MACHINE ASR ACCESSIBILITY AID

Episode1_Part2_RadioPlay.mp3

Not an editorially verified transcript. This text was generated automatically from the preserved recording and may contain recognition, language-detection, spelling, segmentation or name errors. Consult the source recording for authoritative content.

Collection: Part 10 · VIDEHA MITHILA MAITHILI DISCUSSION CRITICISM SERIES PART 10
Status: asr-draft
Human verified: No
Editorial review: not-reviewed
ASR model: small
Detected language: en (0.986812)
Duration: 29:09
Source: Open preserved recording

Timestamped machine output

0:04–0:37गंजिसा उपड्याया अनावियन्याय, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टम
0:37–0:42Yaya, who initiated Navya-Nyaya, the new logic, in the 14th century and completely transformed
0:42–0:47the direction, condition, and analytical method of Indian philosophy point superscript one
0:47–0:52is timeless and immortal work, the Tattvasintmai, the jewel of thought on the nature of things,
0:52–0:58proved to be a milestone not only for Nyaya philosophy but for the whole of Indian epistemology.
0:58–1:03In its light, every later philosophical school, whether Vedanta, MMA with Mekron
1:03–1:10Anissa with Mekron, or Buddhism, was compelled to reassess its doctrines.Superscript 3.
1:10–1:14Ancient Nyaya was based upon the Nyaya Sutra of the Sage Godama and the examination of
1:14–1:17its 16 categories.
1:17–1:21Gangesa Upadyaya placed the theory of the means of knowledge at the center and developed
1:21–1:26a new analytical method founded on the four sources of cognition, perception, inference,
1:26–1:29comparison, and verbal testimony.
1:29–1:34This chapter considers, at distinct levels, the structure of the work, the technical language
1:34–1:39of Naviyanya, the tradition of its study from Mithila to Navadvipa, and the established
1:39–1:46facts, traditional narratives, and modern interpretations concerning Gangesa's life.
1:46–1:50Historical context, biography, and the nature of the sources.
1:50–1:56Period, birthplace, and family background.
1:56–2:01The period of Gangesa Upadyada, also called Gangesa or Gangesapadyaya, is generally placed
2:01–2:07in the closing phase of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th, approximately 1300-1350
2:07–2:08CE.
2:08–2:13SuperScript III distinguished historians such as Dinesh Chandrabahtacharya, as well as
2:13–2:18the Pateran Cyclopedia, place his active period around 1320 CE.SuperScript I he was
2:18–2:23born in a poor Mephile Brahman family of the Kasaiapagatra in a village of Mithila
2:23–2:25called Chattan or Chattan.
2:25–2:30His education, austerities, and direction of a school, however, took place in the village
2:30–2:35of Karyen on the bank of the Kamla River, about 19 kilometers or 12 miles southeast
2:35–2:37of Darbunga.
2:37–2:42From ancient times, Karyen had been a stronghold of Nyaya philosophy and had earlier been
2:42–2:46the residence of the great philosopher Yudha in Akarya.
2:46–2:51Politically, this period fell within the reign of the Karnataka King Harisi Hadiva,
2:51–2:551295-1326 CE.
2:55–2:59His reign is famous for introducing in Mithila the system of Pange administration for preserving
2:59–3:05genealogies, beginning in 1310 CE.Sanskrit literature and philosophy received unprecedented
3:05–3:10encouragement under the patronage of this dynasty.Accounts of Gangesa's family mention
3:10–3:13his wife, three sons, and one daughter.
3:13–3:18One of his sons, Vardhamana Upadyaya, later became a celebrated Nayaaka in his own right
3:18–3:24and wrote a commentary upon his father's workpoint superscript 3.
3:24–3:30sources and modern debate concerning his social biography.
3:30–3:36Accounts of Ganges's social background appear in the Pangee tradition, modern parallel historiography,
3:36–3:38and regional research.
3:38–3:43These sources present circumstances regarding his birth, lineage, and social acceptance that
3:43–3:46differ from the conventional biography.
3:46–3:50It is stated as undisputed that he was born five years after his father's death
3:50–3:55and that he married a woman of the leatherworking community, the Dapangyi reproduced in Gajendra
3:55–4:01Thakur's book is said to establish this from the original Pangee source. It is also considered
4:01–4:07possible that his maternal village lay in a leatherworker's quarter. The claims that the form,
4:07–4:12date, and textual variants of the available sources or everywhere uniform are presented as
4:12–4:17indisputable historical facts, supported by source-specific evidence and interpretation.
4:17–4:24The Panjhi-based interpretation confirms Gangesa's family connections and an intercast marriage,
4:24–4:28raising the possibility of his social exclusion.
4:28–4:33To reach a decisive conclusion on the matter, the original Panjhi manuscript, its date,
4:33–4:38genealogy, and independent historical evidence have been comparatively examined.
4:38–4:43This debate raises important questions for understanding the relationship among knowledge,
4:43–4:48structure and social prestige in medieval mediala.
4:48–4:52Some critics of modern historiography believe that alternative accounts of Gangesa's social
4:52–4:57life have not received adequate space in mainstream biographies.
4:57–5:02There are allegations that Ramanath Ja and Uday Chandra Ja ushok deliberately concealed
5:02–5:03facts.
5:03–5:08The source states that an impartial examination of the different sources, methods of selection,
5:08–5:11and causes of silence establishes this.
5:11–5:16Gangesa's philosophical importance is beyond dispute, while research into the social dimension
5:16–5:21of his life is said to establish these matters.
5:21–5:24LEGEND AND INTELLICTUAL ATTainment
5:24–5:29According to popular tradition and customary narratives, Gangesa was extremely slow-witted,
5:29–5:32inert, and illiterate as a child.
5:32–5:36His father made many attempts to educate him, but when these produced no result he
5:36–5:41was sent to his maternal relatives.There too, his maternal uncle and the uncles' pupils
5:41–5:46tried to teach him. When they failed, they assigned him menial tasks such as filling the
5:46–5:51pipe and bringing the hookah point superscript 1 superscript 3 1 story relates that, through
5:51–5:55the grace of a tantric practitioner engaged in corpse ritual at a cremation ground or
5:55–5:59through a boon from the goddess Kali, an extraordinary illumination of knowledge
5:59–6:04suddenly arose in him. When he returned home, his uncle debated scripture with
6:04–6:09him and was left speechless by Gangesa's arguments.
6:09–6:13This popular narrative is dominated by the miraculous.
6:13–6:18Historically, Gangesa acquired knowledge of the profound principles of ancient philosophy
6:18–6:22through rigorous labor and exceptional genius.
6:22–6:26He was honored with lofty titles such as Muhammad Huppadaya and Juggadguru, distinctions
6:26–6:31bestowed upon only a select number of Nyaya scholars in Mithila.
