MACHINE ASR ACCESSIBILITY AID

Episode1_Part2_RadioPlay.mp3

Not an editorially verified transcript. This text was generated automatically from the preserved recording and may contain recognition, language-detection, spelling, segmentation or name errors. Consult the source recording for authoritative content.

Collection: Part 11 · VIDEHA MITHILA MAITHILI DISCUSSION CRITICISM SERIES PART 11
Status: asr-draft
Human verified: No
Editorial review: not-reviewed
ASR model: small
Detected language: en (0.985136)
Duration: 29:09
Source: Open preserved recording

Timestamped machine output

0:04–0:37गंजिसा उपद्याया अनावियन्याय, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टम
0:37–0:42Yaya, who initiated Navya-Nyaya, the new logic, in the 14th century and completely transformed
0:42–0:47the direction, condition, and analytical method of Indian philosophy point superscript one
0:47–0:52is timeless and immortal work, the Tattvasintmai, the jewel of thought on the nature of things,
0:52–0:58proved to be a milestone not only for Nyaya philosophy but for the whole of Indian epistemology.
0:58–1:03In its light, every later philosophical school, whether Vedanta, MMA with Mekron
1:03–1:10Anissa with Mekron, or Buddhism, was compelled to reassess its doctrines.Superscript 3.
1:10–1:14Ancient Nyaya was based upon the Nyaya Sutra of the Sage Godama and the examination of
1:14–1:17its 16 categories.
1:17–1:21Gangesa Upadyaya placed the theory of the means of knowledge at the center and developed
1:21–1:26a new analytical method founded on the four sources of cognition, perception, inference,
1:26–1:29comparison, and verbal testimony.
1:29–1:34This chapter considers, at distinct levels, the structure of the work, the technical language
1:34–1:39of Naviyanya, the tradition of its study from Mithila to Navadvipa, and the established
1:39–1:46facts, traditional narratives, and modern interpretations concerning Gangesa's life.
1:46–1:50Historical context, biography, and the nature of the sources.
1:50–1:56Period, birthplace, and family background.
1:56–2:01The period of Gangesa Upadyada, also called Gangesa or Gangesapadyaya, is generally placed
2:01–2:06in the closing phase of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th, approximately
2:06–2:081300-1350 CE.
2:08–2:12Superscript III distinguished historians such as Dinesh Chandrabat Tacharya, as well as
2:12–2:18the Pateran Cyclopedia, place his active period around 1320 CE.Superscript I he was
2:18–2:22born in a poor Mephile Brahman family of the Kasaiyapagatra in a village of
2:22–2:25Mithila called Chadna or Chadna.
2:25–2:30His education, austerities, and direction of a school, however, took place in the village
2:30–2:37of Karyen on the bank of the Kamla River, about 19 kilometers or 12 miles southeast of Darbunga.
2:37–2:42From ancient times, Karyen had been a stronghold of Nyaya philosophy and had earlier been
2:42–2:46the residence of the great philosopher Udayanakarya.
2:46–2:51Politically, this period fell within the reign of the Karnata King Harissi Hadeva,
2:51–2:551295-1326 CE.
2:55–2:59His reign is famous for introducing in Mithila the system of Pange administration for preserving
2:59–3:05genealogies, beginning in 1310 CE.Sanskrit literature and philosophy received unprecedented
3:05–3:10encouragement under the patronage of this dynasty.Accounts of Gangesa's family mention
3:10–3:13his wife, three sons, and one daughter.
3:13–3:18One of his sons, Vardhamana Upadyaya, later became a celebrated Nayayaka in his own
3:18–3:24right and wrote a commentary upon his father's workpoint superscript 3.
3:24–3:30sources and modern debate concerning his social biography.
3:30–3:36Accounts of Ganges's social background appear in the Pangee tradition, modern parallel historiography,
3:36–3:38and regional research.
3:38–3:43These sources present circumstances regarding his birth, lineage, and social acceptance that
3:43–3:46differ from the conventional biography.
3:46–3:50It is stated as undisputed that he was born five years after his father's death
3:50–3:55and that he married a woman of the leatherworking community, the Dapangyi reproduced in Gajendra
3:55–4:01Thakur's book is said to establish this from the original Pangee source. It is also considered
4:01–4:06possible that his maternal village lay in a leatherworker's quarter. The claims that the
4:06–4:12form, date, and textual variants of the available sources or everywhere uniform are presented as
4:12–4:17indisputable historical facts, supported by source-specific evidence and interpretation.
4:17–4:24The Panjhi-based interpretation confirms Gangesa's family connections and an intercast marriage,
4:24–4:28raising the possibility of his social exclusion.
4:28–4:33To reach a decisive conclusion on the matter, the original Panjhi manuscript, its date,
4:33–4:38genealogy, and independent historical evidence have been comparatively examined.
4:38–4:43This debate raises important questions for understanding the relationship among knowledge,
4:43–4:48structure and social prestige in medieval mediala.
4:48–4:52Some critics of modern historiography believe that alternative accounts of Gangesa's social
4:52–4:57life have not received adequate space in mainstream biographies.
4:57–5:02There are allegations that Ramanath Ja and Uday Chandra Ja ushok deliberately concealed
5:02–5:03facts.
5:03–5:08The source states that an impartial examination of the different sources, methods of selection,
5:08–5:11and causes of silence establishes this.
5:11–5:16Gangesa's philosophical importance is beyond dispute, while research into the social dimension
5:16–5:21of his life is said to establish these matters.
5:21–5:24LEGEND AND INTELLICUAL ATTAINMENT
5:24–5:29According to popular tradition and customary narratives, Gangesa was extremely slow-witted,
5:29–5:32inert, and illiterate as a child.
5:32–5:36His father made many attempts to educate him, but when these produced no result he
5:36–5:41was sent to his maternal relatives.There too, his maternal uncle and the uncles' pupils
5:41–5:46tried to teach him. When they failed, they assigned him menial tasks such as filling
5:46–5:51the pipe and bringing the hookah point superscript 1 superscript 3 1 story relates that, through
5:51–5:55the grace of a tantric practitioner engaged in corpse ritual at a cremation ground or
5:55–5:59through a boon from the goddess Kali, an extraordinary illumination of knowledge
5:59–6:04suddenly arose in him. When he returned home, his uncle debated scripture with
6:04–6:09him and was left speechless by Gangesa's arguments.
6:09–6:13This popular narrative is dominated by the miraculous.
6:13–6:18Historically, Gangesa acquired knowledge of the profound principles of ancient philosophy
6:18–6:22through rigorous labor and exceptional genius.
6:22–6:26He was honored with lofty titles such as Muhammad Huppadaya and Juggadguru, distinctions
6:26–6:31bestowed upon only a select number of Nyaya scholars in Mithila.
