PERMANENT CHRONOLOGY RECORD · RELEASE 2026.09
Prebish's review of the council literature remains useful precisely because it treats the sources comparatively and warns against making the Vaishali dispute identical with every later account of sectarian division (Prebish 1974).
1974
Research record
A History of Mithila, Vajji & Anga, Volume I · PDF page 127
Scholarly apparatus
Evidence status: Cited chronology source record.
Source / provenance: A History of Mithila, Vajji & Anga, Volume I · PDF page 127
Read historical and interpretive claims with the source register, chapter bibliography, uncertainty labels, and editorial method. Qualification is retained where interpretations compete.
Cite this record
Gajendra Thakur. “Prebish's review of the council literature remains useful precisely because it treats the sources comparatively and warns against making the Vaishali dispute identical with every later account of sectarian division (Prebish 1974)..” Videha Digital Research Archive: Mithila–Vajji–Anga. Videha — https://www.videha.co.in/ · ISSN 2229-547X · GitHub mirror: https://videha-ejournal.github.io/videha/ · Digital Research Archives on GitHub: https://github.com/videha-ejournal. https://videha-ejournal.github.io/mithila-vajji-anga/records/chronology/chronology-92/