6:31–6:37The development from ancient Nyaya to Navya Nyaya and its intellectual background.
6:37–6:42Among the six principal orthodox systems of Indian philosophy, Naya, Vaika, Skaya, Yoga,
6:42–6:47MMA with Macron, SA with Macron, and Vedanta, Naya is renowned for its logical method.The
6:47–6:51systematic beginning of Naya is traced to the Nyayasutra composed by the sage Gautama
6:51–6:52or a captor.
6:52–6:57Approximately in the 2nd century BCE.Ancient Naya was principally based upon an examination
6:57–7:02of 16 categories, means of knowledge, objects of knowledge, doubt, purpose, example, established
7:02–7:05doctrine, members of an argument.
7:05–7:10Hypothetical reasoning, ascertainment, debate, disputation, destructive criticism, fallacious
7:10–7:15reasons, quibbling, futile rejoinders, and points of defeat.To the power of one its fundamental
7:15–7:18aim was to destroy ignorance through true knowledge and ultimately to attain release
7:18–7:22from suffering, apavaga or liberation, by escaping the cycle of birth and death
7:22–7:30In due course, teachers such as Vatsayana, Adiotakara, Jantaba, and Vakaspati Mishra cultivated
7:30–7:36this tradition further.Superscript I in the 10th and 11th centuries, Udayana Karya,
7:36–7:40another great Nayaaka of Mithila, brought ancient Nyaya into a harmonious synthesis
7:40–7:45with Vayika philosophy, which was chiefly concerned with ontology and atomism.By adding
7:45–7:50non-existence as the seventh category to the six categories of Vayika, Udayana
7:50–7:54Karyat established to combine Nyaya-Baika ontology.
7:54–7:59By the medieval period, however, Naya philosophy faced a serious intellectual or epistemic
7:59–8:01crisis.
8:01–8:05On the one hand, Buddhist logicians, especially Digniger, Dharmakirti, and their followers,
8:05–8:09launched powerful attacks upon Naya definitions of perception and inference.to the power
8:09–8:14of one on the other hand, Rara, the great 12th century teacher of Advaita Vidanta, criticized
8:14–8:19Naya doctrine so sharply in his karnakakya that the foundations of Naya were shaken.squared
8:19–8:24Rara argued that every definition used in philosophical inquiry is unstable. Refuting
8:24–8:28Udaya Nakarya's definition of knowledge, cognition is an experience of reality, he sought
8:28–8:33to prove that no flawless definition of any worldly object or cognition is possible apart
8:33–8:38from non-duality, Brahmin, everything is indefinable.to the power of one.
8:38–8:43To answer this epistemic crisis and defend Nyaya philosophy, Gangesa Upadyaya devised
8:43–8:48a revolutionary analytical method point superscript to he abandoned the ancient Nyaya arrangement
8:48–8:53of 16 categories and concentrated entirely upon the four means of knowledge, perception,
8:53–8:59inference, comparison, and verbal testimony point superscript 1 his new system, marked
8:59–9:04by terminological clarity, logical precision, and a mathematically structured language,
9:04–9:09came to be called Naviñaya point superscript 1 Gangesa's innovation lay less in the
9:09–9:11originality.
9:11–9:15Of doctrine then in the novelty of method and style.
9:15–9:19Its linguistic structure was fashioned with such rigor that no room remained for confusion,
9:19–9:23overextension, under extension, or impossibility.
9:23–9:241.
9:24–9:31Tathasintmai, the foundation of Navya-nyaya and an epistemological revolution.
9:31–9:36The supreme achievement of Gangesa Upadyaya's life is his Tathasintmai, the jewel of reflection
9:36–9:42on truth and epistemology, composed during his lifetime around 1325 C. The work became
9:42–9:45so celebrated and authoritative that it completely displaced the
9:45–9:48commentarial tradition centered on the ancient Nyayasutra.
9:49–9:54Almost the whole of later Navya-nyaya literature, described here as approximately half of that
9:54–9:59literature, was written directly on this work or in the form of commentaries and sub-commentaries
9:59–10:05upon it. SuperScript 1. The Tatmasintma is divided into four sections corresponding to
10:05–10:10the four Nyaya means of knowledge. 1. The book on perception. 2. The book on inference.
10:10–10:173. The book on comparison or analogy, and 4. The book on verbal testimony points superscript 1.
10:18–10:23Epistemological framework, valid and invalid cognition, a reliable theory of knowledge.
10:25–10:30Gangesa's epistemology is very close to the reliable list and externalist theories of Western
10:30–10:36philosophy, described in the Stanford Encyclopedia as super-reliabilism or infallibilism
10:36–10:42for externalists, superscript 3 Gangesa treats veritical cognition, Prama, within an objective
10:42–10:48causal framework. Whereas Western philosophy commonly evaluates belief, Indian philosophy
10:48–10:54evaluates cognition, which is treated as propositional point superscript 3.
10:54–10:58In the production of cognition, a means of knowledge is the principal instrumental
10:58–11:02cause point superscript 3 each means of knowledge has a distinctive trigger, the
11:02–11:09final and principal cause that activates the process. Trigger a perception, proximity or
11:09–11:13contact between a sense faculty and its object. Trigger of inference,
11:13–11:20substantive reflection upon a reason qualified by invariable concomitance. Trigger of verbal
11:20–11:25testimony, a statement made by a trustworthy person, an honest expert who knows the truth
11:25–11:29and states it without deception, and understood by the hearer point superscript 3.
11:29–11:34Gangesa explains that both the truth of a cognition and the correctness of the process
11:34–11:39that produces it are indispensable.cubed if a cognition is false or produced by a defective
11:39–11:45process, it is not for radical cognition but invalid cognition, a prama. Invalid cognition arises
11:45–11:49from pseudo sources. Although Naya accepts realism and acknowledges the possibility of
11:49–11:53error because of the limitations of human senses and material objects, when a cognition
11:53–11:58is correctly produced it is prama.cubed to explain this, Gangesa employs the subtle
11:58–12:03ontological structure of qualifier and qualificon.cubed.
12:03–12:10The doctrine of the validity of cognition, Mme with Mekran as a with Mekran and Nyaia.
12:10–12:15One of Gangesa's major intellectual disputes with Mme with Mekran as a with Mekran concerns
12:15–12:19the doctrine of the certification or validity of cognition.
12:19–12:23The Msaaka's uphold intrinsic validity, meaning that a cognition certifies its
12:23–12:26own truth the very moment it arises.
12:26–12:27.
12:27–12:283.
12:28–12:33In a forceful refutation, D'Angisa establishes extrinsic validity.
12:33–12:34.