6:31–6:37The development from ancient Nyaya to Navya Nyaya and its intellectual background.
6:37–6:42Among the six principal orthodox systems of Indian philosophy, Naya, Vaika, Skaya, Yoga,
6:42–6:47MMA with Macron SA with Macron, and Vedanta, Naya is renowned for its logical method.The
6:47–6:51systematic beginning of Naya is traced to the Nyasutra composed by the sage Gautama
6:51–6:52or a captor.
6:52–6:57Approximately in the 2nd century BCE.Ancient Naya was principally based upon an examination
6:57–7:02of 16 categories, means of knowledge, objects of knowledge, doubt, purpose, example, established
7:02–7:05doctrine, members of an argument.
7:05–7:10Hypothetical reasoning, ascertainment, debate, disputation, destructive criticism, fallacious
7:10–7:14reasons, quibbling, futile rejoinders, and points of defeat.to the power of one its
7:14–7:17fundamental aim was to destroy ignorance through true knowledge and ultimately to
7:17–7:22attain release from suffering, apavaga or liberation, by escaping the cycle of birth
7:22–7:24and death.cubed.
7:24–7:30In due course, teachers such as Vatsayana, Adiotakara, Jantaba and Vakaspati Mishra cultivated
7:30–7:36this tradition further.Superscript I in the 10th and 11th centuries, Udayana Karya, another
7:36–7:40great Nayaaka of Mithila, brought ancient Naya into a harmonious synthesis with Vayika
7:40–7:46philosophy, which was chiefly concerned with ontology and atomism.By adding non-existence
7:46–7:51as the seventh category to the six categories of Vayika, Udayana Karya established
7:51–7:54to combine Nyaya-Bhaika ontology.
7:54–7:59By the medieval period, however, Naya philosophy faced a serious intellectual or epistemic
7:59–8:05crisis. On the one hand, Buddhist logicians, especially Digniger, Dharmakirti, and their
8:05–8:09followers, launched powerful attacks upon Naya definitions of perception and inference
8:09–8:13dot to the power of one on the other hand, Rara, the great 12th century teacher of Advaita
8:13–8:17Vedanta, criticized Naya doctrine so sharply in his karnikakjya that the foundations
8:17–8:22of Naya were shaken.squared Rara argued that every definition used in philosophical inquiry
8:22–8:27is unstable. Refuting Udaya Nakharya's definition of knowledge, cognition is an experience of
8:27–8:32reality, he sought to prove that no flawless definition of any worldly object or cognition
8:32–8:36is possible apart from non-duality, Brahmin, everything is indefinable.to the power of
8:36–8:38one.
8:38–8:43To answer this epistemic crisis and defend Nyaya philosophy, Gangesa Upadyaya devised
8:43–8:47a revolutionary analytical method point superscript 2 he abandoned the ancient Nye
8:47–8:53arrangement of 16 categories and concentrated entirely upon the four means of knowledge,
8:53–8:59perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony point superscript 1 his new system,
8:59–9:03marked by terminological clarity, logical precision, and a mathematically structured
9:03–9:08language, came to be called Navi Nye point superscript 1 Gangesa's innovation lay
9:08–9:11less in the originality.
9:11–9:16doctrine then in the novelty of method and style. Its linguistic structure was fashioned
9:16–9:21with such rigor that no room remained for confusion, overextension, under extension,
9:21–9:29or impossibility.Superscript 1. Tat the Sintmai, the foundation of Navya Nyaya and an epistemological
9:29–9:35revolution. The supreme achievement of Gangesa Upadyaya's life is his Tat the Sintmai,
9:35–9:41the jewel of reflection on truth and epistemology, composed during his lifetime around 1325c.The
9:41–9:45work became so celebrated and authoritative that it completely displaced the
9:45–9:51commentarial tradition centered on the ancient Nyasutra. Almost the whole of later Navya-Nyaya
9:51–9:56literature, described here as approximately half of that literature, was written directly on this
9:56–10:01work or in the form of commentaries and sub-commentaries upon at point superscript 1.
10:01–10:07The Tatla Sintma is divided into four sections corresponding to the four nyayamins of knowledge
10:07–10:131. The book on perception, 2. The book on inference, 3. The book on comparison or analogy,
10:13–10:17and 4. The book on verbal testimony points superscript 1.
10:18–10:24Epistemological framework, valid and invalid cognition, a reliable list theory of knowledge
10:24–10:30Gangesa's epistemology is very close to the reliable list and externalist theories of Western
10:30–10:36philosophy, described in the Stanford Encyclopedia as super-reliableism or infallibilism for
10:36–10:42externalists, superscript 3 Gangesa treats veritical cognition, Prama, within an objective
10:42–10:48causal framework. Whereas Western philosophy commonly evaluates belief, Indian philosophy
10:48–10:54evaluates cognition, which is treated as propositional point superscript 3.
10:54–10:58In the production of cognition, a means of knowledge is the principal instrumental cause
10:58–11:03point superscript 3 each means of knowledge has a distinctive trigger, the final and principal
11:03–11:07cause that activates the process.
11:07–11:13Trigger of perception, proximity or contact between a sense faculty and its object
11:13–11:20Trigger of inference, subsumptive reflection upon a reason qualified by invariable concomitance.
11:20–11:24Trigger of verbal testimony, a statement made by a trustworthy person, an honest expert
11:24–11:28who knows the truth and states it without deception, and understood by the hearer point
11:28–11:31superscript 3.
11:31–11:34Gangesa explains that both the truth of a cognition and the correctness of the process
11:34–11:38that produces it are indispensable.cubed if a cognition is false or produced by
11:38–11:42a defective process, it is not for radical cognition but invalid cognition, a prama.
11:43–11:48Invalid cognition arises from pseudo-sources. Although Naya accepts realism and acknowledges
11:48–11:53the possibility of error because of the limitations of human senses and material objects,
11:53–11:56when a cognition is correctly produced it is prama.cube to explain this,
11:56–12:01Gangesa employs the subtle ontological structure of qualifier and qualificon.cubed.
12:03–12:07The doctrine of the validity of cognition, Mme with Mekran asa with Mekran and Naya.
12:08–12:15One of Gangesa's major intellectual disputes with MMA with Macron essay with Macron concerns
12:15–12:19the doctrine of the certification or validity of cognition.
12:19–12:24The Msaaka's uphold intrinsic validity, meaning that a cognition certifies its own truth the
12:24–12:28very moment it arises point superscript 3.
12:28–12:33In a forceful refutation, Gangesa establishes extrinsic validity point superscript 3 he
12:33–12:39He argues that if cognition validated itself, doubt could never arise in the mind.
