Decoding the Panji of Mithila · Volume V · Chapter 3

Phoolsara, Haraut, Pothia Sultanpur, Varadaha, and Majlishpur: Early Branch Expansion After the Halayudh Frame

Chapter 3
  Phoolsara, Haraut, Pothia Sultanpur, Varadaha, and Majlishpur: Early
Branch Expansion After the Halayudh Frame

  1. The movement from root prestige to village-network
detail
   The previous chapter decoded the opening scholarly frame: Vallal Sen,
Mahamahopadhyay Halayudh, and the early learned line that expanded
through Ratneshwar, Halleshwar, Sureshwar, Jeeveshwar, Rajuhaldhar,
Yogishwar, Varah, Rati, Mani, Vasudev, Gopal, Manohar, Prithvipati, and
the beginning of the Phoolsara branch.
   Chapter 3 now enters the more difficult work. The Panji moves from the
dignity of the root line into the dense village-network of actual family
expansion. The names are still connected to the earlier branch, but the
structure is now less ceremonial and more practical. The record begins to
behave like a working marriage-register: it names sons, daughters, wives,
aliases, villages, and repeated “अपरा” links. It shows how one remembered
line is spread through several settlements and marriage houses.
  The main areas in this chapter are:
  Phoolsara continuation;
  Madanpur branch;
  Haraut Desh Amrauni;
  Dhangri and Varadaha sections;
  Govindpur, Fattehpur, Pothia Sultanpur;
  Majlishpur;
  Kholdhar and Jaldhar branches;
   later descendants through Ramakant , Raghunath , Panchanand , Devendra
, Yadunath , Gunānand , and Jhulanand / Devanand.
   This chapter therefore illustrates the most important rule of Panji reading:
after the root ancestor is established, the text becomes a network of houses.

  2. Phoolsara after the first Vidyanidhi branch
  The Phoolsara section continues from the earlier Vidyanidhi and Kavi
Dhanesh material. We now find Ramakant’s line, linked with Belauch and
Lalit’s son Kanaki. The source then shifts to Kotahpurwa and Madanpur,
where Shrikant, also known as Rupan, appears with sons Radhakant and
Jayakant.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 42
   This shows a typical Panji transition. The place heading “Phoolsara” is
still active, but the line has moved through Ramakant into another settlement
connection. The reader should not treat Kotahpurwa or Madanpur as
unrelated insertions. They are part of the Phoolsara expansion.
  Shrikant / Rupan’s line is linked with Phoolsara residence and Khadik
Khaual. The mention of Bhilku’s son Jhaptu , followed by Bhanupur
Panichobh and Anantalal , shows that this branch is already tied to Khaual ,
Panichobh , and Belauch - related marriage fields.
  The important point is not merely that Shrikant had sons. The important
point is that Shrikant’s descendants became part of a wider matrimonial
network connecting Phoolsara to Khaual , Panichobh , Raut / Rama - related
houses , Pothia Mahishi Budhwal , and Ramnagar Narsam Baliyas.

  3. Radhakant and the first daughter-marriage cluster
   Radhakant’s line is especially useful for understanding how the Panji
records daughters. The text names Shivkant, Vasudev, Kamdev, and
Premkant. Then it records female descendants and marriage links: Purnima,
Shilavati, Musanvati, and others. These women are connected through
“आद्या” and “अपरा” entries to different houses.
  The first entry places one woman with Ramai-vasi Raudh and
Gangadhar’s son Vanshidhar. Another connects Pothia Mahishi Budhwal
with Yashodhar’s son Mahavir. Another connects Ramnagar Narsam Baliyas
with Kalpanath’s son Kanchan.
   This is not ornamental genealogy. Each daughter’s marriage preserves a
path between houses. If later descendants from these houses seek marriage
alliances, the Panji must remember these connections. Thus, women’s
entries here form the invisible threads of the social map.