12:34–12:353.
12:35–12:39He argues that if cognition validated itself, doubt could never arise in the mind.
12:39–12:44Since we experience error and doubt, whether a cognition is true or false must be determined
12:44–12:47by a subsequent and distinct mental process.
12:47–12:51This process is the capacity for successful activity.
12:51–13:03superscript 3 if an action inspired by a cognition succeeds, for example, one sees water, attempts to drink it, and quenches once thirst, the cognition is valid and possesses merit, otherwise it is defective invalid cognition.
13:04–13:15Gangesa here employs Udayanakarya's pragmatic contradiction, where doubt exists, practical conduct cannot proceed, and where regular conduct occurs, doubt cannot persist. superscript 3
13:15–13:23The perception section, the primary source of cognition and sense-object relation.
13:23–13:27The first section of the Tat Vasant My Concerns Perception.
13:27–13:31Gangesa treats perception as a fundamental cause in the production of cognition.
13:31–13:36The word pratyaka literally refers to what is before the eyes or senses.
13:36–13:40For Gangesa, perception is not merely sense-produced cognition but is factive.
13:40–13:45If a cognition proves false, as when a shell is mistaken for silver, it is not called
13:45–13:48perception under his definition but error, explained through the theory of apprehending
13:48–13:50one thing as another dot cube.
13:50–13:54Such error arises from a prior disposition lodged in memory when sense object contact
13:54–13:57is defective dot cubed.
13:57–13:59Ordinary sense object relation.
13:59–14:03Gangesa provides an exceptionally subtle analysis of six kinds of ordinary sense
14:03–14:07object relation required for perceptual cognition.
14:07–14:11These relations are founded upon viagra ontology, substance, quality, action,
14:11–14:15particularity, inherence, and absence.cubed.
14:15–14:18Extraordinary Perception
14:18–14:37Western empiricism accepts only cognition apprehended by the senses, but Gangesa gives a detailed account of three forms of extraordinary perception, making Naira complete epistemology.to the power of one first, perception through a universal characteristic, sannyalika upon perceiving one object, the entire class or universal of that object becomes known.
14:37–14:42For example, seeing one particular instance of smoke produces an awareness of smokehood
14:42–14:44in general.
14:44–14:47Without this, knowledge of pervasion or induction would be impossible.
14:47–14:51The power of one second, perception through a cognition as characteristic, jnalaka this
14:51–14:54is a memory-based cross-modal perception.
14:54–14:58For example, upon seeing sandalwood from a distance, one directly apprehends that
14:58–15:01it is fragrant without smelling it, the fragrance is perceived through the conjunction
15:01–15:02of vision and memory.
15:02–15:07The power of one third, yogically generated perception, yogaj at the immediate perception
15:07–15:12that yogins have a past, future, hidden, and distant objects through the power of austerity,
15:12–15:15yoga, and meditation.to the power of one.
15:15–15:19Indeterminate and Determinate Perception
15:19–15:23Another profound aspect of Navyanaya is the distinction between indeterminate, concept-free
15:23–15:27perception and determinate, concept-laden perception.cube.
15:27–15:31The distinction began with Vikaspati Mishra, but Gangesa brought it to completion.cube
15:31–15:32according to Gangesa.
15:32–15:37a complete cognition of an object, such as, this is a cow, is determinant perception, in
15:37–15:43which the relation between the qualificant, the cow, and the qualifier, cowhood, is manifest.
15:43–15:49Gangesa, however, presents a thought experiment. When a child sees a cow for the first time,
15:49–15:54no prior disposition of cowhood is present in the mind. In this first perceptual experience,
15:54–15:58the child sees only an object and its property separately but cannot yet connect them.
15:58–16:02This pure initial awareness, devoid of name and class and lacking the relation of
16:02–16:06qualificant and qualifier, is indeterminate perception.cubed it is indispensable to
16:06–16:10niharilism, for it shows that the human mind does not create concepts out of
16:10–16:14nothing but derives them from physical reality. Determinate perception could
16:14–16:18not arise without indeterminate perception.cubed.
16:18–16:21Apreception and Yovia Vaseya
16:21–16:26Gangesa examines a special kind of mental perception called apreception.
16:26–16:34It is an after cognition, a cognition of cognition.cubed internal perception, of pleasure, pain, thought, and the self, occurs through the mind.
16:34–16:40When we see something, that is the primary cognition, the self-awareness, I am seeing this, is a perception.
16:40–16:49Gangesa holds that error is possible in external perception, but there can be no error in experiencing the form in which the object appears within the scoped content of a perception.
16:50–16:52A perception can also take an illusion within its scope.
16:52–16:57For example, if a person suffering from jaundice sees a white wall as yellow, a perception
16:57–17:02enables the person to know, the wall appears yellow to me, although this is an illusion.
17:02–17:08A perception thus directs the examination of a cognition's validity.cubed.
17:08–17:14The inference section, the culmination of logical structure and the debate over perversion.
17:14–17:19The inference section of the tatva-sintma is the most celebrated, extensive, and complex
17:19–17:22part of the work and forms its center.
17:22–17:27subtlety and logical acuity place Navya Nyaya among the world's finest systems of logic.
17:28–17:33According to Gangesa, inference is the process by which the unknown is known on the basis of a
17:33–17:37known relation, both for oneself and for others point superscript one.
17:38–17:43Inference has three principal constituents, one, the subject, Parker, the locus of inferential
17:43–17:47cognition in which something is to be established and about which knowledge is desired,
17:47–17:53such as a mountain, too. The probandam, sad her, the property or object to be established,
17:53–17:58such as fire, and three. The reason or prover, he too or sodden on the basis of which the
17:58–18:05probandam is established, such as smoke, doc, cubed, provision, viaptee or natural entailment.
18:07–18:11The life and logical foundation of every inference is provision, the eternal,
18:11–18:14unchanging and natural relation between reason and probandam,
18:14–18:16Wherever there is smoke, there is fire.
18:16–18:21SuperScript 3. The debate over perversion was a principle cause of the rise of Navinyaya.
18:22–18:27Before Gangesa, Buddhist logicians and ancient Nayakas had offered 24 different definitions
18:27–18:33of perversion, including the five definitions of perversion, but they were circular, obscure,
18:33–18:35or incapable of excluding in Upade point.
18:35–18:39SuperScript 3. Gangesa rejected all 24 and established his own final,
18:39–18:41conclusive definition point.
18:41–18:42SuperScript 3.
18:42–18:463. According to his conclusive definition,
18:46–18:51Provision consists in the reason's non-occurrence wherever the probandom is absent, Provision
18:51–18:55is the non-occurrence of the reason and the locus of the absence of the probandom, superscript
18:55–19:001 the Stanford Encyclopedia is cited as explaining this further, where the probandom
19:00–19:05is wholly absent, the reason must also be absent. If the probandom is a universal
19:05–19:11property, its absence cannot coexist with the reason, superscript 3.