12:39–12:44Since we experience error and doubt, whether a cognition is true or false must be determined
12:44–12:47by a subsequent and distinct mental process.
12:47–12:52This process is the capacity for successful activity point superscript 3 of an action
12:52–12:57inspired by a cognition succeeds, for example, one sees water, attempts to drink it, and
12:57–13:01quenches once thirst, the cognition is valid and possesses merit, otherwise it
13:01–13:04is defective invalid cognition.
13:04–13:09Gangesa here employs Udayanakarya's pragmatic contradiction, where doubt exists, practical
13:09–13:14conduct cannot proceed, and where regular conduct occurs, doubt cannot persist.
13:14–13:17SuperScript 3
13:17–13:23The perception section, the primary source of cognition and sense-object relation.
13:23–13:27The first section of the Tatvasant My Concerns Perception.
13:27–13:31Gangesa treats perception as a fundamental cause in the production of cognition.
13:31–13:36The word pratyaka literally refers to what is before the eyes or senses.
13:36–13:40For Gangesa, perception is not merely sense produced cognition but is factive.
13:40–13:45If a cognition proves false, as when a shell is mistaken for silver, it is not called
13:45–13:48perception under his definition but error, explained through the theory of apprehending
13:48–13:52one thing as another dot cube such error arises from a prior disposition lodged in
13:52–13:57memory when sense object contact is defective dot cubed.
13:57–14:00sense-object relation.
14:00–14:04Gangesa provides an exceptionally subtle analysis of six kinds of ordinary sense-object relation
14:04–14:07required for perceptual cognition.
14:07–14:13These relations are founded upon viagra ontology, substance, quality, action, universal, particularity,
14:13–14:17inheritance, and absence.cubed.
14:17–14:19Extraordinary perception
14:19–14:23Western empiricism accepts only cognition apprehended by the senses, but Gangesa
14:23–14:27gives a detailed account of three forms of extraordinary perception, making Nair a complete
14:27–14:33epistemology.to the power of one first, perception through a universal characteristic, Sanyalaka
14:33–14:38upon perceiving one object, the entire class or universal of that object becomes known.
14:38–14:42For example, seeing one particular instance of smoke produces an awareness of smokehood
14:42–14:47in general. Without this, knowledge of pervasion or induction would be impossible.to
14:47–14:51the power of one second, perception through a cognition as characteristic, Jnallaka
14:51–14:56this is a memory-based cross-modal perception. For example, upon seeing sandalwood from a distance,
14:56–15:00one directly apprehends that it is fragrant without smelling it, the fragrance is perceived
15:00–15:05through the conjunction of vision and memory.The power of one-third, yogically generated perception,
15:05–15:10yogajah the immediate perception that yogins have of past, future, hidden, and distant
15:10–15:14objects through the power of austerity, yoga, and meditation.The power of one.
15:14–15:191. Indeterminate and Determinate Perception
15:19–15:23Another profound aspect of Novianaya is the distinction between indeterminate, concept-free
15:23–15:28perception and determinate, concept-laden perception.cube. The distinction began with
15:28–15:32Vikaspati Mishra, but Gangesa brought it to completion.cube. According to Gangesa,
15:32–15:37a complete cognition of an object, such as, this is a cow, is determinate perception,
15:37–15:41in which the relation between the Qualificant, the Cow, and the Qualifier, Cowhood,
15:41–15:42is manifest.
15:42–15:47Gangesa, however, presents a thought experiment.
15:47–15:51When a child sees a cow for the first time, no prior disposition of cowhood is present
15:51–15:52in the mind.
15:52–15:57In this first perceptual experience, the child sees only an object and its property separately
15:57–15:59but cannot yet connect them.
15:59–16:03This pure initial awareness, devoid of name and class and lacking the relation of qualificant
16:03–16:08and qualifier, is indeterminate perception.cubed it is indispensable to Naya realism,
16:08–16:11it shows that the human mind does not create concepts out of nothing but derives them from
16:11–16:16physical reality, determinate perception could not arise without indeterminate perception
16:16–16:18dot cubed.
16:18–16:21Aperception and Yovia Vaseya.
16:21–16:26Gangesa examines a special kind of mental perception called Aperception.
16:26–16:30It is an after cognition, a cognition of cognition dot cubed internal perception,
16:30–16:34of pleasure, pain, thought, and the self, occurs through the mind.
16:34–16:39When we see something that is the primary cognition, the self-awareness, I am seeing this, is a
16:39–16:41perception.
16:41–16:45Gangesa holds that error is possible in external perception, but there can be no error in experiencing
16:45–16:50the form in which the object appears within the scoped content of a perception.
16:50–16:53A perception can also take an illusion within its scope.
16:53–16:57For example, if a person suffering from jaundice sees a white wall as yellow, a perception
16:57–17:03enables the person to know, the wall appears yellow to me, although this is an illusion.
17:03–17:08thus directs the examination of a cognition's validity dot cubed.
17:08–17:14The inference section, the culmination of logical structure and the debate over perversion.
17:14–17:19The inference section of the tatva-sintmai is the most celebrated, extensive, and complex
17:19–17:22part of the work informs its center.
17:22–17:29Its subtlety and logical acuity place Navya-nyaya among the world's finest systems of logic.
17:29–17:33According to Gangesa, inference is the process by which the unknown is known on the basis
17:33–17:39of a known relation, both for oneself and for others point superscript one.
17:39–17:43Inference has three principal constituents, one, the subject, Parker, the locus of inferential
17:43–17:47cognition in which something is to be established and about which knowledge is desired, such
17:47–17:49as a mountain, two.
17:49–17:54The probandom, sad her, the property or object to be established, such as fire,
17:54–17:55and three.
17:55–18:00reason or prover, hitu or sodhana, on the basis of which the probandam is established,
18:00–18:01such as smoke.cubed.
18:01–18:07Provision, vayapti, or natural entailment.
18:07–18:12The life and logical foundation of every inference is Provision, the eternal, unchanging,
18:12–18:17and natural relation between reason and probandam, wherever there is smoke, there is fire,
18:17–18:23superscript 3 the debate over Provision was a principal cause of the rise of Navinyaya.
18:23–18:28Four Gangesa, Buddhist logicians and ancient Nayakas had offered 24 different definitions
18:28–18:33of pervasion, including the five definitions of pervasion, but they were circular, obscure,
18:33–18:36or incapable of excluding an Upadi point superscript 3.
18:36–18:42Gangesa rejected all 24 and established his own final, conclusive definition point superscript
18:42–18:443.