  4. Radhakant’s sons: Shivkant, Vasudev, Kamdev, Premkant
   Radhakant’s descendants include Shivkant , Vasudev , Kamdev , and
Premkant. They are linked with Amon / Amaun , Kako Belauch , Rajnath ,
and Kapileshwar. The source also names Rambha and Tarini as a maternal
or female - associated line.
   This section reveals another important pattern: a male-descendant list may
be immediately followed by maternal grouping. The name Rambha should
not be ignored. When the Panji says “Rambha putra Tarini” or a similar
phrase, it indicates that a branch is associated through Rambha. This can
distinguish one set of sons from another.
 Mayakant’s sons Krishnakant and Hemkant are connected with Palasi,
Majhaura Karmah, Khushan, Haridev, Ratauli Darhiara, and Babua.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 43
Jagannath’s son Indranarayan is connected with Jaynagar, Sangram Ekhara,
Bokai, Premlal, Rajanpura Darhiara, and Chumman.
  Within a small space the record ties the branch to Belauch, Karmah,
Darhiara, Ekhara, and Rajanpura. This is the Panji’s network method at
work.

  5. Haraut Desh Amrauni: Dharmapati’s branch
  The next major heading is Haraut Desh Amrauni. It returns to the line of
Manohar and Dharmapati. Dharmapati’s sons include Hemkar and
Shubhankar. The branch is linked with Satalarwa, Saday, and Krishnapati.
   Another branch from Dharmapati gives Ganodi, connected with Diha,
Kadaraini, Vabhaniyam, Narottam, Dinbandhu, and Khaual. This reveals
that Dharmapati’s line did not remain in one place. It spread into multiple
marriage fields.
   Hemkar’s sons include Judaun and Buddhinath , linked with Jarhatiya Pali
, Bhatan , Gidu , Malangia Kujouli , and Govind. Another Hemkar branch
gives Manoranjan , connected again with Kadarain Vabhaniyam , Narottam ,
Dinbandhu , Nahas , and Khaual / Bhavesh.
   The repeated appearance of Vabhaniyam, Narottam, and Dinbandhu
indicates either recurring marriages into related houses or the need to
distinguish closely connected alliance lines. A Panji reader must not collapse
these into one event. Repetition may signal different branches.

  6. Judaun, Nakatu, Manoranjan, and Milan
  Judaun’s son Nakatu is linked with Mander and Modi. Manoranjan’s son
Milan is linked with Sakuri Darhiara, Lochan, Bhramar, Pachahi Jajival, and
Anantram.
  Manoranjan also has another branch through Taradatt, also known as
Chanda, and through Hardatt and Saburdatt. These are connected with
Samauli Pali and Gopal’s son Dharmapati.
   Here “प्र0” again serves a necessary function. Taradatt is also known as
Chanda. Without the alias, a later reader may treat Taradatt and Chanda as
two different men. The Panji avoids such confusion by retaining both the
formal and the popular name.
   Taradatt / Chanda’s descendants include Shulpani , also known as Matanu
, Babuni , and Bastilal. These are linked with Alay , Ankhi , Sanath ,
Kasraud Ekhara , Pathak Soni , Majhiyam Karmah , Kanhaiya , Satauli
Satlakha , Vishnupati , Khedan , Majhaura Karmah , Pannapani , Govinddatt
, Rudradatt / Darwari , Parakhand Baheradhi , Machali , and Gopal.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 44
  This is one of the densest passages in the chapter. It shows how one
Haraut-Amrauni branch reaches into Alay, Ekhara, Karmah, Satlakha,
Baheradhi, and other mools.

  7. Dhangri: Hardatt/Badrinath and the Baboolal–
Kanhaiyalal branch
  The Dhangri section begins with Hardatt, also known as Badrinath. His
sons include Baboolal and Kanhaiyalal. They are connected with Alay,
Ankhi, Sanath, Kansam Mander, and Dukhia.
   Baboolal’s son Parashmani, also known as Bachai, is linked with
Sahastram Darhiara, Krishnadatt, Eknath, Jarhatiya Pali, Tena, Kanhaiya,
Babamani, Malichham Naroun, and Premnath. Babamani’s descendants
include Lakshman, Lakshmikant, and Kamalanand, linked with Anilpur
Karmah, Vanshi, Mitranath, Ratauli Darhiara, and Dularaiya.
  Lakshman’s sons include Navsundar, Devsundar, Bholanath, and Karelal.
They are connected with Kalkapur-vasi Parhat Sakaradhi, Bhaiyo’s grandson
Babunandan, Yadunandan, Sodarpur, and Madhusudan. Another Lakshman
branch includes Taranand and Gajanand, linked with Bhatiyahi Mahishi
Budhwal, Kalidatt, Jamuni, Adraha Tatail Sakaradhi, and Pujan.
  This section gives a clear example of how a branch can be identified by
both father and mother-line or marital settlement. Dhangri becomes the
section-heading, but the descendants are distributed across many houses.