19:11–19:16Gangesa's definition is highly refined and successfully resolves difficult problems
19:16–19:21involving properties that do not pervade their entire locus point superscript 3-1 example
19:21–19:24is the conjunction of a monkey with a tree.
19:24–19:28The monkey is on a branch but not at the root, consequently, the tree contains both
19:28–19:33conjunction with the monkey and an absence of that conjunction.
19:33–19:36Older definitions would invalidate such an inference, but Gangesa's conclusive
19:36–19:41definition treats it as valid because conjunction with the monkey is not wholly absent from the entire
19:41–19:48treat point superscript 3. Knowledge of pervasion arises through an inductive process.
19:49–19:53Gangesa takes repeated and extensive observation as its basis, comprising
19:55–19:59positive concomitance, or the similar instance where the probandom is present,
19:59–20:03the reason is also present, as in a kitchen, which serves as the example.
20:03–20:09negative concomitance, or the dissimilar instance, where the probandum is absent,
20:09–20:14the reason is also absent, as in a pawn point superscript 3 this produces a disposition in
20:14–20:19the mind that recalls perversion at the time of subsumptive reflection point superscript 3
20:19–20:24Gangesa also employs hypothetical reasoning, which is not itself a direct means of knowledge
20:24–20:28but strengthens perversion by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary through
20:28–20:34reductio ad absurdum point superscript 3. The extraneous condition, Upity.
20:36–20:40And Upity is an additional condition or concealed circumstance that defeats
20:40–20:45perversion invitiates an inference, functioning as an epistemic defeater point superscript 3.
20:45–20:50Its technical definition is that it pervades the probandum wherever the probandum occurs,
20:50–20:53the Upity necessarily occurs, but does not pervade the reason.
20:53–20:58Ganjisa devotes the 10th division of the inference section to its examination point
20:58–21:03superscript 3 the point may be illustrated as follows, Al becomes angry, therefore he will
21:03–21:10engage in violence. Here Bell's presence is an additional condition. Al becomes violent only
21:10–21:17when Bell is present, if Bell is absent, Al will not do so. Identification of the Upadee thus
21:17–21:21prevents a false provision and removes the logical error point superscript 3.
21:21–21:223.
21:22–21:28Phalacious reasons and logical defects, het vabhasa
21:28–21:33Gangesa gives an exceptionally systematic classification of phalacious reasons, what appears to be a reason
21:33–21:35but is not.
21:35–21:39They are of five kinds point superscript 3.
21:39–21:45In addition, Gangesa discusses feudal rejoinders based on false analogies and points of defeat
21:45–21:49and debate, although he regards these as forms of stratagem and intellectual controversy
21:49–21:55Point Superscript 3. Philosophical inferences, establishing God and the
21:55–22:02Self. In the inference section, Gangesa conducts three major philosophical inquiries regarded as
22:02–22:08milestones in Indian philosophy.Poinsuperscript 3 first, the inference of God, refuting the atheism
22:08–22:12of themsaka and Buddhist systems, Gangesa establishes the existence of God through
22:12–22:17inference.Poinsuperscript 3 his argument is that earth, sprouts, and similar things are
22:17–22:22products and must therefore have a conscious maker, just as a pot, being a product, has
22:22–22:25a potter as its maker.
22:25–22:29Buddhists offered growing grass as a counter-example, arguing that grass is a product without
22:29–22:31a maker.
22:31–22:36Gangesa replies that growing grass is itself the inferential subject, and to offer the
22:36–22:39subject as the example is to beg the question.
22:39–22:40The Buddhists
22:40–22:46The comparison and verbal testimony sections, linguistic knowledge and the determination
22:46–22:49of meaning.
22:49–22:53comparison as a means of knowledge.
22:53–22:56The third section of the tat vassant my concerns comparison.
22:56–23:01Although brief, Gangesa regards comparison as an independent means of knowledge.
23:01–23:05Through it, the designation or name of a new object becomes known on the basis of similarity
23:05–23:10.to the power of one for example, a person is told, Govaya, or Wild Ox, resembles a
23:10–23:12cow.
23:12–23:15When the person later sees a cow like animal in the forest, similarity enables the
23:15–23:19cognition, this is a gavaya.
23:19–23:23Verbal testimony as a means of knowledge.
23:23–23:27The fourth section concerns verbal testimony.
23:27–23:32Gangesa regards testimony as an independent, irreducible, and factive source of cognition
23:32–23:36point superscript 1 according to the maxim, the instruction of a trustworthy person is
23:36–23:41verbal testimony, a statement made by a reliable speaker, one who speaks truthfully
23:41–23:42and has no
23:42–23:48In the refutation of vayaka and Buddhist views, vayaka included verbal testimony under inference.
23:48–23:52Its argument was that verbal cognition is inferential, speaker A uttered statement B,
23:52–23:57speaker A is trustworthy, trustworthy person statement is true, therefore B is true.
23:57–24:01Gangesa forcefully objects, how can this inference even begin?
24:01–24:05To know the first premise, speaker A uttered statement B, verbal testimony must already
24:05–24:09be accepted as an independent means of knowledge.
24:09–24:13testimony, even the inference's preliminary premise cannot be understood.Cubed Buddhist
24:13–24:18Yogicara's, on the other hand, regarded language as merely a pragmatic instrument with no relation
24:18–24:22to reality, useful only for fulfilling desires or avoiding harm.
24:22–24:26Gangesa rejects this and establishes that veridical testimony produces objective cognition,
24:26–24:31whereas defective or misleading utterances fail to produce knowledge.
24:31–24:35Language is a vehicle of reality.Cubed.
24:35–24:39of meaning and the hearer's point of view, semantics.
24:39–24:40To
24:40–24:46Mithila's intellectual heritage and the historical expansion of Navya Nyaaya
24:46–24:50The lamp of Navya Nyaaya knowledge kindled by Gangesa Upadyaya illuminated Mithila's
24:50–24:54intellectual tradition for centuries and reshaped intellectual debate across the
24:54–24:57Indian subcontinent.
24:57–25:01After him, a long, continuous, and rich tradition of Nyaaya learning flourished
25:01–25:04in Mithila.
25:04–25:09His able son Vardhimana Ulpadyaya extended his father's tradition by composing the Tathasint
25:09–25:14Miprakasa upon the Tathasint Mipoint superscript 3.
25:14–25:20In the 15th century, around 1452 CE, Patkadhara Mishra, also known as Jaya Diva Mishra, became
25:20–25:25another great pillar of Navya Nyaya and composed the enduring commentary Tathasint
25:25–25:31Myeloka. His learning was acknowledged throughout India.