18:44–18:48According to his conclusive definition, pervasion consists in the reasons non-occurrence
18:48–18:52wherever the probandum is absent, pervasion is the non-occurrence of the reason in
18:52–18:57the locus of the absence of the probandum, superscript 1 the Stanford Encyclopedia is
18:57–19:02cited as explaining this further, where the probandum is wholly absent, the reason must
19:02–19:08also be absent. If the probandum is a universal property, its absence cannot coexist with
19:08–19:11the reason, superscript 3.
19:11–19:16Gangesa's definition is highly refined and successfully resolves difficult problems
19:16–19:20involving properties that do not pervade their entire locus point superscript 3
19:20–19:24One example is the conjunction of a monkey with a tree.
19:24–19:29The monkey is on a branch but not at the root, consequently, the tree contains both conjunction
19:29–19:33with the monkey and an absence of that conjunction.
19:33–19:37Older definitions would invalidate such an inference, but Gangesa's conclusive definition
19:37–19:41treats it as valid because conjunction with the monkey is not wholly absent from the
19:41–19:45entire tree point superscript 3.
19:45–19:49Knowledge of pervasion arises through an inductive process.
19:49–19:55It takes repeated and extensive observation as its basis, comprising
19:55–20:00Positive concomitance, or the similar instance, where the probandom is present, the reason
20:00–20:05is also present, as in a kitchen, which serves as the example.
20:05–20:09Negative concomitance, or the dissimilar instance, where the probandom is absent,
20:09–20:14the reason is also absent, as in a pond point superscript 3 this produces a disposition
20:14–20:18in the mind that recalls pervasion at the time of subsumptive reflection point superscript
20:18–20:243 Gangesa also employs hypothetical reasoning, which is not itself a direct means of knowledge
20:24–20:28but strengthens pervasion by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary through
20:28–20:34reductio ad absurdum point superscript 3. The extraneous condition, Upity.
20:36–20:40And Upity is an additional condition or concealed circumstance that defeats pervasion
20:40–20:45initiates an inference, functioning as an epistemic defeater point superscript 3.
20:45–20:50its technical definition is that it pervades the probandum wherever the probandum occurs,
20:50–20:53the upadee necessarily occurs, but does not pervade the reason.
20:54–20:58Gangesa devotes the 10th division of the inference section to its examination
20:58–21:03point superscript 3 the point may be illustrated as follows, Al becomes angry,
21:03–21:08therefore he will engage in violence. Here Bell's presence is an additional condition.
21:08–21:14Al becomes violent only when Belle is present, if Belle is absent, Al will not do so.
21:14–21:21Identification of the Upadee thus prevents a false provision and removes the logical error point superscript 3.
21:21–21:26Phalacious reasons and logical defects, Het Vabasa.
21:26–21:34Gangesa gives an exceptionally systematic classification of phalacious reasons, what appears to be a reason but is not.
21:34–21:37They are of five kinds.
21:37–21:45In addition, Gangesa discusses feudal rejoinders based on false analogies and points of defeat
21:45–21:53in debate, although he regards these as forms of stratagem and intellectual controversy.
21:53–21:57Philosophical inferences, establishing God and the self.
21:57–22:02In the inference section, Gangesa conducts three major philosophical inquiries regarded
22:02–22:07as milestones in Indian philosophy point superscript 3 first, the inference of God,
22:07–22:12refuting the atheism of themsaka and Buddhist systems, Gangesa establishes the existence
22:12–22:16of God through inference point superscript 3 his argument is that earth, sprouts, and
22:16–22:21similar things are products and must therefore have a conscious maker, just as a pot, being
22:21–22:25a product, has a potter as its maker.
22:25–22:29Buddhists offered growing grass as a counter example, arguing that grass is a product
22:29–22:31without a maker.
22:31–22:36Gangesa replies that growing grass is itself the inferential subject, and to offer the subject
22:36–22:39as the example is to beg the question.
22:39–22:41The Buddhist
22:41–22:46The comparison and verbal testimony sections, linguistic knowledge and the determination
22:46–22:49of meaning.
22:49–22:53Comparison as a means of knowledge.
22:53–22:56The third section of the Tattvasant My Concerns Comparison
22:56–23:01Although brief, Gangesa regards comparison as an independent means of knowledge.
23:01–23:05Through it, the designation or name of a new object becomes known on the basis of similarity.
23:05–23:12To the power of one, for example, a person is told, Gavya, or Wild Ox, resembles a cow.
23:12–23:16When the person later sees a cow-like animal in the forest, similarity enables the recognition,
23:16–23:19this is a Gavya.
23:19–23:23Verbal testimony as a means of knowledge.
23:23–23:27The fourth section concerns verbal testimony.
23:27–23:32Anjisa regards testimony as an independent, irreducible, and factive source of cognition
23:32–23:36point superscript 1 according to the maxim, the instruction of a trustworthy person is
23:36–23:41verbal testimony, a statement made by a reliable speaker, one who speaks truthfully and has
23:41–23:42no
23:42–23:48Refutation of vayaka and Buddhist views, vayaka included verbal testimony under inference.
23:48–23:51Its argument was that verbal cognition is inferential, speaker A uttered statement
23:51–23:57B, speaker A is trustworthy, trustworthy person's statement is true, therefore B is true.
23:57–24:01Gangesa forcefully objects, how can this inference even begin?
24:01–24:05To know the first premise, speaker A uttered statement B, verbal testimony must already
24:05–24:09be accepted as an independent means of knowledge.
24:09–24:12Without testimony, even the inference's preliminary premise cannot be understood.Cubed
24:12–24:17Buddhist Yogacaras, on the other hand, regarded language as merely a pragmatic instrument
24:17–24:22with no relation to reality, useful only for fulfilling desires or avoiding harm.
24:22–24:26Gangesa rejects this and establishes that veridical testimony produces objective cognition,
24:26–24:30whereas defective or misleading utterances fail to produce knowledge.
24:30–24:33Language is a vehicle of reality.cubed.
24:34–24:38Determination of meaning and the hearer's point of view, semantics.
24:39–24:40To a
24:40–24:44Metila's intellectual heritage and the historical expansion of Navianyaya.
24:44–24:50The lamp of Navya-Nyaya knowledge kindled by Gangesa Upadyaya illuminated Mithila's
24:50–24:56intellectual tradition for centuries and reshaped intellectual debate across the Indian subcontinent.
24:57–25:02After him, a long, continuous, and rich tradition of Nyaya learning flourished in Mithila.
25:03–25:09His able son Vardamana Upadyaya extended his father's tradition by composing the Tatthasint
25:09–25:14Miprakasa upon the Tathasintmai point superscript 3.
25:14–25:20In the 15th century, around 1452 CE, Pātkidhara Mishra, also known as Jaya Diva Mishra, became
25:20–25:27another great pillar of Naviyanaya and composed the enduring commentary Tathasintmai aloka.
