PERMANENT CHRONOLOGY RECORD · RELEASE 2026.09
The 2011 Bihar C-16 tables are therefore essential evidence for official language statistics, but they do not yield a straightforward Bajjika total comparable to Nepal’s separate Bajjika count.
2011
Research record
A History of Mithila, Vajji & Anga, Volume II · History_Mithila_Vajji_Anga_Volume_II_Cumulative_Part_36_onward_Chapter43_6x9_Hardback · paragraph 744
Scholarly apparatus
Evidence status: Cited chronology source record.
Source / provenance: A History of Mithila, Vajji & Anga, Volume II · History_Mithila_Vajji_Anga_Volume_II_Cumulative_Part_36_onward_Chapter43_6x9_Hardback · paragraph 744
Read historical and interpretive claims with the source register, chapter bibliography, uncertainty labels, and editorial method. Qualification is retained where interpretations compete.
Cite this record
Gajendra Thakur. “The 2011 Bihar C-16 tables are therefore essential evidence for official language statistics, but they do not yield a straightforward Bajjika total comparable to Nepal’s separate Bajjika count..” Videha Digital Research Archive: Mithila–Vajji–Anga. Videha — https://www.videha.co.in/ · ISSN 2229-547X · GitHub mirror: https://videha-ejournal.github.io/videha/ · Digital Research Archives on GitHub: https://github.com/videha-ejournal. https://videha-ejournal.github.io/mithila-vajji-anga/records/chronology/chronology-134/