  8. Chetanath/Ugramani, Damodar, Shubhankar, Jeevanath,
Chaturbhuj, and Vidyanand
   The Dhangri passage continues through Chetanath , also known as
Ugramani. His son Damodar is connected with Hariam Rakhwari , Babunath
/ Lala , Ojholi Belauch , and Jhadla.
  Shubhankar’s sons include Jeevanath and Chaturbhuj, connected with
Khaual, Dharmapati, Kala, Bhanpur Panichobh, Chaudhary Gunanand, and
Kamalanand’s son Vidyanand. Vidyanand is linked with Belauch and
Jayanti Lal.
  This is a continuation of the learned-social pattern seen earlier. The names
Vidyanand and Kamalanand carry learned or auspicious Sanskritic forms,
while the place-links show marriage geography. A single person’s identity is
made of both.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 45
  9. Haraut Desh Varadaha: Gonod, Khekhan, and the
Varadaha network
  The next major heading is Haraut Desh Varadaha, identified with Saharsa.
Gonod’s son Khekhan appears as the branch figure. He is linked with
Samauli Pali, Dharmapati’s son Rohini, Digaun Sodarpur, and Bhaiyaram.
  Khekhan’s sons include Lal, Bholanath, Mathuranath, and Janakinath.
These are connected with Tatail Sakaradhi, Kantikar, Kumud, Sarisav
Sodarpur, and Chengna. Another branch from Khekhan gives Gopinath and
Babunath, linked with Murajpur Khaual and Karu. A maternal note,
Ratnavati, appears.
   The branch also includes Dukhia, linked with Nikhuti and Durgadatt, and
Bhanginath, linked with Brahmpur Mander, Sitaram, and Lala. Radhanath is
linked with Katma Vabhaniyam, Baburam, Sarisav, Bhavanath, and
Gangavati.
   The Varadaha section is a strong example of branch multiplication.
Khekhan’s descendants are distributed through Sakaradhi, Sodarpur, Khaual,
Nikhuti, Mander, Vabhaniyam, and Sarisav. This is not a village genealogy
in the narrow sense; it is a marriage map centered on a village-labeled
branch.

  10. Gopinath, Manohar, Achambhit, Dukhia, and
Raghunandan
   Gopinath’s sons include Manohar and Achambhit. They are linked with
Ratauli Darhiara, Kauskidatt, Bachcha, Pali, and Badari. Another branch
through Dukhia gives Raghunandan, connected with Baisi-vasi Suday
Belauch and Kirtinath.
  The names Manohar and Achambhit recur elsewhere in the broader Panji
world. Their presence here does not mean they are identical to earlier
persons of the same name. The father, village, and branch context must
decide identity.
   This point is crucial for the whole book. Repeated names are common. A
chart made only from names will be wrong. A correct chart must include
father, mool, village, wife, and branch markers.

  11. Govindpur Raghunandan Mishra and Fattehpur Sonelal
  A short Govindpur section names Raghunandan Mishra. His line is linked
with Dadhikhap Dhanauj, Kusambal, Bhaiya’s son Hari, Sangram Ekhara,
and Mayalal.

                 Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 46
   Then Fattehpur Sonelal appears: Manohar’s son Sonelal is linked with
Neyam Kujouli and Garjlal. Though short, this entry is important because it
ties the chapter’s branch network back to Neyam Kujouli, a major mool that
will later require a full chapter of its own.
   Short entries like these should not be dismissed. They are often the
bridges between large sections.