25:27–25:31His learning was acknowledged throughout India.
25:31–25:36Eminent Nayakas such as Vasudeva Mishra, Rusadatta Mishra, Bajaratha Kura, Mahisa
25:36–25:40Sikura, the founder of the Darbhanga Raj and Akara Mishra established the splendor of
25:40–25:44Mithila's learning throughout India, while this tradition of knowledge flourished under
25:44–25:49the patronage of the rulers of the Oynawar dynasty.
25:49–25:53The movement from Mithila to Bengal, Navadvipa.
25:53–25:58A crucial historical turning point in Navya Nyaaya came when the gifted Bengali scholar
25:58–26:03Vasudeva Sarvabhama, in the 16th century, came to Mithila and studied Nyaaya philosophy
26:03–26:09under Paket Haramishra. A strict traditional rule in Mithila prohibited outside students
26:09–26:14from carrying manuscripts away, thereby preserving Mithila's intellectual monopoly.
26:14–26:20Pts 1 superscript 1 Bussadeva Sarvabhama, however, used his extraordinary memory to commit
26:20–26:26the entire Tathasintma in Udayana Karyas Kusumungali to memory. He then travelled through Kasi
26:26–26:31to Navadvipa in Bengal and established a new branch of Navya Naya their Pts superscript
26:31–26:39In time, his pupils Raghunatha Iromai, author of the Dittai commentary, Mathuranatha Tarkabajasa,
26:39–26:45Jagadisa Tarklakra, and Gadotha Bakriya carried Naviyanya to the summit of logical sophistication
26:45–26:50point superscript 2. Gadotha Bakriya's theory of objectness and theory of semantic power
26:50–26:54endowed the language of Naviyanya with unimaginable subtlety in philosophical depth
26:54–27:00point superscript 2. The artificial and exact technical vocabulary of Naviyanya proved
27:00–27:06so powerful and precise that later scholars in fields such as grammar, Ayurveda, Dharmasastra,
27:06–27:11literature, Tuntra, and Advaita Vedanta began composing their works in its language.In the
27:11–27:16modern period, philosophers such as Professor John Batonki and Sibhajibhan Bhattacharya have
27:16–27:21established the global importance of this logical language of Navya Naya Point superscript 2.
27:23–27:24Conclusion
27:24–27:32Gangesa Upadyaya and his timeless Tathasintmai constituted golden and unique chapter in Indian
27:32–27:37philosophical thought, presenting one of its finest examples of objectivity, logical rigor,
27:37–27:43and structural analysis of cognition. He not only assimilated the traditions of ancient
27:43–27:47Nyaaya and Vayika but gave them new life and direction, making epistemology, rather than
27:47–27:54ontology, the central concern of Indian philosophy. His logical method, Navya Nyaaya,
27:54–27:59is a marvel of the human mind's analytical capacity, its terminological clarity is comparable to,
27:59–28:03and at times presented as more profound than, modern analytic philosophy.
28:04–28:09His precise definition of perversion, discussion of the Upady, subtle treatment of
28:09–28:13apperception, and logical proof of God testify to his unequaled intellect.
28:15–28:20Pange based and modern interpretations of Gangesa's life raise a broad social question.
28:20–28:24What was the relationship between intellectual genius and status based on birth?
28:25–28:31There is no complete agreement concerning these views. Nevertheless, his philosophical achievement
28:31–28:36makes clear that the value of reasoning, study, and knowledge is not determined by caste or social
28:36–28:43boundaries. The logical discipline of Navyañaya creates an intellectual domain in which the
28:43–28:48value of a proposition is determined not by birth or prestige but by evidence and reasoning.
28:48–28:53developing. Developed in Mithila, this method reached Navadvipa and other centres of learning
28:53–28:59in India and became the basis of a long-standing commentarial tradition. In this sense, the
28:59–29:04Tatvasintmai is an important representative work of the analytical genius of Mithila
29:04–29:05and of India as a whole.

Plain text

गंजिसा उपद्याया अनावियन्याय, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टमालोचना, अपिस्टम Yaya, who initiated Navya-Nyaya, the new logic, in the 14th century and completely transformed the direction, condition, and analytical method of Indian philosophy point superscript one is timeless and immortal work, the Tattvasintmai, the jewel of thought on the nature of things, proved to be a milestone not only for Nyaya philosophy but for the whole of Indian epistemology. In its light, every later philosophical school, whether Vedanta, MMA with Mekron Anissa with Mekron, or Buddhism, was compelled to reassess its doctrines.Superscript 3. Ancient Nyaya was based upon the Nyaya Sutra of the Sage Godama and the examination of its 16 categories. Gangesa Upadyaya placed the theory of the means of knowledge at the center and developed a new analytical method founded on the four sources of cognition, perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony. This chapter considers, at distinct levels, the structure of the work, the technical language of Naviyanya, the tradition of its study from Mithila to Navadvipa, and the established facts, traditional narratives, and modern interpretations concerning Gangesa's life. Historical context, biography, and the nature of the sources. Period, birthplace, and family background. The period of Gangesa Upadyada, also called Gangesa or Gangesapadyaya, is generally placed in the closing phase of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th, approximately 1300-1350 CE. Superscript III distinguished historians such as Dinesh Chandrabat Tacharya, as well as the Pateran Cyclopedia, place his active period around 1320 CE.Superscript I he was born in a poor Mephile Brahman family of the Kasaiyapagatra in a village of Mithila called Chadna or Chadna. His education, austerities, and direction of a school, however, took place in the village of Karyen on the bank of the Kamla River, about 19 kilometers or 12 miles southeast of Darbunga. From ancient times, Karyen had been a stronghold of Nyaya philosophy and had earlier been the residence of the great philosopher Udayanakarya. Politically, this period fell within the reign of the Karnata King Harissi Hadeva, 1295-1326 CE. His reign is famous for introducing in Mithila the system of Pange administration for preserving genealogies, beginning in 1310 CE.Sanskrit literature and philosophy received unprecedented encouragement under the patronage of this dynasty.Accounts of Gangesa's family mention his wife, three sons, and one daughter. One of his sons, Vardhamana Upadyaya, later became a celebrated Nayayaka in his own right and wrote a commentary upon his father's workpoint superscript 3. sources and modern debate concerning his social biography. Accounts of Ganges's social background appear in the Pangee tradition, modern parallel historiography, and regional research. These sources present circumstances regarding his birth, lineage, and social acceptance that differ from the conventional biography. It is stated as undisputed that he was born five years after his father's death and that he married a woman of the leatherworking community, the Dapangyi reproduced in Gajendra Thakur's book is said to establish this from the original Pangee source. It is also considered possible that his maternal village lay in a leatherworker's quarter. The claims that the form, date, and textual variants of the available sources or everywhere uniform are presented as indisputable historical facts, supported by source-specific evidence and interpretation. The Panjhi-based interpretation confirms Gangesa's family connections and an intercast marriage, raising the possibility of his social exclusion. To reach a decisive conclusion on the matter, the original Panjhi manuscript, its date, genealogy, and independent historical evidence have been comparatively examined. This debate raises important questions for understanding the relationship among knowledge, structure and