flights to the deserts of Saudi Arabia and the slums of Bombay. The imagery Yadav uses to describe the village left behind is haunting. He writes, here in your home, your five-monde hoe is crying in the corner. That's such a striking image. Just to clarify, Amand is a traditional unit of weight, making this a heavy, vital agricultural tool. And it is just rusting away, personified as weeping in the corner. He tells them, your fields are becoming barren, your cattle sheds are empty. He is begging them to return, promising that if they apply their labor at home, we will make our own society a line of progress. We will make our own country, America. That's desperate. It is a desperate wish to reverse the brain drain in the brawn drain that is actively hollowing out the cultural and economic core of the villages. But the poets know exactly what awaits those young men in the cities. They do not view urbanization as a shining beacon of progress. They portray the city as an extractive predatory mechanism. A meat grinder. Yeah, but instead of the cliche meat grinder, I think of it more like a massive centrifuge. The city spins these rural migrants at terrifying speeds, extracting their physical labor, their youth, and their energy. And once all the value has been separated out, it discards the human husk that remains. Devonkant's poem, Van Davy, or Forest Goddess, illustrates this perfectly. He tracks the tribal and rural poor who migrate to urban centers. The women leave the forests to sweep the marble floors of city mansions. The men pull heavy rickshaws through colluded streets and carry massive sacks on their backs. Devonkant says the city chews them up and puts them to sleep. It is thrilled to lick their blood. to lick their blood. Wow. He compares these rural migrants to raw fuel like diesel or coal burning up inside the engine of the city to keep the urban elite comfortable, only to vanish like smoke into the sky. The city is a vampire, sustaining its glittering skyline by draining the lifeblood of the rural poor. And the emotional devastation this causes for the families who remain in the village is captured in a heartbreaking poem by Rupesh Kamar Ha. Oh, that one is rough. The narrator is a mother who reflects on the immense sacrifices she made to raise her son. She starved herself so he could eat. She went without so she could buy him books, hoping education would break the cycle. But it doesn't. When he is grown, economic desperation forces him to migrate to Assam for work anyway. But he doesn't send money back. And when he finally returns home, the mother is horrified by his physical condition. Yeah. She says, I saw his ears red, indicating he had been slapped, beaten, and abused by employers in the city. They nurse him back to health, but poverty doesn't care if you're traumatized. No, it doesn't. Out of sheer necessity, he leaves again, this time, for Bombay. He makes money. They finally escape the grip of poverty, but the universe is unforgiving. He returns from Bombay, physically broken once again. And at this point, the mother makes a profound and terrible calculation. She says, I will stay hungry, but I will not send him to another's land. Right now, I will happily go to the village shrine and eat whatever is there. She chooses starvation. She realizes that starving in the relative safety and dignity of her own village is infinitely preferable to subjecting her son to the physical and spiritual violence of the urban centrifuge. It is crucial to note, too, that this alienation isn't strictly limited to manual laborers. Oh, right. The middle class. Yeah. voices of the educated middle-class migrants as well. Subba Thakur writes about a manager living far from his village. He has achieved the supposed dream, right? Comfortable corporate job, a secure income. But he's miserable. Completely. His internal life is consumed by a paralyzing nostalgia. He daydreams about the beautiful ponds of his youth, the arrival of spring, the specific songs the women sang during local festivals. body is sitting in an air-conditioned office in the city, but his soul is trapped as a ghost in the village he left behind. Exactly. Vibhuti Anand writes similarly about the exhaustion of the modern worker, yearning desperately for the quiet pace of rural life. This creates a terrifying paradox for you listening to consider. It really does. I want you to think about this impossible geometry. The village is physically starving them. The fields are barren. The landlords are abusive. There are no jobs. But the city is physically and spiritually destroying them. It extracts their labor, beats them, and alienates them from their culture. It's a lose-lose situation. When both staying and leaving result in destruction, where is home? How do you exist in a world where every geographic coordinate on the map is hostile to your survival? It creates a state of permanent exile. You are a refugee within your own borders. And historically, when humans are pushed into a corner where politics are corrupt, are brutal and geography offers no safe harbor, one of the primary survival mechanisms that emerges is dark biting satire. Yeah, if you can't cry anymore, you have to laugh. The satire of the videa archive is incredibly sharp. It acts as a pressure valve for all this societal dysfunction. Diacon's poem, Panchlach Bokehautam, which translates to five laxes the boy's price, is a savage take down of the dowry system. Despite legal prohibitions, the dowry system remains a deeply entrenched social issue. Diacon attacks it by utilizing the language of commerce. Yes, treating a person like an object. He treats the prospective groom not as a human being entering a sacred union, but as a commodity sitting on a supermarket shelf. He describes a boy who has no secure job, who doesn't even earn a broken cowrie. A cowrie was an ancient sea snail shell used as