  12. Sultanpur Desh Pothia: Bhaiya and the twelve marriages
   The Pothia Sultanpur section is one of the most important passages in this
chapter because it explicitly states that Bhaiya had twelve marriages. Such a
note is rare and highly useful. It explains why the branch suddenly multiplies
through many “अपरा” entries.
  The line begins with Mishra Diha’s son Bhaiya, connected with Rajaura
Mander, Fani, Ganesh, Pali, and Chilkha. Bhaiya’s son Muralidhar is linked
with Jarhatiya Pali, Khushihal, Tena, Parhat Sakaradhi, and Modi.
  Other Bhaiya branches include:
  Buddhinath and Mathuranath, linked with Sakri Baliyas, Harikrishna,
Jagat Ram, Padmapur Panichobh, and Doman.
  Sadhu, linked with Raudh, Ram, Maniram, Oda Luhra, and Modi.
  A daughter linked with Pani/Madan and Narayandatt.
  Another daughter linked with Kusamal and Nandani’s son Nanu.
  Birbal, linked with Brahmpur Sakaradhi and Bandhu.
  A daughter linked with Oini and Kumar Vacha.
  A daughter linked with Kusumbal and Lali.
  A daughter linked with Kariyan Panichobh and Dharmadatt’s son
Kalidatt.
  A daughter linked with Ratipad Belauch and Rameshwar’s son Saburdatt.
  A daughter linked with Udyant Jalay and Saburdatt.
 Tofalal, linked with Majlishpur, Bhanpur Panichobh, Chaura Dhairy,
Meena, and Sahabini.
  The final note that Bhaiya had twelve marriages gives structure to the
whole cluster. It means that the many “ अपरा” entries must not be treated as
unrelated fragments. They are the record of a large polygynous or multi-
marriage branch. Each marriage created a separate genealogical relation and
possibly separate offspring or alliance obligations.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 47
  13. The social importance of Bhaiya’s twelve marriages
   Bhaiya’s twelve marriages are not merely a biographical curiosity. They
affect the genealogy deeply. A man with twelve marriages creates twelve
possible alliance channels. His descendants may belong to different maternal
houses. His daughters may connect the family to many mools. His sons may
carry different maternal identities.
   For marriage regulation, this is vital. Later generations must know not
only that they descend from Bhaiya, but also through which wife or which
alliance. Otherwise prohibited or close relationships might be overlooked.
  This is why the Panji preserves the marriage list. It is doing social work. It
remembers what memory alone could lose.

  14. Varadaha: Mathuranath, Shishtlal, Sonelal, Shaktilal,
and Nokhelal
  The Varadaha continuation names Mathuranath’s sons Shishtlal and
Sonelal, linked with Mahishi Budhwal, Shivdatt, Chaudhary Tofalal,
Kujouli, and Baburam. Another Mathuranath branch gives Shaktilal and
Nokhelal, linked with Katka Mander and Gogal. Shishtlal’s sons include
Bhadramani and Chandramani.
   This section shows a smaller but important Varadaha-related branch. It
links Pothia-Sultanpur material with Budhwal, Kujouli, and Mander. The
names Sonelal and Tofalal also echo nearby branches, so careful identity
separation is required.

  15. Shripur Desh Majlishpur: Tofalal and the four sons
  The Majlishpur section begins with Tofalal. His sons include Yogdhar,
Haldhar, Kholdhar, and Jaldhar. They are connected with Khamgada-vasi
Anilpur Karmah, Poshan, Vanshi, Parisara, and Tota. A maternal note,
Parvati, appears; then Nityamaya and Yogmaya are named.
  This section is important because it gives four major branch-heads:
  Yogdhar,
  Haldhar,
  Kholdhar,
  Jaldhar.
   Each becomes a possible sub-branch. The Panji does not always announce
this with a modern heading. The reader must notice it from the grammar.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 48
  16. Yogdhar and the Nityamaya–Yogmaya marriage links
   The Majlishpur section records Nityamaya and Yogmaya. One marriage is
linked with Singholi Mander and Nandipati’s son Santalal. Another link
involves Jayaram, Khangud Sarisav, Indramani’s son Damodar, and
Yogdhar’s daughter connected with Nahas Khaual, Jhaun, Kalikant, Gaur
Sodarpur, and Baidyanath.
  These entries show again that women carry the alliance network.
Nityamaya and Yogmaya are not decorative female names. They help
organize the marriage paths between Majlishpur, Mander, Sarisav, Khaual,
and Sodarpur.
  The phrase “Gangavati नी0” appears nearby. This should be handled
cautiously. It may indicate no recorded continuation for Gangavati or a
similar absence marker. The exact force should not be over-expanded
without further confirmation.