social prestige in medieval mediala. Some critics of modern historiography believe that alternative accounts of Gangesa's social life have not received adequate space in mainstream biographies. There are allegations that Ramanath Ja and Uday Chandra Ja ushok deliberately concealed facts. The source states that an impartial examination of the different sources, methods of selection, and causes of silence establishes this. Gangesa's philosophical importance is beyond dispute, while research into the social dimension of his life is said to establish these matters. LEGEND AND INTELLICUAL ATTAINMENT According to popular tradition and customary narratives, Gangesa was extremely slow-witted, inert, and illiterate as a child. His father made many attempts to educate him, but when these produced no result he was sent to his maternal relatives.There too, his maternal uncle and the uncles' pupils tried to teach him. When they failed, they assigned him menial tasks such as filling the pipe and bringing the hookah point superscript 1 superscript 3 1 story relates that, through the grace of a tantric practitioner engaged in corpse ritual at a cremation ground or through a boon from the goddess Kali, an extraordinary illumination of knowledge suddenly arose in him. When he returned home, his uncle debated scripture with him and was left speechless by Gangesa's arguments. This popular narrative is dominated by the miraculous. Historically, Gangesa acquired knowledge of the profound principles of ancient philosophy through rigorous labor and exceptional genius. He was honored with lofty titles such as Muhammad Huppadaya and Juggadguru, distinctions bestowed upon only a select number of Nyaya scholars in Mithila. The development from ancient Nyaya to Navya Nyaya and its intellectual background. Among the six principal orthodox systems of Indian philosophy, Naya, Vaika, Skaya, Yoga, MMA with Macron SA with Macron, and Vedanta, Naya is renowned for its logical method.The systematic beginning of Naya is traced to the Nyasutra composed by the sage Gautama or a captor. Approximately in the 2nd century BCE.Ancient Naya was principally based upon an examination of 16 categories, means of knowledge, objects of knowledge, doubt, purpose, example, established doctrine, members of an argument. Hypothetical reasoning, ascertainment, debate, disputation, destructive criticism, fallacious reasons, quibbling, futile rejoinders, and points of defeat.to the power of one its fundamental aim was to destroy ignorance through true knowledge and ultimately to attain release from suffering, apavaga or liberation, by escaping the cycle of birth and death.cubed. In due course, teachers such as Vatsayana, Adiotakara, Jantaba and Vakaspati Mishra cultivated this tradition further.Superscript I in the 10th and 11th centuries, Udayana Karya, another great Nayaaka of Mithila, brought ancient Naya into a harmonious synthesis with Vayika philosophy, which was chiefly concerned with ontology and atomism.By adding non-existence as the seventh category to the six categories of Vayika, Udayana Karya established to combine Nyaya-Bhaika ontology. By the medieval period, however, Naya philosophy faced a serious intellectual or epistemic crisis. On the one hand, Buddhist logicians, especially Digniger, Dharmakirti, and their followers, launched powerful attacks upon Naya definitions of perception and inference dot to the power of one on the other hand, Rara, the great 12th century teacher of Advaita Vedanta, criticized Naya doctrine so sharply in his karnikakjya that the foundations of Naya were shaken.squared Rara argued that every definition used in philosophical inquiry is unstable. Refuting Udaya Nakharya's definition of knowledge, cognition is an experience of reality, he sought to prove that no flawless definition of any worldly object or cognition is possible apart from non-duality, Brahmin, everything is indefinable.to the power of one. To answer this epistemic crisis and defend Nyaya philosophy, Gangesa Upadyaya devised a revolutionary analytical method point superscript 2 he abandoned the ancient Nye arrangement of 16 categories and concentrated entirely upon the four means of knowledge, perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony point superscript 1 his new system, marked by terminological clarity, logical precision, and a mathematically structured language, came to be called Navi Nye point superscript 1 Gangesa's innovation lay less in the originality. doctrine then in the novelty of method and style. Its linguistic structure was fashioned with such rigor that no room remained for confusion, overextension, under extension, or impossibility.Superscript 1. Tat the Sintmai, the foundation of Navya Nyaya and an epistemological revolution. The supreme achievement of Gangesa Upadyaya's life is his Tat the Sintmai, the jewel of reflection on truth and epistemology, composed during his lifetime around 1325c.The work became so celebrated and authoritative that it completely displaced the commentarial tradition centered on the ancient Nyasutra. Almost the whole of later Navya-Nyaya literature, described here as approximately half of that literature, was written directly on this work or in the form of commentaries and sub-commentaries upon at point superscript 1. The Tatla Sintma is divided into four sections corresponding to the four nyayamins of knowledge 1. The book on perception, 2. The book on inference, 3. The book on comparison or analogy, and 4. The book on verbal testimony points superscript 1. Epistemological framework, valid and invalid cognition, a reliable list theory of knowledge Gangesa's epistemology is very close to the reliable list and externalist theories of Western philosophy, described in the Stanford Encyclopedia as super-reliableism or infallibilism for externalists, superscript 3 Gangesa treats veritical cognition, Prama, within an objective causal framework. Whereas Western philosophy commonly evaluates belief, Indian philosophy evaluates cognition, which is treated as propositional point superscript 3. In the production of cognition, a means of knowledge is the principal instrumental cause point superscript 3 each means of knowledge has a distinctive trigger, the final and principal cause that activates the process. Trigger of perception, proximity or contact between a sense faculty and its object Trigger of inference, subsumptive reflection upon a reason qualified by invariable concomitance. Trigger of verbal testimony, a statement made by a trustworthy person, an honest expert who knows the truth and states it without deception, and understood by the hearer point superscript 3. Gangesa explains that both the truth of a cognition and the correctness of the process that produces it are indispensable.cubed if a cognition is false or produced by a defective process, it is not for radical cognition but invalid cognition, a prama. Invalid cognition arises from pseudo-sources. Although Naya accepts realism and acknowledges the possibility of error because of the limitations of human senses and material objects, when a cognition is correctly produced it is prama.cube to explain this, Gangesa employs the subtle ontological structure of qualifier and qualificon.cubed. The doctrine of the validity of cognition, Mme with Mekran asa with Mekran and Naya. One of Gangesa's major intellectual disputes with MMA with Macron essay with Macron concerns the doctrine of the certification or validity of cognition. The Msaaka's uphold intrinsic validity, meaning that a cognition certifies its own truth the very moment it arises point superscript 3. In a forceful refutation, Gangesa establishes extrinsic validity point superscript 3 he He argues that if cognition validated itself, doubt could never arise in the mind. Since we experience error and doubt, whether a cognition is true or false must be determined by a subsequent and distinct mental process. This process