currency. So saying someone doesn't earn a broken cowrie means they are utterly and completely broke. Right. Yet, despite having no income, the father is sitting on his porch, calculating interest upon interest and demanding a price of five lakhs half a million rupees for his son's hand in marriage. And the justification for this exorbitant price, the poem states, he has done an MBA. The advanced degree has nothing to do with intellectual pursuit or securing a stable future. It acts merely as a metric to artificially inflate his price tag in the marriage market. The father acts like a feudal lord waiting for the matchmakers to bring him tribute, while the boy treats everyone around him with unearned arrogance just because he managed to land a job at a multinational company. It's absurd. The poem repeats the refrain. Five laxes the boy's price. It completely strips away any pretense of romance, compatibility, or sanctity from the institution of marriage, exposing it purely as a cold, raw financial transaction. And this transactional mindset infects every level of society. Kamini Kamayani explores this in her poem, Chanda, which means donation. Oh, that's a brilliant one. She examines how the noble concept of charitable giving has been utterly corrupted into a system of institutionalized extortion. She writes, the big corrupt, chase the small corrupt, and the lame follow behind. It's a complete food chain of bribery. It is exactly that. She points out that this endless demand for Chanda creates a jam everywhere on the roads in the police stations in the courts. It's inescapable. It's a system where every individual in a position of minor power is trying to squeeze someone beneath them for money under the guise of institutional fees or charity. She warns that this relentless extraction is pushing society toward a slope of great destruction. The bureaucracy required to maintain this level of corruption is suffocating. Anand captures the sheer soul-crushing tedium of this in his poem about lines. Oh the lines. He writes, Everywhere you look, there is a line. You stand in line for the train. You stand in line for the bus. You stand in line to get a gas cylinder. You stand in line for basic rations. A line for the doctor. A line for the lawyer. A line for the public toilet. A line to pray at the temple. A line to pray at the mosque. And the punchline of the poem reveals the ultimate cue. The biggest line is in the graveyard. The structure of Anand's poem is just brilliant. The relentless monotonous repetition of the word line mirrors the inescapable Kafkaesque nightmare of navigating modern bureaucracy. Yes, the repetition makes you feel the exhaustion. You are born into a queue. You spend the majority of your waking life waiting for basic necessities and queues, and you ultimately die waiting your turn in a queue. The individual is completely erased, reduced merely to a placeholder in an endless sequence of waiting. I'd ask you listening to think about the invisible lines in your own life. The old music when you're trying to fix a medical bill, the endless digital cues for tickets, the bureaucratic hoops you jump through just to exist. It's universal. When life is reduced to that, it makes you wonder if we are even behaving like humans anymore. Vinny Utpal takes this thought to its logical extreme in his poem Manuk Amal, Humans and animals. Utpal asks a very simple, cynical question. Who is actually superior? He notes that both humans and animals have basic biological imperatives, both have stomachs to fill. But humans will utilize deceit, elaborate trickery, and theatrical drama to acquire money and false prestige. He observes that humans, once they become financially independent and can stand on their own two feet, frequently abandon the very parents who raise them. Which is so cruel. The animals! Animals don't plot for false prestige. Animals, once their immediate hunger is satisfied, step aside and allow others in the pack to eat. Oatpal concludes that you really have to think hard about who is the superior species. The humor here is pitch black. These writers use satire, not just event, but to ground complex philosophical critiques of society in the messy reality of human behavior. It keeps it grounded. It prevents the archive from becoming just an exhausting litany of despair. However, it is vital to recognize that amid the political critique, the anger over poverty and the biting satire, the Vedea archive never forgets what it is fundamentally trying to save. Right. It isn't just a catalog of misery and corruption. It is the repository of a rich, vibrant, and incredibly tender cultural heritage. Because if you only read the political and satirical poems, you might walk away thinking Methillo was just a landscape of suffering. But then you encounter the work of contributors like Omej Mandal. Mandal's work is beautiful. He dedicated himself to meticulously collecting traditional Sohar songs. Sohar songs are folk songs traditionally sung by women to celebrate pregnancy and childbirth. These are entirely oral traditions. For centuries they have been passed down from mother to daughter, sung collectively in the courtyards, often accompanied by the rhythm of daily chores like the grinding of spices on a stone or the application of oil. Mandol includes specific songs for the different stages of pregnancy, from the first month all the way to the tenth. The lyrics are incredibly intimate. They sing about the physical pains of carrying a child, the strange cravings, the shifting power dynamics with the mother-in-law, the deep longing for a husband who might be far away working in one of those cities we talked about earlier. Exactly. One lyric says, my body has become pale like a mustard flower. And the editorial goal behind capturing these songs is explicit and urgent. The editor understands that the forces of globalization, the