  17. Haldhar, Umanath/Bauku, and the Chandraavati branch
  Haldhar’s son Umanath , also known as Bauku , is linked with Satauli
Satlakha , Tofalal’s son Tengar , Majhiyam Karmah , and Kanhaiya. A
maternal note , Chandraavati , appears. Satyabhama is also recorded , linked
with Anhara Katai , Bachhilal’s son Bhimdatt , and wife / children markers.
  Another Haldhar branch links with Kurma Khaual, Babuni’s son Khantar,
Kako Belauch, Sonmani, and Shrinath.
  The repetition of Chandraavati and other female names in this passage
suggests that the Panji is distinguishing branches through maternal identity.
This must be preserved in later charts.

  18. Kholdhar Mishra: Samaryamani, Sundarmani, and the
Kholdhar sons
   The Majlishpur Kholdhar Mishra section begins with Samaryamani and
the line of Bhulanvati and Sundarmani. One marriage is linked with Narsam
Baliyas, Banmali, Tinkauri, and a son Suryanand of Bakhri. Another
marriage links Sundarmani with Khadik Khaual, Maujilal’s grandson
Bhilku, Babua, and Chaturanand.
   Kholdhar’s sons include Muralidhar, Shridhar, and Vidyadhar. These are
linked with Kodhila-vasi Dih Sakouna, Nand Kumar’s son Dokai, Oda
Ekhara, and Baboolal. A maternal note, Sakalmani, appears with Sita.
  Another Kholdhar branch gives Jatadhar and Gajadhar, linked with
Phulpur-vasi Singhauli Mander, Dayanath’s son Mohan, Shaktiraypur

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 49
Naroun, and Hanuman. Anupama appears as a mother or maternal figure,
and Chandraavati is linked with Naduar Karmah and Vachan Datt Gajanand.
  This section shows how Kholdhar’s line divides into several sub-
branches. It also shows the continued importance of Mander, Ekhara,
Naroun, Karmah, and Khaual connections.

   19. Jaldhar: Ramakant, Radhakant, and the Kurma Khaual
line
  Jaldhar’s sons include Ramakant and Radhakant , linked with Dih
Darhiara , Lakshman’s son Sundarlal , Hati Sodarpur , and Tulsinath. A
maternal note , Satyamaya , appears , and Anuradha is named with a “ नीह /
नी0” - like marker.
  Another Jaldhar branch gives Raghunath, Yadunath, Ganeshnath, and
Maheshnath. These are linked with Kurma Khaual, Babuni’s son Khantar,
Kako Belauch, and Shrinath.
   The Jaldhar branch is a good example of the Panji’s double structure: two
sons are given first, then another branch of sons appears through a separate
maternal or marital line. Without recognizing the grouping, the reader may
incorrectly combine all sons under one mother or one marriage.

 20. Ramakant’s descendants: Kamalakant, Dayakant,
Mayakant
   Ramakant’s sons include Kamalakant, Dayakant, and Mayakant. They are
connected with Palasi Kako Belauch, Deshi’s son Tirthanand, Puraini
Rajaura Mander, and Naubatilal. Savitri appears as a maternal figure,
followed by Indravati.
   Kamalakant’s son Udaykant is linked with Athiyabadi Diha Mander and
Dayanand. Dayakant’s son Pramod is linked with Bhatwad Bhavpur
Panichobh and Tirthanand. Radhakant’s sons Krishnakant and Shankar are
linked with Palasi Kako Belauch, Vanshi, Tirthanand, Puraini Rajaura
Mander, and Naubatilal. Purna Day appears as another maternal or female
marker.
  Mayakant’s sons include Amod and Sunil, connected with Rahatmina and
Ratauli Darhiara through Shridhar’s son Leelamohan. Kunti appears as a
maternal note. Krishnakant’s son Gopal is linked with Maldwar Jhaua
Panichobh, Jagmohan, and Jaykant.
  This subsection preserves several generations with women’s names
embedded as organizing markers: Savitri, Indravati, Purna Day, Kunti.
These should be recorded in later charts.