is the capacity for successful activity point superscript 3 of an action inspired by a cognition succeeds, for example, one sees water, attempts to drink it, and quenches once thirst, the cognition is valid and possesses merit, otherwise it is defective invalid cognition. Gangesa here employs Udayanakarya's pragmatic contradiction, where doubt exists, practical conduct cannot proceed, and where regular conduct occurs, doubt cannot persist. SuperScript 3 The perception section, the primary source of cognition and sense-object relation. The first section of the Tatvasant My Concerns Perception. Gangesa treats perception as a fundamental cause in the production of cognition. The word pratyaka literally refers to what is before the eyes or senses. For Gangesa, perception is not merely sense produced cognition but is factive. If a cognition proves false, as when a shell is mistaken for silver, it is not called perception under his definition but error, explained through the theory of apprehending one thing as another dot cube such error arises from a prior disposition lodged in memory when sense object contact is defective dot cubed. sense-object relation. Gangesa provides an exceptionally subtle analysis of six kinds of ordinary sense-object relation required for perceptual cognition. These relations are founded upon viagra ontology, substance, quality, action, universal, particularity, inheritance, and absence.cubed. Extraordinary perception Western empiricism accepts only cognition apprehended by the senses, but Gangesa gives a detailed account of three forms of extraordinary perception, making Nair a complete epistemology.to the power of one first, perception through a universal characteristic, Sanyalaka upon perceiving one object, the entire class or universal of that object becomes known. For example, seeing one particular instance of smoke produces an awareness of smokehood in general. Without this, knowledge of pervasion or induction would be impossible.to the power of one second, perception through a cognition as characteristic, Jnallaka this is a memory-based cross-modal perception. For example, upon seeing sandalwood from a distance, one directly apprehends that it is fragrant without smelling it, the fragrance is perceived through the conjunction of vision and memory.The power of one-third, yogically generated perception, yogajah the immediate perception that yogins have of past, future, hidden, and distant objects through the power of austerity, yoga, and meditation.The power of one. 1. Indeterminate and Determinate Perception Another profound aspect of Novianaya is the distinction between indeterminate, concept-free perception and determinate, concept-laden perception.cube. The distinction began with Vikaspati Mishra, but Gangesa brought it to completion.cube. According to Gangesa, a complete cognition of an object, such as, this is a cow, is determinate perception, in which the relation between the Qualificant, the Cow, and the Qualifier, Cowhood, is manifest. Gangesa, however, presents a thought experiment. When a child sees a cow for the first time, no prior disposition of cowhood is present in the mind. In this first perceptual experience, the child sees only an object and its property separately but cannot yet connect them. This pure initial awareness, devoid of name and class and lacking the relation of qualificant and qualifier, is indeterminate perception.cubed it is indispensable to Naya realism, it shows that the human mind does not create concepts out of nothing but derives them from physical reality, determinate perception could not arise without indeterminate perception dot cubed. Aperception and Yovia Vaseya. Gangesa examines a special kind of mental perception called Aperception. It is an after cognition, a cognition of cognition dot cubed internal perception, of pleasure, pain, thought, and the self, occurs through the mind. When we see something that is the primary cognition, the self-awareness, I am seeing this, is a perception. Gangesa holds that error is possible in external perception, but there can be no error in experiencing the form in which the object appears within the scoped content of a perception. A perception can also take an illusion within its scope. For example, if a person suffering from jaundice sees a white wall as yellow, a perception enables the person to know, the wall appears yellow to me, although this is an illusion. thus directs the examination of a cognition's validity dot cubed. The inference section, the culmination of logical structure and the debate over perversion. The inference section of the tatva-sintmai is the most celebrated, extensive, and complex part of the work informs its center. Its subtlety and logical acuity place Navya-nyaya among the world's finest systems of logic. According to Gangesa, inference is the process by which the unknown is known on the basis of a known relation, both for oneself and for others point superscript one. Inference has three principal constituents, one, the subject, Parker, the locus of inferential cognition in which something is to be established and about which knowledge is desired, such as a mountain, two. The probandom, sad her, the property or object to be established, such as fire, and three. reason or prover, hitu or sodhana, on the basis of which the probandam is established, such as smoke.cubed. Provision, vayapti, or natural entailment. The life and logical foundation of every inference is Provision, the eternal, unchanging, and natural relation between reason and probandam, wherever there is smoke, there is fire, superscript 3 the debate over Provision was a principal cause of the rise of Navinyaya. Four Gangesa, Buddhist logicians and ancient Nayakas had offered 24 different definitions of pervasion, including the five definitions of pervasion, but they were circular, obscure, or incapable of excluding an Upadi point superscript 3. Gangesa rejected all 24 and established his own final, conclusive definition point superscript 3. According to his conclusive definition, pervasion consists in the reasons non-occurrence wherever the probandum is absent, pervasion is the non-occurrence of the reason in the locus of the absence of the probandum, superscript 1 the Stanford Encyclopedia is cited as explaining this further, where the probandum is wholly absent, the reason must also be absent. If the probandum is a universal property, its absence cannot coexist with the reason, superscript 3. Gangesa's definition is highly refined and successfully resolves difficult problems involving properties that do not pervade their entire locus point superscript 3 One example is the conjunction of a monkey with a tree. The monkey is on a branch but not at the root, consequently, the tree contains both conjunction with the monkey and an absence of that conjunction. Older definitions would invalidate such an inference, but Gangesa's conclusive definition treats it as valid because conjunction with the monkey is not wholly absent from the entire tree point superscript 3. Knowledge of pervasion arises through an inductive process. It takes repeated and extensive observation as its basis, comprising Positive concomitance, or the similar instance, where the probandom is present, the reason is also present, as in a kitchen, which serves as the example. Negative concomitance, or the dissimilar instance, where the probandom is absent, the reason is also absent, as in a pond point superscript 3 this produces a disposition in the mind that recalls pervasion at the time of subsumptive reflection point superscript 3 Gangesa also employs hypothetical reasoning, which is not itself a direct means of knowledge but strengthens pervasion by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary through reductio ad absurdum point superscript 3. The extraneous condition, Upity. And Upity is an additional condition or concealed circumstance that defeats