very rural to urban migration we analyzed, are actively dismantling these traditions. Yes, the social fabric is changing. As extended families fracture and young people move to small apartments in distant cities, the communal courtyards where these songs were sung and learned are disappearing. The mechanism of oral transmission is breaking down. If these songs aren't written down, if they aren't encoded into unicode, they vanish the exact moment the last woman who remembers the melody passes away. It's a race against time. By placing these intimate songs into a five million word digital database alongside political manifestos, Bidea is ensuring that a thousand years from now, someone can find the exact song a Mothuly mother saying in the seventh month of her pregnancy in 2009. It is an act of profound love and a massive act of defiance against cultural erasure. Defiance takes many shapes in this archive. Sometimes it's political, sometimes it's preservation, and sometimes it takes the shape of incredibly unique audacious aspirations. Which perfectly sets up one of my absolute favorite pieces in this entire collection, B.K. Carnes' poem demanding an Olympic medal for Mathila. It is such a brilliant piece of of writing. It weaves geographical trauma with global ambition. To understand the poem, you have to understand the geography. The Matelibah region is cursed by the Kosy River. The Kosy is often called the sorrow of Bihar. Because of the massive amount of silt it carries from the Halei is, the river constantly shifts its course, overwhelming embankments. And causing catastrophic flooding almost annually. It wipes out homes, agriculture, and lives. It is an enduring trauma for the region. Karn acknowledges this devastation, but he flips the narrative entirely. He looks at great global athletes, Sachin Tendulkar in cricket, Viswanathanand in chess, Abhinavendra winning gold in shooting, and he states, I am looking for an Olympic medal for Mathila. And his logic for how they will achieve this is amazing. He points out that because of the terrifying unpredictable floods of the Coasea River, the local children are forced to become master swimmers simply to survive. They learn to navigate treacherous floodwaters just to stay alive. Therefore, Karn concludes, when the next Olympics roll around, a boy from Methila who has survived the cozy floods is going to dive into the pool and absolutely defeat heavily trained Olympic champions like Michael Phelps. We will beat Phelps, he declares. What Karn is doing here is performing an incredible alchemy. He is turning regional trauma into global ambition. Yes. He suggests that the resilience built by surviving natural disasters, the sheer grit required to avoid drowning in your own backyard is exactly the kind of superhuman strength required for global athletic triumph. It is a powerful metaphor for the region and the language itself. Karna is basically saying we've been flooded by the river, we have been ignored by the politicians, our language has been sidelined by modernization, but that struggle hasn't destroyed us. No, it made them stronger. It has made us strong enough to take on the entire world and win gold. It's the ultimate underdog anthem. We learned to swim so we wouldn't die, now hand over the medal. It perfectly encapsulates the spirit of the entire Vedeja project, taking the hardships, the marginalization and the ancient traditions, and demanding a permanent undeniable place on the global digital stage. Let's take a breath and pull all these threads together. We've gone deep into this 2009-2010 linguistic time capsule. It's been quite a journey. We started by examining the sheer technological audacity required to digitize 1,100 pages of decaying palm leaf manuscripts and create a five million word internet corpus Dragging an ancient script into the Unicode era so could be recognized by the modern web and in the politics right We felt the raw political outrage of a marginalized people in the car eye Demanding their constitutional rights. We explored the granular agony of poverty where the myth of meritocracy dies and and mothers are treated as malfunctioning machinery. We track the tragic centrifuge of migration, pulling youth into cities that extract their labor and spit them out. We laughed at the dark satire exposing the greed of the dowry system and the Kafkaesque nightmare of endless bureaucratic lines. And finally, we witnessed the tender preservation of mothers' folk songs and the fierce hope of turning flood trauma into Olympic glory. While these sources are intricately specific, written in the Mithili language, rooted in the geography of the Mithlema-Hesh regions dealing with local Nepalese politicians and the Kosi River, the struggles they document are universally human. Universally human, yes. The fight to maintain your identity against the steamroller of globalization. The agonizing divide between the rural home and the urban workplace. The deep disillusionment with the political class that serves its own interests. Videha captured these universal themes with astonishing clarity and raw emotion at a very specific juncture in the digital age. We started this deep dive by talking about the difference between a static museum and a living, chaotic digital archive. We've spent this time looking at how a specific community scrambled to digitize its soul, aggressively fighting off plagiarists and technological obsolescence to save their culture from disappearing. Yeah. But I want to turn that lens on you listening. Think about your own family's history. The specific dialects are slang your grandparents use, the inside jokes, the recipes that are only stored in someone's memory. The story is told around your kitchen table. In a hundred years, when the internet has evolved into a medium, we can't even recognize who is building the digital arc for your heritage.