                 Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 50
  21. Raghunath’s line: Panchanand and the daughters Tara,
Radha, Indeshwari, Tira
  Raghunath’s son Panchanand is linked with Yamua Tarouni Karmah,
Nand Kishor, Kavai Naroun, and Chichan. The source then names Tara and
daughters Radha, Indeshwari, and Tira.
  The marriages are given through “आद्या” and “अपरा”:
  One marriage links Dabhra Rajaura Mander with Kokan, also known as
Anuplal, and Balkrishna.
  Another links Athiyabadi Pariyamb Budhwal with Gunanand’s son
Gangadhar.
 Another links Rita/Ramai Rajaura Mander with Vishnudev’s son
Mahendra.
  This passage is an excellent example of why female lines must be
decoded in detail. Tara, Radha, Indeshwari, and Tira connect Raghunath’s
branch to Mander, Budhwal, and related houses. These links are essential for
marriage memory.

  22. Panchanand’s son Devendra and the modernizing
continuation
   Panchanand’s son Devendra is linked with Dedhua Kako Belauch,
Buddhinath’s son Mahesh, Sandahpur Didhoy, and Harivansh. The source
then names Pramila and daughters Ranjana, Manjula, Poonam, and Nutan.
  The daughters’ marriages connect to:
  Rahatmina and Suresh’s son Mithilesh,
  Kotahpur and Mahant’s son Hrishikesh,
  Parmanpur and Baidyanath’s grandson Mahendra’s son Lalan Kumar,
  Shivnagar Mahindrapur Pandua and Jeevanand’s grandson Kshamanand’s
son Phanindra.
  Devendra’s daughter is then linked with Bahora Belsam Budhwal and
Ramanand. Sugandha and Khushi appear in continuation.
  This section is late enough in style to feel close to modern genealogical
memory. The names Ranjana, Manjula, Poonam, Nutan, Sugandha, and
Khushi show a more modern naming register, while the Panji structure
remains traditional. The old method continues into new generations.

                 Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 51
  23. Yadunath’s line: Rudranand, Gananand, Jhulanand
   Yadunath’s sons include Rudranand, Gananand, and Jhulanand. They are
linked with Rakhwari Hariamb, Genalal’s son Bulan, Sakuri Belauch, and
Bhutuk. A maternal note, Budhmaya, appears, followed by daughters Girija,
Sunita, Lakshmi, and Mamta.
  Their marriages connect with:
  Belaibhitthi Panichobh and Uchitlal’s son Bhola,
  Tamkuda Tarouni Karmah and Giranand’s son Shashidhar,
  Tegachhia Majhaura Karmah and Chandrakant’s son Subodh,
  Saranpur Visphi and Shakuntalal’s son Shri Narayan.
  Rudranand’s sons include Virendra, Harendra, and Dhirendra, linked with
Phoolbadi Neyam Kujouli, Triveni’s son Devikant, Rajaura Mander, and
Rambodh. Anjula and Vandana appear as female or maternal names.
Virendra’s sons include Saurabh and Sagar, linked with Bhramarpur
Bhubaneswar.
  This section connects the branch into modern names and wide geographic
movement while retaining the old Panji grammar. It is a model of continuity.

  24. Gunanand and Jhulanand/Devanand
   Gunanand’s sons include Krishna, Kamal, Balram, and Shyam. They are
linked with Saranpur Nanyapur Visphi, Narlal’s son Achhelal, Jhaua
Panichobh, and Mukund. Pramila appears as a mother or maternal marker.
  Jhulanand , also known as Devanand , has a son Shubham. This line is
connected with Vardabatta Simarbad Khaual , Chandranath’s son Shivnath ,
Sarada / Saradawasi Malangia Kujouli , and Jyotishi Chhotelal. Suman
appears with daughters Nupur and Nidhi.
   The names Shubham, Suman, Nupur, and Nidhi are clearly modern in
feeling, but the structure is still Panji-like: father, alias, village, mool,
marriage or descent connection, maternal marker, daughters.
   This passage is valuable because it shows the Panji’s living continuity. It
did not stop with medieval scholastic names. It continued to absorb modern
family names and modern settlement realities.