pervasion initiates an inference, functioning as an epistemic defeater point superscript 3. its technical definition is that it pervades the probandum wherever the probandum occurs, the upadee necessarily occurs, but does not pervade the reason. Gangesa devotes the 10th division of the inference section to its examination point superscript 3 the point may be illustrated as follows, Al becomes angry, therefore he will engage in violence. Here Bell's presence is an additional condition. Al becomes violent only when Belle is present, if Belle is absent, Al will not do so. Identification of the Upadee thus prevents a false provision and removes the logical error point superscript 3. Phalacious reasons and logical defects, Het Vabasa. Gangesa gives an exceptionally systematic classification of phalacious reasons, what appears to be a reason but is not. They are of five kinds. In addition, Gangesa discusses feudal rejoinders based on false analogies and points of defeat in debate, although he regards these as forms of stratagem and intellectual controversy. Philosophical inferences, establishing God and the self. In the inference section, Gangesa conducts three major philosophical inquiries regarded as milestones in Indian philosophy point superscript 3 first, the inference of God, refuting the atheism of themsaka and Buddhist systems, Gangesa establishes the existence of God through inference point superscript 3 his argument is that earth, sprouts, and similar things are products and must therefore have a conscious maker, just as a pot, being a product, has a potter as its maker. Buddhists offered growing grass as a counter example, arguing that grass is a product without a maker. Gangesa replies that growing grass is itself the inferential subject, and to offer the subject as the example is to beg the question. The Buddhist The comparison and verbal testimony sections, linguistic knowledge and the determination of meaning. Comparison as a means of knowledge. The third section of the Tattvasant My Concerns Comparison Although brief, Gangesa regards comparison as an independent means of knowledge. Through it, the designation or name of a new object becomes known on the basis of similarity. To the power of one, for example, a person is told, Gavya, or Wild Ox, resembles a cow. When the person later sees a cow-like animal in the forest, similarity enables the recognition, this is a Gavya. Verbal testimony as a means of knowledge. The fourth section concerns verbal testimony. Anjisa regards testimony as an independent, irreducible, and factive source of cognition point superscript 1 according to the maxim, the instruction of a trustworthy person is verbal testimony, a statement made by a reliable speaker, one who speaks truthfully and has no Refutation of vayaka and Buddhist views, vayaka included verbal testimony under inference. Its argument was that verbal cognition is inferential, speaker A uttered statement B, speaker A is trustworthy, trustworthy person's statement is true, therefore B is true. Gangesa forcefully objects, how can this inference even begin? To know the first premise, speaker A uttered statement B, verbal testimony must already be accepted as an independent means of knowledge. Without testimony, even the inference's preliminary premise cannot be understood.Cubed Buddhist Yogacaras, on the other hand, regarded language as merely a pragmatic instrument with no relation to reality, useful only for fulfilling desires or avoiding harm. Gangesa rejects this and establishes that veridical testimony produces objective cognition, whereas defective or misleading utterances fail to produce knowledge. Language is a vehicle of reality.cubed. Determination of meaning and the hearer's point of view, semantics. To a Metila's intellectual heritage and the historical expansion of Navianyaya. The lamp of Navya-Nyaya knowledge kindled by Gangesa Upadyaya illuminated Mithila's intellectual tradition for centuries and reshaped intellectual debate across the Indian subcontinent. After him, a long, continuous, and rich tradition of Nyaya learning flourished in Mithila. His able son Vardamana Upadyaya extended his father's tradition by composing the Tatthasint Miprakasa upon the Tathasintmai point superscript 3. In the 15th century, around 1452 CE, Pātkidhara Mishra, also known as Jaya Diva Mishra, became another great pillar of Naviyanaya and composed the enduring commentary Tathasintmai aloka. His learning was acknowledged throughout India. Eminent Nayakas such as Vasudeva Mishra, Rusadatta Mishra, Bajaratha Kura, Mahisa Sikura, the founder of the Darbhanga Raj and Akara Mishra established the splendor of Mithila's learning throughout India, while this tradition of knowledge flourished under the patronage of the rulers of the Oynawar dynasty. The movement from Mithila to Bengal, Navadvipa. A crucial historical turning point in Navya Nyaaya came when the gifted Bengali scholar Vasudeva Sarvabhama, in the 16th century, came to Mithila and studied Nyaaya philosophy under Paket Haramishra. A strict traditional rule in Mithila prohibited outside students from carrying manuscripts away, thereby preserving Mithila's intellectual monopoly. Pts 1 superscript 1 Bussadeva Sarvabhama, however, used his extraordinary memory to commit the entire Tathasintma in Udayana Karyas Kusumungali to memory. He then travelled through Kasi to Navadvipa in Bengal and established a new branch of Navya Naya their Pts superscript In time, his pupils Raghunatha Iromai, author of the Dittai commentary, Mathuranatha Tarkabajasa, Jagadisa Tarklakra, and Gadotha Bakriya carried Naviyanya to the summit of logical sophistication point superscript 2. Gadotha Bakriya's theory of objectness and theory of semantic power endowed the language of Naviyanya with unimaginable subtlety in philosophical depth point superscript 2. The artificial and exact technical vocabulary of Naviyanya proved so powerful and precise that later scholars in fields such as grammar, Ayurveda, Dharmasastra, literature, Tuntra, and Advaita Vedanta began composing their works in its language.In the modern period, philosophers such as Professor John Batonki and Sibhajibhan Bhattacharya have established the global importance of this logical language of Navya Naya Point superscript 2. Conclusion Gangesa Upadyaya and his timeless Tathasintmai constituted golden and unique chapter in Indian philosophical thought, presenting one of its finest examples of objectivity, logical rigor, and structural analysis of cognition. He not only assimilated the traditions of ancient Nyaaya and Vayika but gave them new life and direction, making epistemology, rather than ontology, the central concern of Indian philosophy. His logical method, Navya Nyaaya, is a marvel of the human mind's analytical capacity, its terminological clarity is comparable to, and at times presented as more profound than, modern analytic philosophy. His precise definition of perversion, discussion of the Upady, subtle treatment of apperception, and logical proof of God testify to his unequaled intellect. Pange based and modern interpretations of Gangesa's life raise a broad social question. What was the relationship between intellectual genius and status based on birth? There is no complete agreement concerning these views. Nevertheless, his philosophical achievement makes clear that the value of reasoning, study, and knowledge is not determined by caste or social boundaries. The logical discipline of Navyañaya creates an intellectual domain in which the value of a proposition is determined not by birth or prestige but by evidence and reasoning. developing. Developed in Mithila, this method reached Navadvipa and other centres of learning in India and became the basis of a long-standing commentarial tradition. In this sense, the Tatvasintmai is an important representative work of the analytical genius of Mithila and of India as a whole.

← Transcript index