Videha Digital Research Archive

Volume II · Socio-Cultural & Economic History

Chapter 026 · Complete

Land Grants and Changing Agrarian Society

A permanent research page in the two-volume History of Mithila, Vajji & Anga. The description below is the full source-controlled catalogue account for this chapter, followed by its complete indexed section structure.

Book
Volume II · Socio-Cultural & Economic History
Part
Part Iv — Early Medieval And Medieval Social Transformation
Source locator
Supplied cumulative manuscript · Chapters 26–35
Research structure
30 indexed sections

Detailed chapter description

Land grants are among the most informative written records for the social and economic history of early medieval eastern India, but they are also among the easiest to overread. A copper-plate charter can describe a village, its boundaries and resources, the dues attached to it, the exemptions granted to a beneficiary, the officials and residents who were notified, and the religious or scholarly purpose of the donation. It does not, by itself, reveal the acreage actually cultivated, the proportion of households affected, the everyday bargaining power of cultivators, or the long-term success of the grant. This chapter therefore treats land grants as legal and fiscal interventions into agrarian society rather than as transparent photographs of village life. For Mithila–Tirabhukti and the Aṅga–Mudgagiri zone, the surviving charters are especially valuable because they can be located within identifiable administrative landscapes and compared across several centuries. Modern language often compresses a land grant into the statement that a king ‘gave a village’. The charters are more precise and more complicated. What could be transferred included claims to revenue, rights over specified resources, immunities from particular royal demands, authority to receive payments from residents, and in some cases judicial or policing privileges. The physical soil, the cultivators’ labour, the king’s fiscal claims and the beneficiary’s rights were not identical things. Historians therefore need to ask what exactly changed hands in each record. The wording of a grant is also formulaic. Repeated phrases are evidence for chancery practice and legal expectations, but their repetition does not prove that every listed privilege was enforced identically in every locality. The method adopted here is to read formula, geography, recipient, revenue terms and local society separately before asking how they combined.

Place in the two-volume history

This chapter belongs to the Socio-Cultural & Economic History volume. It places social institutions, cultural practices and economic life within the changing historical worlds of Mithila, Vajji and Anga across India and Nepal, linking local evidence to wider structures without collapsing the three regions into a single timeless unit.