25:31–25:37Nayaakas such as Vasudeva Mishra, Rusadatta Mishra, Bajaratha Kura, Mahisa Kura, the founder
25:37–25:42of the Darbhanga Raj and Akara Mishra established the splendor of Mithila's learning throughout India,
25:42–25:46while this tradition of knowledge flourished under the patronage of the rulers of the
25:46–25:52Oynuvar dynasty. The movement from Mithila to Bengal, Navadvipa.
25:53–25:58A crucial historical turning point in Navayanya came when the gifted Bengali scholar Vasudeva
25:58–26:04Sarvabhama in the 16th century, came to Mithila and studied Gnyaya philosophy under Paket Haramishra.
26:05–26:11A strict traditional rule in Mithila prohibited outside students from carrying manuscripts away,
26:11–26:15thereby preserving Mithila's intellectual monopoly point superscript one superscript one
26:15–26:20Vasudeva Sarvabhama, however, used his extraordinary memory to commit the entire
26:20–26:26Tathasintmai in Udayana Karyas Kusumungali to memory. He then traveled through Kasi
26:26–26:31to Navadvipa in Bengal and established a new branch of Navya Naya their point superscript
26:31–26:362. In Time, His Pupils Regunatha Iromai,
26:36–26:41author of the Dittitai commentary, Mathuranatha Tarkabajasa, Jagadisa Tarklokra, and Gaddhothar
26:41–26:46Bakriya carried Navya Naya to the summit of logical sophistication point superscript
26:46–26:502. Gaddhothar Bakriya's theory of objectness and theory of semantic power endowed the
26:50–26:55language of Navya Nyaya with unimaginable subtlety and philosophical depth point superscript
26:55–26:57too.
26:57–27:02The artificial and exact technical vocabulary of Navya Nyaya prove so powerful and precise
27:02–27:08that later scholars in fields such as Grammar, Ayurveda, Dharmasastra, Literature, Tuntra,
27:08–27:13and Advaita Vedanta began composing their works in its language.In the modern period,
27:13–27:17philosophers such as Professor John Batnki and Sibhajeevan Bhattacharya have established
27:17–27:24the global importance of this logical language of Navya-Nyaya point superscript 2.
27:24–27:27Conclusion
27:27–27:32Gangesa Upadyaya and his timeless Tathasintmai constituted golden and unique chapter in Indian
27:32–27:37philosophical thought, presenting one of its finest examples of objectivity, logical rigor,
27:37–27:40and structural analysis of cognition.
27:40–27:44He not only assimilated the traditions of ancient Nyaya and Vayika but gave them
27:44–27:49new life and direction, making epistemology, rather than ontology, the central concern of
27:49–27:52Indian philosophy.
27:52–27:57His logical method, Navyañaya, is a marvel of the human mind's analytical capacity,
27:57–28:02its terminological clarity is comparable to, and at times presented as more profound than,
28:02–28:05modern analytic philosophy.
28:05–28:10His precise definition of perversion, discussion of the Upati, subtle treatment of apperception,
28:10–28:15logical proof of God testify to his unequaled intellect.
28:15–28:20Pange based in modern interpretations of Gangesa's life raise a broad social question, what was
28:20–28:25the relationship between intellectual genius and status based on birth?
28:25–28:29There is no complete agreement concerning these views.
28:29–28:34Nevertheless, his philosophical achievement makes clear that the value of reasoning,
28:34–28:39study, and knowledge is not determined by caste or social boundaries.
28:39–28:43The logical discipline of Navyañaya creates an intellectual domain in which the value of
28:43–28:49a proposition is determined not by birth or prestige but by evidence and reasoning.
28:49–28:53Developed in Mithila, this method reached Navadvipa and other centers of learning in
28:53–28:58India and became the basis of a long-standing commentarial tradition.
28:58–29:03In this sense, the Tatva-Sintmai is an important representative work of the analytical genius
29:03–29:05of Nithila and of India as a whole.

Plain text

गंजिसा उपड्याया अनावियन्याय, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टम Yaya, who initiated Navya-Nyaya, the new logic, in the 14th century and completely transformed the direction, condition, and analytical method of Indian philosophy point superscript one is timeless and immortal work, the Tattvasintmai, the jewel of thought on the nature of things, proved to be a milestone not only for Nyaya philosophy but for the whole of Indian epistemology. In its light, every later philosophical school, whether Vedanta, MMA with Mekron Anissa with Mekron, or Buddhism, was compelled to reassess its doctrines.Superscript 3. Ancient Nyaya was based upon the Nyaya Sutra of the Sage Godama and the examination of its 16 categories. Gangesa Upadyaya placed the theory of the means of knowledge at the center and developed a new analytical method founded on the four sources of cognition, perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony. This chapter considers, at distinct levels, the structure of the work, the technical language of Naviyanya, the tradition of its study from Mithila to Navadvipa, and the established facts, traditional narratives, and modern interpretations concerning Gangesa's life. Historical context, biography, and the nature of the sources. Period, birthplace, and family background. The period of Gangesa Upadyada, also called Gangesa or Gangesapadyaya, is generally placed in the closing phase of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th, approximately 1300-1350 CE. SuperScript III distinguished historians such as Dinesh Chandrabahtacharya, as well as the Pateran Cyclopedia, place his active period around 1320 CE.SuperScript I he was born in a poor Mephile Brahman family of the Kasaiapagatra in a village of Mithila called Chattan or Chattan. His education, austerities, and direction of a school, however, took place in the village of Karyen on the bank of the Kamla River, about 19 kilometers or 12 miles southeast of Darbunga. From ancient times, Karyen had been a stronghold of Nyaya philosophy and had earlier been the residence of the great philosopher Yudha in Akarya. Politically, this period fell within the reign of the Karnataka King Harisi Hadiva, 1295-1326 CE. His reign is famous for introducing in Mithila the system of Pange administration for preserving genealogies, beginning in 1310 CE.Sanskrit literature and philosophy received unprecedented encouragement under the patronage of this dynasty.Accounts of Gangesa's family mention his wife, three sons, and one daughter. One of his sons, Vardhamana Upadyaya, later became a celebrated Nayaaka in his own right and wrote a commentary upon his father's workpoint superscript 3. sources and modern debate concerning his social biography. Accounts of Ganges's social background appear in the Pangee tradition, modern parallel historiography, and regional research. These sources present circumstances regarding his birth, lineage, and social acceptance that differ from the conventional biography. It is stated as undisputed that he was born five years after his father's death and that he married a woman of the leatherworking community, the Dapangyi reproduced in Gajendra Thakur's book is said to establish this from the original Pangee source. It is also considered possible that his maternal village lay in a leatherworker's quarter. The claims that the form, date, and textual variants of the available sources or everywhere uniform are presented as indisputable historical facts, supported by source-specific evidence and interpretation. The Panjhi-based interpretation confirms Gangesa's family connections and an intercast marriage, raising the possibility of his social exclusion. To reach a decisive conclusion on the matter, the original Panjhi manuscript, its date, genealogy, and independent historical evidence have been comparatively examined. This debate raises important questions for understanding the relationship among knowledge, structure and social prestige in