V.L.F. tools

V.L.F. · मैथिली · Lalit Kala main page

Historic Lalit Kala Akademi Awardees · Critical Notes

Twenty-five additional, officially documented award records: ten awardees of the 55th NEA (2014) and fifteen awardees of the 57th NEA (2016). These are older entries not included in the later roster pages. The annual reports provide the artist and awarded-work title; no unverified details are added.

Official 55th NEA annual report ↗ · Official 57th NEA annual report ↗

1. Anamika Vijayaveeraraghavan

55th NEA (2014) · Untitled · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

2. Kaushik Halder

55th NEA (2014) · Changes of Life - 1 · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

3. Manoj Kumar Mohanty

55th NEA (2014) · Dust Cleaner · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

4. Mohammed Ayazuddin Patel

55th NEA (2014) · Bijapur Heritage · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

5. Nongmaithem Nandaraj Singh

55th NEA (2014) · Great Dictator · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

6. Rajesh Kumar Singh

55th NEA (2014) · Struggle in Life · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

7. Sanjeeva Rao Guthi

55th NEA (2014) · Twinkil Twinkil Little Star (Diptych) · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

8. Shrinivas Govindrao Mehetre

55th NEA (2014) · Untitled · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

9. Srinivasa Reddy N.

55th NEA (2014) · I Want That ....! · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

10. Sumana Som

55th NEA (2014) · Dramatic Dream · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

11. Amit Kumar (Lucknow)

57th NEA (2016) · Intimacy Roar · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

12. Dheeraj Yadav (Allahabad)

57th NEA (2016) · Untitled-40 · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

13. Lokanath Pradhan (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · 31st December · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

14. Kapadia Gulab Mansukhbhai (Vadodara)

57th NEA (2016) · Swastik Watch Co. · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

15. Kaushik Saha (Vadodara)

57th NEA (2016) · Turmoil of Revisiting the Past · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

16. Pooja Mondal (Vadodara)

57th NEA (2016) · The Monologue of Spaces · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

17. Pratiksha Apurv (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · Cosmic Balance · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

18. Radhakrishna Rao (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · Vishranti · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

19. Ravinder Kumar (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · Art Happens - 9 · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

20. Vipul Nagjibhai Prajapati (Ahmedabad)

57th NEA (2016) · My Dream v/s My Reality · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

21. Girish Chandra Behera (Bhubaneswar)

57th NEA (2016) · White Smoke · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

22. Madhab Das (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · An Inconvenient Truth · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

23. Rajeev Kumar (New Delhi)

57th NEA (2016) · Composition-1 · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

24. Sharad Sonkusale (Rohtak)

57th NEA (2016) · Untitled-1 · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

25. Swapnesh Harichandra Vaigankar (Goa)

57th NEA (2016) · Voyage · National Exhibition of Art (visual arts)

Critical note: the official annual report records this awarded work by title and exhibition year. Its strongest evidence is the pairing of title, artist and NEA selection; the note therefore treats the entry as a documented visual-art record without attributing an unverified medium, biography or interpretation.

This expanded note reads each awardee through medium, line, colour, form, material, exhibition space and the viewer’s relation to the work. Visual art is best understood by holding history, making process and local context together.

Lalit Kala main pagePrevious 50 notesPrevious 40 notesClassic reviewsNobelBookerJnanpithSahitya AkademiSangeet NatakNepal PrajnaMadan PuraskarVidyapati KoshNepal SajhaOther prizes

Classic Reviews