Language is not only the naming of ready-made realities but also the means to classify social realities, visible and invisible. The names they give sometimes affect what society considers normal, deviant, criminal, or disease rights or identities. But this fact does not lead to the conclusion that reality is created only by language. The relationship between language and the world is a complex field of existence, experience, and objectivity. 60.1 Nomenclature and political meaning Different words may be used for the same person in a different power context, such as criminal, rebel, or terrorist. Words can trigger moral emotions and legal consequences, not just descriptions. Parallel philosophy asks what the facts of the story are. What is the criterion for naming? Whether the same term applies to the same event 60.2 Languages and the Power of Linguistic Information The classification of linguistic forms is not determined by linguistic distance alone. The state also influences education, literary reputation, standardization, scriptwriting, census, media, and political power. Calling a language form a dialect may be a neutral scientific statement, but sometimes a means of political undermining. Therefore, both linguistic evidence and social authority must be analyzed. 60.3 Standard language and civic accessibility Standard language administration simplifies education and mass communication. However, linguistic citizenship is unequal if standardization means treating local linguistic forms as impure, uneducated, or unfit. The extent to which citizens have access to information, education, justice and cultural creation in their mother tongue is a question of linguistic justice. 60.4 Silence is also the power Power cannot just choose the wrong words or make things happen without saying them. Absence of names in records, history in curriculum, language in statistics, or translation in institutions shapes public knowledge. Parallel philosophy asks questions about the unspoken with the spoken. 60.5 Fuoco Discussion and Limitations In modern thought, discourse theory shows that categories of knowledge can be linked to institutions and power relations. But parallel philosophy would not change this insight into extreme relativism. If power affects knowledge, it does not imply that all claims are equal. Conversely, the need to classify sources and institutions and examine them more rigorously increases. 60.6 Maithili and the Linguistic Dignity The philosophical use of regional languages such as Maithili raises questions of epistemology itself. Access to knowledge is unequal if higher education or philosophy is available only in the dominant language. Writing complex philosophy in one 's mother tongue is not only the task of translation; it is also conceptual creation and democratic knowledge- expansion. But linguistic pride should not become contempt for another language or community. Pūrvapakṣa (Prima Facie View): Language only expresses ideas. entity is outside the language. Uttarapakṣa (Response): Physical entities and institutions and resources exist outside of language, but language shapes their legitimacy, classification, and visibility. Words are not everything, but words are not useless either. 60.12 Dictionaries and social authorities The dictionary gives guidance on spelling and meaning while recording usage. But editorial decisions about whose text to compile, whose dialect to standardise, and how to mark off offensive meanings hold the key. Dictionaries cannot hide actual usage but may provide cautions and historical references to pejorative terms. The description and the support are different. Maithili lexicon includes regional variants, examples, chronologies, and sources. The surviving community could respond to the improvements. 60.13 The language of the Court A formal hearing is not real justice if the citizen does not understand the language of the charge, the evidence, or the verdict. The quality of the translators and the availability of technical posts and documents are prerequisites for the rights. Verbal translation will sometimes distort the legal meaning; a trained interpreter will distinguish between meaning, tone, and ambiguity. The parties should have the opportunity to challenge the translation. Local language use may reduce speed; these objections are a question of administrative preparedness, not a reason to deny authority. Standard terminology and training should be developed. 60.14 Humour and satire and power Humor is a powerful tool for criticism, fear reduction, and dissent. However, perpetuating stereotypes of vulnerable groups can normalize stigma. The same sentence can have different effects on the speaker depending on the target and context. Hurt feelings are not enough of a reason for censorship. Direct threats and targeted harassment and the reproduction of hierarchies should be examined separately. The answer is not only restrictions but also criticism and diversity of platforms. May the power itself endure the satire and may the citizens be protected. 60.15 Preface: Changing language does not change reality This objection is a fair reminder that respectful positions do not eliminate poverty or violence. Word-improvement can avoid structural work by being a cheap symbol. However, language expectations do affect classification and the likelihood of complaints. Abusive speech restores low status within the organization. The solution is not a false choice of word structure. Change the name, rules, resources, and representation at the same time. The effect has to be measured. 60.7 Naming and administration The administration puts people into categories such as beneficiary, migrant, backward, illegal or disabled. Category policy makes this possible but can also reduce the complexity of the person and create stigma. For the purpose of naming individuals, the question of what evidence they have and whether the person can appeal is important. The language of self-respect must be accompanied by genuine access to rights. 60.8 Methods of Silencing The voice will not give by direct negation only. Putting out agendas, not allowing technical language, and retaliating with ridicule or complaints leads to silence. Hearing loss is not just about the number of speakers. Whose question may change the verdict, whose evidence is recorded and answered remains to be seen. 60.9 Negotiation and Objective Resistance Discourse classifies and makes sense of things. diseases. crimes. or abnormalities. effects on one 's institutional life. But language does not make reality arbitrarily so. The body resists these losses and the resulting demands. Parallel vision holds both linguistic constructs and external reality. The category history should be checked as well as the empirical impact measured. 60.10 Linguistic politeness and structural change Respectful words can reduce offense, but words alone do not make the same person. New names can cover up old differences. Both the language and the resource must be changed. Remove abusive designations, as well as improve unequal treatment in recruitment, education, and service and justice. The symbolism and the structure are complementary to each other. 60.11 Ways of Knowledge-Building Writing down your philosophy isn 't just about translating ready-made ideas. Local examples: grammatical devices and living words can open up new questions. But technical ambiguity in the name of locality is not acceptable. The vocabulary should be open, defined, and reviewable. Sanskrit should communicate with other Indian languages and English, but Maithili syntax should be natural. The dignity of knowledge lies not in linguistic purism, but in the capacity to think. Chapter Conclusion Parallel Philosophy does not doubt every political use of language, but it does ask four questions: Who chose the word? On the basis of what facts Who was considered to have a normal experience? Who 's experience has been covered Linguistic justice does not replace truth; it widens the field of truth-seeking. Chapter Bibliography Ludwig Wittgenstein — Philosophical Investigations. Michel Foucault — The Archaeology of Knowledge; Discipline and Punish. Pierre Bourdieu — Language and Symbolic Power. Charles Taylor — “The Politics of Recognition”. Benedict Anderson — Imagined Communities. Bimal Krishna Matilal — The Word and the World.