medieval mediala. Some critics of modern historiography believe that alternative accounts of Gangesa's social life have not received adequate space in mainstream biographies. There are allegations that Ramanath Ja and Uday Chandra Ja ushok deliberately concealed facts. The source states that an impartial examination of the different sources, methods of selection, and causes of silence establishes this. Gangesa's philosophical importance is beyond dispute, while research into the social dimension of his life is said to establish these matters. LEGEND AND INTELLICTUAL ATTainment According to popular tradition and customary narratives, Gangesa was extremely slow-witted, inert, and illiterate as a child. His father made many attempts to educate him, but when these produced no result he was sent to his maternal relatives.There too, his maternal uncle and the uncles' pupils tried to teach him. When they failed, they assigned him menial tasks such as filling the pipe and bringing the hookah point superscript 1 superscript 3 1 story relates that, through the grace of a tantric practitioner engaged in corpse ritual at a cremation ground or through a boon from the goddess Kali, an extraordinary illumination of knowledge suddenly arose in him. When he returned home, his uncle debated scripture with him and was left speechless by Gangesa's arguments. This popular narrative is dominated by the miraculous. Historically, Gangesa acquired knowledge of the profound principles of ancient philosophy through rigorous labor and exceptional genius. He was honored with lofty titles such as Muhammad Huppadaya and Juggadguru, distinctions bestowed upon only a select number of Nyaya scholars in Mithila. The development from ancient Nyaya to Navya Nyaya and its intellectual background. Among the six principal orthodox systems of Indian philosophy, Naya, Vaika, Skaya, Yoga, MMA with Macron, SA with Macron, and Vedanta, Naya is renowned for its logical method.The systematic beginning of Naya is traced to the Nyayasutra composed by the sage Gautama or a captor. Approximately in the 2nd century BCE.Ancient Naya was principally based upon an examination of 16 categories, means of knowledge, objects of knowledge, doubt, purpose, example, established doctrine, members of an argument. Hypothetical reasoning, ascertainment, debate, disputation, destructive criticism, fallacious reasons, quibbling, futile rejoinders, and points of defeat.To the power of one its fundamental aim was to destroy ignorance through true knowledge and ultimately to attain release from suffering, apavaga or liberation, by escaping the cycle of birth and death In due course, teachers such as Vatsayana, Adiotakara, Jantaba, and Vakaspati Mishra cultivated this tradition further.Superscript I in the 10th and 11th centuries, Udayana Karya, another great Nayaaka of Mithila, brought ancient Nyaya into a harmonious synthesis with Vayika philosophy, which was chiefly concerned with ontology and atomism.By adding non-existence as the seventh category to the six categories of Vayika, Udayana Karyat established to combine Nyaya-Baika ontology. By the medieval period, however, Naya philosophy faced a serious intellectual or epistemic crisis. On the one hand, Buddhist logicians, especially Digniger, Dharmakirti, and their followers, launched powerful attacks upon Naya definitions of perception and inference.to the power of one on the other hand, Rara, the great 12th century teacher of Advaita Vidanta, criticized Naya doctrine so sharply in his karnakakya that the foundations of Naya were shaken.squared Rara argued that every definition used in philosophical inquiry is unstable. Refuting Udaya Nakarya's definition of knowledge, cognition is an experience of reality, he sought to prove that no flawless definition of any worldly object or cognition is possible apart from non-duality, Brahmin, everything is indefinable.to the power of one. To answer this epistemic crisis and defend Nyaya philosophy, Gangesa Upadyaya devised a revolutionary analytical method point superscript to he abandoned the ancient Nyaya arrangement of 16 categories and concentrated entirely upon the four means of knowledge, perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony point superscript 1 his new system, marked by terminological clarity, logical precision, and a mathematically structured language, came to be called Naviñaya point superscript 1 Gangesa's innovation lay less in the originality. Of doctrine then in the novelty of method and style. Its linguistic structure was fashioned with such rigor that no room remained for confusion, overextension, under extension, or impossibility. 1. Tathasintmai, the foundation of Navya-nyaya and an epistemological revolution. The supreme achievement of Gangesa Upadyaya's life is his Tathasintmai, the jewel of reflection on truth and epistemology, composed during his lifetime around 1325 C. The work became so celebrated and authoritative that it completely displaced the commentarial tradition centered on the ancient Nyayasutra. Almost the whole of later Navya-nyaya literature, described here as approximately half of that literature, was written directly on this work or in the form of commentaries and sub-commentaries upon it. SuperScript 1. The Tatmasintma is divided into four sections corresponding to the four Nyaya means of knowledge. 1. The book on perception. 2. The book on inference. 3. The book on comparison or analogy, and 4. The book on verbal testimony points superscript 1. Epistemological framework, valid and invalid cognition, a reliable theory of knowledge. Gangesa's epistemology is very close to the reliable list and externalist theories of Western philosophy, described in the Stanford Encyclopedia as super-reliabilism or infallibilism for externalists, superscript 3 Gangesa treats veritical cognition, Prama, within an objective causal framework. Whereas Western philosophy commonly evaluates belief, Indian philosophy evaluates cognition, which is treated as propositional point superscript 3. In the production of cognition, a means of knowledge is the principal instrumental cause point superscript 3 each means of knowledge has a distinctive trigger, the final and principal cause that activates the process. Trigger a perception, proximity or contact between a sense faculty and its object. Trigger of inference, substantive reflection upon a reason qualified by invariable concomitance. Trigger of verbal testimony, a statement made by a trustworthy person, an honest expert who knows the truth and states it without deception, and understood by the hearer point superscript 3. Gangesa explains that both the truth of a cognition and the correctness of the process that produces it are indispensable.cubed if a cognition is false or produced by a defective process, it is not for radical cognition but invalid cognition, a prama. Invalid cognition arises from pseudo sources. Although Naya accepts realism and acknowledges the possibility of error because of the limitations of human senses and material objects, when a cognition is correctly produced it is prama.cubed to explain this, Gangesa employs the subtle ontological structure of qualifier and qualificon.cubed. The doctrine of the validity of cognition, Mme with Mekran as a with Mekran and Nyaia. One of Gangesa's major intellectual disputes with Mme with Mekran as a with Mekran concerns the doctrine of the certification or validity of cognition. The Msaaka's uphold intrinsic validity, meaning that a cognition certifies its own truth the very moment it arises. . 3. In a forceful refutation, D'Angisa establishes extrinsic validity. . 