  25. Main branches decoded in this chapter
  The chapter may be summarized by branch:
  Phoolsara–Madanpur branch

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 52
  Ramakant , Shrikant / Rupan , Radhakant , Jayakant , Shivkant ,
Vasudev , Kamdev , Premkant , Mayakant , Krishnakant , Hemkant ,
Jagannath , Indranarayan.
  Haraut Desh Amrauni branch
  Dharmapati , Hemkar , Shubhankar , Ganodi , Judaun , Buddhinath ,
Manoranjan , Nakatu , Milan , Taradatt / Chanda , Shulpani / Matanu ,
Babuni , Bastilal , Govinddatt , Rudradatt / Darwari.
  Dhangri branch
  Hardatt / Badrinath , Baboolal , Kanhaiyalal , Parashmani / Bachai ,
Babamani , Lakshman , Lakshmikant , Kamalanand , Navsundar ,
Devsundar , Bholanath , Karelal , Taranand , Gajanand.
  Varadaha branch
  Gonod, Khekhan, Lal, Bholanath, Mathuranath, Janakinath, Gopinath,
Babunath, Dukhia, Bhanginath, Radhanath, Manohar, Achambhit,
Raghunandan.
  Pothia Sultanpur branch
  Bhaiya, Muralidhar, Buddhinath, Mathuranath, Sadhu, Birbal, Tofalal,
and the twelve-marriage network.
  Majlishpur branch
   Tofalal , Yogdhar , Haldhar , Kholdhar , Jaldhar , Nityamaya , Yogmaya ,
Umanath / Bauku , Kholdhar’s sons Muralidhar , Shridhar , Vidyadhar ,
Jatadhar , Gajadhar.
  Jaldhar–Ramakant–Raghunath continuation
  Ramakant , Radhakant , Raghunath , Yadunath , Ganeshnath ,
Maheshnath , Kamalakant , Dayakant , Mayakant , Panchanand , Devendra ,
Yadunath’s sons Rudranand , Gananand , Jhulanand / Devanand.

  26. What this chapter teaches
  This chapter teaches four major principles.
  First, a village heading does not limit the genealogy to one village.
Phoolsara, Haraut, Pothia, Varadaha, and Majlishpur are organizing labels,
but the branches spread widely.
  Second , aliases are essential. Shrikant / Rupan , Taradatt / Chanda ,
Shulpani / Matanu , Hardatt / Badrinath , Parashmani / Bachai , Umanath /
Bauku , and Jhulanand / Devanand show that the Panji preserves both formal
and practical names.

                 Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 53
   Third, women’s entries structure the whole genealogy. Purnima, Shilavati,
Musanvati, Rambha, Ratanavati, Gangavati, Parvati, Nityamaya, Yogmaya,
Chandraavati, Anupama, Savitri, Kunti, Tara, Radha, Indeshwari, Tira,
Pramila, Ranjana, Manjula, Poonam, Nutan, Budhmaya, Girija, Sunita,
Lakshmi, Mamta, Suman, Nupur, and Nidhi are part of the branch
architecture.
   Fourth, multiple marriage is not an incidental note. Bhaiya’s twelve
marriages show why the Panji must be read as a marriage-regulatory
archive. A person with many marriages creates many alliance lines, and each
line must be remembered.

 27. Conclusion: the early branch becomes a dense social
web
   The material decoded in this chapter begins as a continuation of the
Phoolsara branch, but it quickly opens into Haraut, Pothia Sultanpur,
Varadaha, Dhangri, Govindpur, Fattehpur, and Majlishpur. The branch is no
longer a single descent line. It is a social web.
  This is the essential nature of Volume II Panji. A person belongs to an
ancestor, but also to a mool, a wife’s house, a mother’s line, a village, a
migration route, and a future marriage field. The Panji records all of this in
compressed language.
  The next chapter will continue from the subsequent sections after this
early expansion, following the line as it moves into additional settlements,
scholarly branches, and marriage networks. The method will remain the
same: every name will be read through descent, place, marriage, title, and
branch-continuity.

                  Decoding the Panji of Mithila - Volume V | 54

Illustrated research apparatus

Mithila · Vajji · Anga