3. He argues that if cognition validated itself, doubt could never arise in the mind. Since we experience error and doubt, whether a cognition is true or false must be determined by a subsequent and distinct mental process. This process is the capacity for successful activity. superscript 3 if an action inspired by a cognition succeeds, for example, one sees water, attempts to drink it, and quenches once thirst, the cognition is valid and possesses merit, otherwise it is defective invalid cognition. Gangesa here employs Udayanakarya's pragmatic contradiction, where doubt exists, practical conduct cannot proceed, and where regular conduct occurs, doubt cannot persist. superscript 3 The perception section, the primary source of cognition and sense-object relation. The first section of the Tat Vasant My Concerns Perception. Gangesa treats perception as a fundamental cause in the production of cognition. The word pratyaka literally refers to what is before the eyes or senses. For Gangesa, perception is not merely sense-produced cognition but is factive. If a cognition proves false, as when a shell is mistaken for silver, it is not called perception under his definition but error, explained through the theory of apprehending one thing as another dot cube. Such error arises from a prior disposition lodged in memory when sense object contact is defective dot cubed. Ordinary sense object relation. Gangesa provides an exceptionally subtle analysis of six kinds of ordinary sense object relation required for perceptual cognition. These relations are founded upon viagra ontology, substance, quality, action, particularity, inherence, and absence.cubed. Extraordinary Perception Western empiricism accepts only cognition apprehended by the senses, but Gangesa gives a detailed account of three forms of extraordinary perception, making Naira complete epistemology.to the power of one first, perception through a universal characteristic, sannyalika upon perceiving one object, the entire class or universal of that object becomes known. For example, seeing one particular instance of smoke produces an awareness of smokehood in general. Without this, knowledge of pervasion or induction would be impossible. The power of one second, perception through a cognition as characteristic, jnalaka this is a memory-based cross-modal perception. For example, upon seeing sandalwood from a distance, one directly apprehends that it is fragrant without smelling it, the fragrance is perceived through the conjunction of vision and memory. The power of one third, yogically generated perception, yogaj at the immediate perception that yogins have a past, future, hidden, and distant objects through the power of austerity, yoga, and meditation.to the power of one. Indeterminate and Determinate Perception Another profound aspect of Navyanaya is the distinction between indeterminate, concept-free perception and determinate, concept-laden perception.cube. The distinction began with Vikaspati Mishra, but Gangesa brought it to completion.cube according to Gangesa. a complete cognition of an object, such as, this is a cow, is determinant perception, in which the relation between the qualificant, the cow, and the qualifier, cowhood, is manifest. Gangesa, however, presents a thought experiment. When a child sees a cow for the first time, no prior disposition of cowhood is present in the mind. In this first perceptual experience, the child sees only an object and its property separately but cannot yet connect them. This pure initial awareness, devoid of name and class and lacking the relation of qualificant and qualifier, is indeterminate perception.cubed it is indispensable to niharilism, for it shows that the human mind does not create concepts out of nothing but derives them from physical reality. Determinate perception could not arise without indeterminate perception.cubed. Apreception and Yovia Vaseya Gangesa examines a special kind of mental perception called apreception. It is an after cognition, a cognition of cognition.cubed internal perception, of pleasure, pain, thought, and the self, occurs through the mind. When we see something, that is the primary cognition, the self-awareness, I am seeing this, is a perception. Gangesa holds that error is possible in external perception, but there can be no error in experiencing the form in which the object appears within the scoped content of a perception. A perception can also take an illusion within its scope. For example, if a person suffering from jaundice sees a white wall as yellow, a perception enables the person to know, the wall appears yellow to me, although this is an illusion. A perception thus directs the examination of a cognition's validity.cubed. The inference section, the culmination of logical structure and the debate over perversion. The inference section of the tatva-sintma is the most celebrated, extensive, and complex part of the work and forms its center. subtlety and logical acuity place Navya Nyaya among the world's finest systems of logic. According to Gangesa, inference is the process by which the unknown is known on the basis of a known relation, both for oneself and for others point superscript one. Inference has three principal constituents, one, the subject, Parker, the locus of inferential cognition in which something is to be established and about which knowledge is desired, such as a mountain, too. The probandam, sad her, the property or object to be established, such as fire, and three. The reason or prover, he too or sodden on the basis of which the probandam is established, such as smoke, doc, cubed, provision, viaptee or natural entailment. The life and logical foundation of every inference is provision, the eternal, unchanging and natural relation between reason and probandam, Wherever there is smoke, there is fire. SuperScript 3. The debate over perversion was a principle cause of the rise of Navinyaya. Before Gangesa, Buddhist logicians and ancient Nayakas had offered 24 different definitions of perversion, including the five definitions of perversion, but they were circular, obscure, or incapable of excluding in Upade point. SuperScript 3. Gangesa rejected all 24 and established his own final, conclusive definition point. SuperScript 3. 3. According to his conclusive definition, Provision consists in the reason's non-occurrence wherever the probandom is absent, Provision is the non-occurrence of the reason and the locus of the absence of the probandom, superscript 1 the Stanford Encyclopedia is cited as explaining this further, where the probandom is wholly absent, the reason must also be absent. If the probandom is a universal property, its absence cannot coexist with the reason, superscript 3. Gangesa's definition is highly refined and successfully resolves difficult problems involving properties that do not pervade their entire locus point superscript 3-1 example is the conjunction of a monkey with a tree. The monkey is on a branch but not at the root, consequently, the tree contains both conjunction with the monkey and an absence of that conjunction. Older definitions would invalidate such an inference, but Gangesa's conclusive definition treats it as valid because conjunction with the monkey is not wholly absent from the entire treat point superscript 3. Knowledge of pervasion arises through an inductive process. Gangesa takes repeated and extensive observation as its basis, comprising positive concomitance, or the similar instance where the probandom is present, the reason is also present, as in a kitchen, which serves as the example. negative concomitance, or the dissimilar instance, where the probandum is absent, the reason is also absent, as in a pawn point superscript 3 this produces a disposition in the mind that recalls perversion at the time of subsumptive reflection point superscript 3 Gangesa also employs hypothetical reasoning, which is not itself a direct means of knowledge but strengthens perversion by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary through reductio ad absurdum point superscript 3. The extraneous condition, Upity. And Upity is an additional condition or concealed circumstance that defeats perversion invitiates an inference, functioning as an epistemic defeater point superscript 3. Its technical definition is that it pervades the probandum wherever the probandum occurs, the Upity necessarily occurs, but does not pervade the reason. Ganjisa devotes the 10th division of the inference section to its examination point superscript 3 the point may be illustrated as follows, Al becomes angry, therefore he will engage in violence. Here Bell's presence is an additional condition. Al becomes violent only when Bell is present, if Bell is absent, Al will not do so. Identification of the Upadee thus prevents a false provision and removes the logical error point superscript 3. 3. Phalacious reasons and logical defects, het vabhasa Gangesa gives an exceptionally systematic classification of phalacious reasons, what appears to be a reason but is not. They are of five kinds point superscript 3. In addition, Gangesa discusses feudal rejoinders based on false analogies and points of defeat and debate, although he regards these as forms of stratagem and intellectual controversy Point Superscript 3. Philosophical inferences, establishing God and the Self. In the inference section, Gangesa conducts three major philosophical inquiries regarded as milestones in Indian philosophy.Poinsuperscript 3 first, the inference of God, refuting the atheism of themsaka and Buddhist systems, Gangesa establishes the existence of God through inference.Poinsuperscript 3 his argument is that earth, sprouts, and similar things are products and must therefore have a conscious maker, just as a pot, being a product, has a potter as its maker. Buddhists offered growing grass as a counter-example, arguing that grass is a product without a maker. Gangesa replies that growing grass is itself the inferential subject, and to offer the subject as the example is to beg the question. The Buddhists The comparison and verbal testimony sections, linguistic knowledge and the determination of meaning. comparison as a means of knowledge. The third section of the tat vassant my concerns comparison. Although brief, Gangesa regards comparison as an independent means of knowledge. Through it, the designation or name of a new object becomes known on the basis of similarity .to the power of one for example, a person is told, Govaya, or Wild Ox, resembles a cow. When the person later sees a cow like animal in the forest, similarity enables the cognition, this is a gavaya. Verbal testimony as a means of knowledge. The fourth section concerns verbal testimony. Gangesa regards testimony as an independent, irreducible, and factive source of cognition point superscript 1 according to the maxim, the instruction of a trustworthy person is verbal testimony, a statement made by a reliable speaker, one who speaks truthfully and has no In the refutation of vayaka and Buddhist views, vayaka included verbal testimony under inference. Its argument was that verbal cognition is inferential, speaker A uttered statement B, speaker A is trustworthy, trustworthy person statement is true, therefore B is true. Gangesa forcefully objects, how can this inference even begin? To know the first premise, speaker A uttered statement B, verbal testimony must already be accepted as an independent means of knowledge. testimony, even the inference's preliminary premise cannot be understood.Cubed Buddhist Yogicara's, on the other hand, regarded language as merely a pragmatic instrument with no relation to reality, useful only for fulfilling desires or avoiding harm. Gangesa rejects this and establishes that veridical testimony produces objective cognition, whereas defective or misleading utterances fail to produce knowledge. Language is a vehicle of reality.Cubed. of meaning and the hearer's point of view, semantics. To Mithila's intellectual heritage and the historical expansion of Navya Nyaaya The lamp of Navya Nyaaya knowledge kindled by Gangesa Upadyaya illuminated Mithila's intellectual tradition for centuries and reshaped intellectual debate across the Indian subcontinent. After him, a long, continuous, and rich tradition of Nyaaya learning flourished in Mithila. His able son Vardhimana Ulpadyaya extended his father's tradition by composing the Tathasint Miprakasa upon the Tathasint Mipoint superscript 3. In the 15th century, around 1452 CE, Patkadhara Mishra, also known as Jaya Diva Mishra, became another great pillar of Navya Nyaya and composed the enduring commentary Tathasint Myeloka. His learning was acknowledged throughout India. Nayaakas such as Vasudeva Mishra, Rusadatta Mishra, Bajaratha Kura, Mahisa Kura, the founder of the Darbhanga Raj and Akara Mishra established the splendor of Mithila's learning throughout India, while this tradition of knowledge flourished under the patronage of the rulers of the Oynuvar dynasty. The movement from Mithila to Bengal, Navadvipa. A crucial historical turning point in Navayanya came when the gifted Bengali scholar Vasudeva Sarvabhama in the 16th century, came to Mithila and studied Gnyaya philosophy under Paket Haramishra. A strict traditional rule in Mithila prohibited outside students from carrying manuscripts away, thereby preserving Mithila's intellectual monopoly point superscript one superscript one Vasudeva Sarvabhama, however, used his extraordinary memory to commit the entire Tathasintmai in Udayana Karyas Kusumungali to memory. He then traveled through Kasi to Navadvipa in Bengal and established a new branch of Navya Naya their point superscript 2. In Time, His Pupils Regunatha Iromai, author of the Dittitai commentary, Mathuranatha Tarkabajasa, Jagadisa Tarklokra, and Gaddhothar Bakriya carried Navya Naya to the summit of logical sophistication point superscript 2. Gaddhothar Bakriya's theory of objectness and theory of semantic power endowed the language of Navya Nyaya with unimaginable subtlety and philosophical depth point superscript too. The artificial and exact technical vocabulary of Navya Nyaya prove so powerful and precise that later scholars in fields such as Grammar, Ayurveda, Dharmasastra, Literature, Tuntra, and Advaita Vedanta began composing their works in its language.In the modern period, philosophers such as Professor John Batnki and Sibhajeevan Bhattacharya have established the global importance of this logical language of Navya-Nyaya point superscript 2. Conclusion Gangesa Upadyaya and his timeless Tathasintmai constituted golden and unique chapter in Indian philosophical thought, presenting one of its finest examples of objectivity, logical rigor, and structural analysis of cognition. He not only assimilated the traditions of ancient Nyaya and Vayika but gave them new life and direction, making epistemology, rather than ontology, the central concern of Indian philosophy. His logical method, Navyañaya, is a marvel of the human mind's analytical capacity, its terminological clarity is comparable to, and at times presented as more profound than, modern analytic philosophy. His precise definition of perversion, discussion of the Upati, subtle treatment of apperception, logical proof of God testify to his unequaled intellect. Pange based in modern interpretations of Gangesa's life raise a broad social question, what was the relationship between intellectual genius and status based on birth? There is no complete agreement concerning these views. Nevertheless, his philosophical achievement makes clear that the value of reasoning, study, and knowledge is not determined by caste or social boundaries. The logical discipline of Navyañaya creates an intellectual domain in which the value of a proposition is determined not by birth or prestige but by evidence and reasoning. Developed in Mithila, this method reached Navadvipa and other centers of learning in India and became the basis of a long-standing commentarial tradition. In this sense, the Tatva-Sintmai is an important representative work of the analytical genius of Nithila and of India as a whole.

← Transcript index